Excellent. All entrants 11.9 13.6 Excellent T3e Part-time entrants aged 30 and under 13.6 34.2 Excellent Non- continuation p/t, 2 years after year of entry Part-time entrants aged over 30 13.7 29.6 Excellent All part-time entrants 13.7 30.9 Excellent T5 Projected to gain a degree 80.9 74.8 Excellent Projected completion for f/t first degree Neither award nor transfer 11.1 16 Excellent Projected to gain other award 4 4.2 Does not highlight an issue Projected to transfer 3.9 5.1 Does not highlight an issue The above analysis suggests the relative performance of CCCU in relation to access and retention to be better than benchmark (or location adjusted benchmark) on all measures except four. With respect to these measures, there is scope for improvement in relation to the widening access of young, full-time other, and part time first degree, undergraduate students from lower socio-economic groups (NS SEC 4-7) and LPNs respectively. However, a key target for CCCU will be to maintain this level of performance in relation to access and retention in a climate where higher fees are charged. The Agreement therefore includes a strong focus on maintaining both access and retention performance. Another measure of CCCU‟s relative success with regard to WP is the proportion of CCCU‟s WP premium relative to the overall HEFCE teaching grant. On this measure, in respect of funding for 2012/13, CCCU is proportionately better off than most institutions with regard to WP student success funding as a percentage of its recurrent grant. The performance of CCCU is one of the highest in the sector (9th out of all of all universities receiving WP premium funding). In making these WP calculations, HEFCE uses Polar2 Quintile 1 and 2 for young full- time students and Quintile 1 and 2 from the „qualified adults classification‟ for mature and part-time students.
Appears in 2 contracts
Sources: Access Agreement, Access Agreement