External Quality Matters Review Sample Clauses

External Quality Matters Review i. Faculty may choose this option for one course and then are exempted from Readiness Check for their other courses for that cycle and are exempted from course review for this and the next cycle (6 years). The Department ▇▇▇▇ or immediate supervisor, the Federation, and the ▇▇▇▇, Learning Resources and Online Learning will be notified that this option has been chosen. ii. Faculty successfully completing this option receive a Quality Matters stipend of $500. iii. Review and subsequent work on the course will be conducted using official Quality Matters standards and established Quality Matters Review protocol and will occur over the course of one semester in the cycle as determined by the instructor and Bucks Online iv. Bucks Online will submit a final report to the instructor, the Federation, and to the Department ▇▇▇▇ or immediate supervisor. The College and Federation will in the future consider additional options as they develop and become feasible, such as an OL201 course and a Professional Learning Community devoted to online instruction.
View Source

Related to External Quality Matters Review

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Evaluation, Testing, and Monitoring 1. The System Agency may review, test, evaluate and monitor Grantee’s Products and services, as well as associated documentation and technical support for compliance with the Accessibility Standards. Review, testing, evaluation and monitoring may be conducted before and after the award of a contract. Testing and monitoring may include user acceptance testing. Neither the review, testing (including acceptance testing), evaluation or monitoring of any Product or service, nor the absence of review, testing, evaluation or monitoring, will result in a waiver of the State’s right to contest the Grantee’s assertion of compliance with the Accessibility Standards. 2. Grantee agrees to cooperate fully and provide the System Agency and its representatives timely access to Products, records, and other items and information needed to conduct such review, evaluation, testing, and monitoring.

  • Quality Assurance/Quality Control Contractor shall establish and maintain a quality assurance/quality control program which shall include procedures for continuous control of all construction and comprehensive inspection and testing of all items of Work, including any Work performed by Subcontractors, so as to ensure complete conformance to the Contract with respect to materials, workmanship, construction, finish, functional performance, and identification. The program established by Contractor shall comply with any quality assurance/quality control requirements incorporated in the Contract.

  • Human and Financial Resources to Implement Safeguards Requirements The Borrower shall make available necessary budgetary and human resources to fully implement the EMP and the RP.