Common use of FIGURES Clause in Contracts

FIGURES. Figure 1: Number of Children in DHS Custody at the End of SFY - 2004 to 2019 15 Figure 2: Children in Custody on December 31, 2018 by Age Group (Total = 7,995) 16 Figure 3: Children in Custody on December 31, 2018 by Length of Stay (Total = 7,995) 17 Figure 4 : Children in Custody on December 31, 2018 by Placement Type 18 Figure 5: New ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Care Homes Developed by Month, July - December 2018 19 Figure 6: New ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Homes by Type, July – December 2018 (N=360) 20 Figure 7: New Therapeutic ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Homes by Month, July 2018-December 2018 29 Figure 8: Worker Caseloads: Percent of Workers Meeting Caseload Standards 40 Figure 9: Supervisor Workloads: Percent of Supervisors Meeting Workload Standards 45 Figure 10: Metrics 5.1 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 0 - 1 47 Figure 11: Metric 5.2 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 2 – 5 48 Figure 12: Metric 5.3 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 6 – 12 49 Figure 13: Metric 5.4 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 13 and Older 50 Figure 14: Metric 1a – Absence of Maltreatment in Care by Resource Caregivers 58 Figure 15: Metric 1b – Absence of Maltreatment in Care by Parents 60 Figure 16: Rate of MIC by Placement Type, Current and Prior Report Periods 61 Figure 17: Metric 3.1 – Frequency of Visits by All Workers 73 Figure 18: Metric 3.2 – Frequency of Primary Worker Visits 74 Figure 19: Metric 3.3b – Continuity of Primary Worker Visits Over Six Months 75 Figure 20: Metric 6.2a – Permanency within 12 Months of Removal 86 Figure 21: Metric 6.2b – Permanency within 2 years of Removal 90 Figure 22: Metric 6.2c – Permanency within 3 years of Removal 92 Figure 23: Metric 6.2d – Permanency within 4 years of Removal 94 Figure 24: Metric 6.3 – Re-entry within 12 Months of Exit 95 Figure 25: Metric 6.5 – Permanency Performance 96 Figure 26: Metric 6.6 – Permanency Performance 98 Figure 27: Metric 6.7 – Permanency Performance 101 Figure 28: Metric 6.4 – Permanency Performance 104 Table 1: Summary of Target Outcomes 7 Table 2: Traditional Home Closure Reasons, July – December 2018 23 Table 3: Applications For TFC Program Authorization with New Application Form 32 Table 4: Summary of Authorization Denial Reasons, Oct to Dec 2018 34 Table 5: Pinnacle Plan Caseload and Workload Standard Commitments 39 Table 6: Caseload Compliance of Eight Struggling Districts 41 Table 7: Caseload Compliance by Worker Type 42 Table 8: Workload Spikes, Fall 2016, 2017 and 2018 44 Table 9: Caseload Compliance, Fall 2016, 2017 and 2018 44 Table 10: Child-Nights in Shelters by Age, Change from Baseline to Current Period 51 Table 11: Pinnacle Plan 1.17: July 2018 to December 2018 51 Table 12: Youth with More than One Shelter Stay during Period (N=118) 52 Table 13: Rate of MIC by Placement Type, Current and Prior Report Periods 61 Table 14: Placement Stability Baselines, Targets, and Current Performance 77 Table 15: Percent of Children Whose First Countable Placement is a Kinship Home 78 Table 16: First Placement of Children Removed between July and December 2018 83 Table 17: Top Three Exit Reasons for First Placement Moves 83 Table 18: Measure 6.2b, Permanency Rates by Report Period Children Who Achieved Permanency within 2 years (Most Recent on Left Side) 91 Table 19: Measure 6.2c, Permanency Rates by Report Period Children Who Achieved Permanency within 3 years (Most Recent on Left Side) 93 Table 20: Number of Children who became Legally Free Each Report Period under Metric 6.5 97 Table 21: Metric 6.6 - Trial Adoption Disruptions by Placement/Quad Type 99 Table 22: Metric 6.1 – Permanency Performance 102 Appendix A: Metric Plan Baselines and Targets (Updated September 2015) 107

FIGURES. Figure 1: Number of Children in DHS Custody at the End of SFY - 2004 to 2019 15 2018 16 Figure 2: Children in Custody on December 31June 30, 2018 by Age Group (Total = 7,995) 16 17 Figure 3: Children in Custody on December 31June 30, 2018 by Length of Stay (Total = 7,995) 17 18 Figure 4 : Children in Custody on December 31June 30, 2018 by Placement Type 18 19 Figure 5: New ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Care Homes Developed by Month, July - December 2017-June 2018 19 20 Figure 6: New ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Homes by Type, July – December 2017-June 2018 (N=360) 20 21 Figure 7: New Therapeutic ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Homes by Month, July 20182017-December June 2018 29 33 Figure 8: Worker Caseloads: Percent of Workers Meeting Caseload Standards 40 43 Figure 9: Supervisor Workloads: Percent of Supervisors Meeting Workload Standards 45 48 Figure 10: Metrics 5.1 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 0 - 1 47 51 Figure 11: Metric 5.2 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 2 – 5 48 52 Figure 12: Metric 5.3 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 6 – 12 49 53 Figure 13: Metric 5.4 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 13 and Older 50 Old 54 Figure 14: Number of Children Six Years and Older with a Shelter Stay Jan 2015 to June 2018 55 Figure 15: Metric 1a – Absence of Maltreatment in Care by Resource Caregivers 58 64 Figure 1516: Metric 1b – Absence of Maltreatment in Care by Parents 60 Figure 16: Rate of MIC by Placement Type, Current and Prior Report Periods 61 66 Figure 17: Metric 3.1 – Frequency of Visits by All Workers 73 81 Figure 18: Metric 3.2 – Frequency of Primary Worker Visits 74 82 Figure 19: Metric 3.3b – Continuity of Primary Worker Visits Over Six Months 75 83 Figure 20: Metric 6.2a – Permanency within 12 Months of Removal 86 94 Figure 21: Reduction in Short-Term Removals 95 Figure 22: Metric 6.2b – Permanency within 2 years of Removal 90 100 Figure 2223: Metric 6.2c – Permanency within 3 years of Removal 92 102 Figure 2324: Metric 6.2d – Permanency within 4 years of Removal 94 104 Figure 2425: Metric 6.3 – Re-entry within 12 Months of Exit 95 105 Figure 2526: Metric 6.5 – Permanency Performance 96 106 Figure 2627: Metric 6.6 – Permanency Performance 98 108 Figure 2728: Metric 6.7 – Permanency Performance 101 110 Figure 2829: Metric 6.4 – Permanency Performance 104 113 Table 1: Summary of Target Outcomes 7 8 Table 2: Traditional Home Closure Reasons, July – December 2017-June 2018 23 26 Table 3: Applications For TFC Program Authorization with New Application Form 32 Home Closure Reason Responses to Exit Survey Question #1? 28 Table 4: Summary of Authorization Denial Reasons, Oct to Dec 2018 34 Table 5: Pinnacle Plan Caseload and Workload Standard Commitments 39 41 Table 5: Caseload Compliance by Worker Type – June 30, 2018 44 Table 6: Caseload Compliance of Eight Struggling Districts 41 46 Table 7: Number of workers with a Caseload Compliance by Worker Type 42 over 200%, 2014 to 2018 47 Table 8: Workload Spikes, Fall 2016, 2017 and 2018 44 Table 9: Caseload Compliance, Fall 2016, 2017 and 2018 44 Table 10: Child-Nights in Shelters by Age, Change from Baseline January 2018 to Current Period 51 June 2018 54 Table 119: Pinnacle Plan 1.17: July June 2017 to June 2018 to December 2018 51 56 Table 1210: Youth with More than One Shelter Stay during Period (N=118) 52 56 Table 1311: Total Children who Experienced a Shelter Stay, January to June 2018 61 Table 12: Rate of MIC by Placement Type, Current and Prior Report Periods 61 67 Table 1413: Placement Stability Baselines, Targets, and Current Performance 77 85 Table 1514: Percent of Children Whose First Countable Placement is a Kinship Home 78 87 Table 1615: First Placement of Children Removed between July January and December June 2018 83 92 Table 1716: Top Three Exit Reasons for First Placement Moves 83 92 Table 1817: Measure 6.2b, Permanency Rates by Report Period Children Who Achieved Permanency within 2 years (Most Recent on Left Side) 91 101 Table 1918: Measure 6.2c, Permanency Rates by Report Period Children Who Achieved Permanency within 3 years (Most Recent on Left Side) 93 103 Table 2019: Number of Children who became Legally Free Each Report Period under Metric 6.5 97 107 Table 21: Metric 6.6 - Trial Adoption Disruptions by Placement/Quad Type 99 Table 2220: Metric 6.1 – Permanency Performance 102 111 Appendix A: Metric Plan Baselines and Targets (Updated September 2015) 107115 Appendix B: ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Care Survey Results 124 Appendix C: ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Home Closure Reason Instruction 131 Appendix D: TFC Treatment Team Guide 132 Appendix E: Shelter Authorization Form 134 Appendix F: Progressive Shelter Staffing Guide 138 Appendix G: MIC Expanded Core Strategies 141 Appendix H: MIC Heightened Placement Protocols in Group Homes 145 Glossary 1: Acronyms 147

FIGURES. Figure 1: Number of Children in DHS Custody at the End of SFY - 2004 to 2019 15 2020 18 Figure 2: Children in Custody on December 31June 30, 2018 2020 by Age Group (Total = 7,9957,730) 16 19 Figure 3: Children in Custody Care on December 31June 30, 2018 2020 by Length of Stay (Total = 7,9957,730) 17 20 Figure 4 4: Children in Custody Care on December 31June 30, 2018 2020 by Placement Type 18 (Total = 7,730) 21 Figure 5: New ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Care Homes Developed by Month, July - December 2018 19 2019 – June 2020 22 Figure 6: New ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Homes by Type, July 2019 – December 2018 June 2020 (N=360N=832) 20 23 Figure 7: New Therapeutic ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Homes by Month, July 2018-December 2018 29 2019 – June 2020 32 Figure 8: Worker Caseloads: Percent of Workers Meeting Caseload Standards 40 46 Figure 9: Supervisor Workloads: Percent of Supervisors Meeting Workload Standards 45 53 Figure 10: Metrics 5.1 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 0 - 1 47 57 Figure 11: Metric 5.2 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 2 – 5 48 58 Figure 12: Metric 5.3 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 6 – 12 49 59 Figure 13: Metric 5.4 – Shelter-Nights, Children Ages 13 and Older 50 60 Figure 14: Metric 1a – Absence of Maltreatment in Care by Resource Caregivers 58 67 Figure 15: Metric 1b – Absence of Maltreatment in Care by Parents 60 68 Figure 16: Rate of MIC by Placement Type, Current and Prior Report Periods 61 Figure 17: Metric 3.1 – Frequency of Visits by All Workers 73 83 Figure 1817: Metric 3.2 – Frequency of Primary Worker Visits 74 85 Figure 1918: Metric 3.3b – Continuity of Primary Worker Visits Over Six Months 75 86 Figure 2019: Metric 6.2a – Permanency within 12 Months of Removal 86 99 Figure 2120: Metric 6.2b – Permanency within 2 years of Removal 90 107 Figure 2221: Metric 6.2c – Permanency within 3 years of Removal 92 109 Figure 2322: Metric 6.2d – Permanency within 4 years of Removal 94 111 Figure 2423: Metric 6.3 – Re-entry within 12 Months of Exit 95 112 Figure 2524: Metric 6.5 – Permanency Performance 96 113 Figure 2625: Metric 6.6 – Permanency Performance 98 116 Figure 2726: Metric 6.7 – Permanency Performance 101 119 Figure 2827: Metric 6.4 – Permanency Performance 104 122 Table 1: Summary of Target Outcomes 7 9 Table 2: Traditional Home Closure Reasons, July 2019 – December 2018 23 June 2020 26 Table 3: Applications For TFC Program for TFC/ITFC Placement and Service Authorization with New Application Form 32 36 Table 4: Summary Needs Analysis – Number of Authorization Denial Reasons, Oct to Dec 2018 34 Children Who Require Therapeutic Placements 40 Table 5: Pinnacle Plan Caseload and Workload Standard Commitments 39 45 Table 6: End of Period, Point in Time Caseload Compliance of Eight Struggling Districts 41 46 Table 7: Caseload Worker Caseloads Capacity and Compliance by Worker Type 42 as of June 30, 2020 49 Table 8: Workload Spikes, Fall 2016, 2017 and 2018 44 Table 9: Caseload Compliance, Fall 2016, 2017 and 2018 44 Table 10: Child-Nights in Shelters by Age, Change from Baseline to Current Period 51 January 2020 – June 2020 61 Table 119: Pinnacle Plan 1.17: July 2018 to December 2018 51 Baseline and January – June 2020 62 Table 12: Youth with More than One Shelter Stay during Period (N=118) 52 Table 1310: Rate of MIC by Placement Type, Current Current, Last and Prior Report Periods 61 69 Table 11: MIC Investigation Case Review, January – December 2019 71 Table 12: Analysis of Quality Visits in MIC Case Reviews, Jan-Dec 2019 72 Table 13: Required Monthly Visits Conducted Face to Face vs. Virtually 83 Table 14: Placement Stability Baselines, Targets, and Current Performance 77 88 Table 15: Percent of Children Whose First Countable Placement is a Kinship Home 78 90 Table 16: First Placement Comparison of Children Removed between July Federal and December 2018 83 Oklahoma Measures for Timely Permanency 97 Table 17: Top Three Exit Reasons for First Placement Moves 83 Measure 6.2a, Permanency Rates by Report Period 100 Table 18: Measure 6.2b, Permanency Rates by Report Period Children Who Achieved Permanency within 2 years (Most Recent on Left Side) 91 107 Table 19: Measure 6.2c, Permanency Rates by Report Period Children Who Achieved Permanency within 3 years (Most Recent on Left Side) 93 109 Table 20: Number of Children who became Legally Free Each Report Period under Metric 6.5 97 114 Table 21: Metric 6.6 - Trial Adoption Disruptions by Placement/Quad Type 99 117 Table 22: Metric 6.1 – Permanency Performance 102 120 Appendix A: Metric Plan Baselines and Targets (Updated September 2015) 107125