Final Evaluation Rating Clause Samples

Final Evaluation Rating. The final summative evaluation rating that is assigned to a teacher based on the holistic review of all Evaluation Factors observed and evidence obtained during the Evaluation Cycle. The rating shall be “accomplished,” “skilled,” “developing,” or “ineffective.” The final rating shall not be weighted in such a way that one (1) component of the evaluation system has a higher importance than another, except that any area marked N/A shall not negatively impact the evaluation.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Final Evaluation Rating. Each employee will receive a Final Evaluation Rating of 1 (Unsatisfactory), 2 (Basic), 3 (Proficient) or 4 (Distinguished), which combines his or her State Criteria Rating and Student Growth Score using the Evaluation Scoring and Rating Guide. 12.4.5.1 Examine extenuating circumstances possibly including: goal setting process/expectations, student attendance, and curriculum/assessment alignment. 12.4.5.2 Conduct two (2) additional thirty-minute (30) observations. 12.4.5.3 Schedule monthly conferences with evaluator to discuss/revise goals, progress toward meeting goals, and best practices. 12.4.5.4 Create and implement a professional development plan to address student growth areas.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Final Evaluation Rating. The final, summative holistic rating that is assigned to a teacher based on evaluations that are conducted pursuant to the terms of this agreement. The evaluation rating is assigned at the conclusion of the evaluation cycle. Each completed evaluation will result in the assignment of a teacher to one of the following evaluation ratings: Accomplished, Skilled, Developing or Ineffective. Ineffective Developing Skilled Accomplished • Professional Growth/Improvement Plan • Formal Holistic Observation Followed by Conference • Classroom Walkthroughs • Formal Focused Observation Emphasis on Focus Area(s) • Final Summative Conference • Professional Growth Plan • One Observation • One Conference with Discussion of Progress on PGP
View Source

Related to Final Evaluation Rating

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.

  • FINANCIAL EVALUATION (a) The financial bid shall be opened of only those bidders who have been found to be technically eligible. The financial bids shall be opened in presence of representatives of technically eligible bidders, who may like to be present. The institute shall inform the date, place and time for opening of financial bid. (b) Arithmetical errors shall be rectified on the following basis. If there is a discrepancy between the unit price and total price that is, the unit price shall prevail and the total price shall be corrected by the Institute. If there is a discrepancy between words and figures, the lesser amount shall be considered as valid. If the Supplier does not accept the correction of the errors, his bid shall be rejected. (c) The AIIMS Jodhpur does not bind himself to accept the lowest bid or any bid and reserves the right of accepting the whole or any part of the bid or portion of the job offered; and the bidder shall provide the same at the rates quoted. The AIIMS Jodhpur reserves the right to reject any or all offers received in response to tender or cancel or withdraw the tender notice without assigning any reason, whatsoever.