Final Outcome Clause Samples

The "Final Outcome" clause defines the conclusive result or resolution of a process, dispute, or agreement as recognized by the parties involved. Typically, this clause specifies when a decision, judgment, or settlement is considered binding and no longer subject to appeal or further challenge. For example, it may state that an arbitration award or court judgment is final and enforceable once issued. The core function of this clause is to provide certainty and closure by establishing a clear endpoint, thereby preventing ongoing disputes or repeated litigation over the same matter.
Final Outcome. This section should include: A final assessment of the satisfactory or unsatisfactory achievement of the program.
View SourceView Similar (9)
Final Outcome. A model for a training program based off the grounded recommendations of OB-GYN fellows.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Final Outcome. The Land Release Contractor has / has not achieved operational accreditation on (insert date). Signature: (Demining Project Office) Signature: (Land Release Contractor) Date NMAA informed:
View Source
Final Outcome. Pursuant to the settlement efforts initiated by the CLB vide its order dated September 22, 2008, the Parikhs agreed to sell 18.18% shareholding in Zandu to Emami. Accordingly, Emami acquired, through a share purchase agreement dated October 15, 2008 (the day on which the open offer closed) 18.18% of the shareholding of Zandu at a price of Rs 15,000 (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) per share and also paid a non-compete fee to Parikhs of Rs 1,500 (Rupees Fifteen hundred only) per equity share. Also Emami acquired through open market purchases stake in Zandu on October 15, 2008. Pursuant to the aforesaid acquisition from the Parikhs and the purchases from open market along with the acquisition of shares in the open offer, Emami secured 70.34% stake in Zandu in the following manner.
View Source

Related to Final Outcome

  • Outcome Include the following: 1) evaluation of project’s ability to meet goals and expected performance measures and provide explanation for why goals were not met, if applicable; 2) identify successful outcomes, areas for improvement, and quantifiable metrics (including the assigned metric in Exhibit A, if applicable) as a result of the project; and 3) final project photos, if an implementation construction project.

  • Default – Reprocurement Costs In case of Contract breach by Contractor, resulting in termination by the County, the County may procure the goods and/or services from other sources. If the cost for those goods and/or services is higher than under the terms of the existing Contract, Contractor will be responsible for paying the County the difference between the Contract cost and the price paid, and the County may deduct this cost from any unpaid balance due the Contractor. The price paid by the County shall be the prevailing market price at the time such purchase is made. This is in addition to any other remedies available under this Contract and under law.

  • Outcomes Secondary: Career pathway students will: have career goals designated on SEOP, earn concurrent college credit while in high school, achieve a state competency certificate and while completing high school graduation requirements.

  • Name Collision Occurrence Assessment 6.2.1 Registry Operator shall not activate any names in the DNS zone for the Registry TLD except in compliance with a Name Collision Occurrence Assessment provided by ICANN regarding the Registry TLD. Registry Operator will either (A) implement the mitigation measures described in its Name Collision Occurrence Assessment before activating any second-­‐level domain name, or (B) block those second-­‐level domain names for which the mitigation measures as described in the Name Collision Occurrence Assessment have not been implemented and proceed with activating names that are not listed in the Assessment. 6.2.2 Notwithstanding subsection 6.2.1, Registry Operator may proceed with activation of names in the DNS zone without implementation of the measures set forth in Section 6.2.1 only if (A) ICANN determines that the Registry TLD is eligible for this alternative path to activation of names; and (B) Registry Operator blocks all second-­‐level domain names identified by ICANN and set forth at <▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/en/announcements-­‐and-­‐ media/announcement-­‐2-­‐17nov13-­‐en> as such list may be modified by ICANN from time to time. Registry Operator may activate names pursuant to this subsection and later activate names pursuant to subsection 6.2.1. 6.2.3 The sets of names subject to mitigation or blocking pursuant to Sections 6.2.1 and 6.2.2 will be based on ICANN analysis of DNS information including "Day in the Life of the Internet" data maintained by the DNS Operations, Analysis, and Research Center (DNS-­‐OARC) <▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇-­‐▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇>. 6.2.4 Registry Operator may participate in the development by the ICANN community of a process for determining whether and how these blocked names may be released. 6.2.5 If ICANN determines that the TLD is ineligible for the alternative path to activation of names, ICANN may elect not to delegate the TLD pending completion of the final Name Collision Occurrence Assessment for the TLD, and Registry Operator’s completion of all required mitigation measures. Registry Operator understands that the mitigation measures required by ICANN as a condition to activation of names in the DNS zone for the TLD may include, without limitation, mitigation measures such as those described in Section 3.2 of the New gTLD Name Collision Occurrence Management Plan approved by the ICANN Board New gTLD Program Committee (NGPC) on 7 October 2013 as found at <▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-­‐ new-­‐gtld-­‐annex-­‐1-­‐07oct13-­‐en.pdf>.

  • Goods Inspection The Commissioner of DAS, in consultation with the Client Agency, shall determine the manner and prescribe the inspection of all Goods and the tests of all samples submitted to determine whether they comply with all of the specifications in the Contract. If any Goods fail in any way to meet the specifications in the Contract, the Client Agency or the Commissioner of DAS may, in its sole discretion, either reject it and owe nothing or accept it and pay for it on an adjusted price basis, depending on the degree to which the Goods meet the specifications. Any decision pertaining to any such failure or rejection shall be final and binding.