Final Recommendations Clause Samples
The 'Final Recommendations' clause outlines the process and content for delivering the conclusive advice or findings at the end of a project, engagement, or review. Typically, this clause specifies the format, timing, and responsible parties for submitting the final recommendations, and may detail any required supporting documentation or follow-up actions. Its core function is to ensure that all parties receive clear, actionable guidance or decisions, thereby providing closure and a basis for subsequent steps or implementation.
Final Recommendations. All recommendations shall be forwarded to the President, who will make his or her recommendations to be acted upon by the Board of Trustees.
Final Recommendations. (a) At least ten (10) calendar days before the Committee meeting for which Allocations will be awarded, the final list of Applicants for which Allocations will be recommended (and the amounts of those Allocations) will be posted. During competitive rounds, the list will be in ranked order. This list will reflect changes, if any, in ranking resulting from the appeals as provided in section 50365035. The list shall be posted on the Committee’s website as provided in section 5140. Note: Authority cited: Section 8869.94, Government Code. Reference: Section 8869.84(c), Government Code.
Final Recommendations. During the process, the WFP Custody evaluator/consultant will ask questions to gather information on your child and family so that they can develop final recommendations that are the best fit for your child/family. The WFP custody evaluator/consultant may ask probative question or have probative discussions to explore possibilities with you regarding what options might be in the best interests of your child and family unit. During the evaluation process, the custody evaluator/consultant may review the pros and cons of many options, and may ask you what options you would be willing to participate in, should they become a final recommendation. It is important that you keep in mind that the discussion of a possible option does not make that option a direct recommendation. All final recommendations will be included in the final summary and/or comprehensive evaluation report.
Final Recommendations. LWC will summarize the feedback and consensus from the Study Session and incorporate comments into the final recommendations for the amended IHO. LWC assumes that the City Attorney will review Tasks 8.1 to 8.3 and that these comments will be combined Staff comments. • Approach Memo Inclusionary Housing Program Amendments (Administrative Draft, Public Review Draft, and Final) • Prepare for and attend Study Session Task 9: CEQA (Environmental Analysis) (NEW)
Final Recommendations. The EPS Team assumes that City decision-makers will accept the Study’s major policy recommendations and that suggested revisions will focus on refining finer points of the policies and programs. However, EPS recognizes that Task 8 outreach, evolving legislation and legal perspectives, ongoing City initiatives (e.g., Development Impact Fee Update), and other factors may raise issues that should be addressed before the inclusionary housing policy is finalized. In Task 9, EPS will collaborate with staff to refine policy recommendation and may conduct additional research and analysis needed to address questions, concerns, or comments on the working draft policy. EPS has allocated 40 hours of staff time to refining recommendations. The proposed budget includes an additional 20 hours of EPS staff time for supplementary research and analysis. Task 10 Draft Code Language EPS will draft municipal code language that fully describes the consensus Inclusionary Housing Policy, including refinements and adjustments identified during Task 9. The code will be authored to be consistent with existing City of Emeryville law, but formal consistency review and finalization of the Inclusionary Housing Policy will be the responsibility of the City of Emeryville. EPS will accept one round of consolidated comments on the draft code language, address comments, and deliver revised draft code to the City.
Final Recommendations. Research should be conducted to benefit the health of the nation, and results should be reported widely in appropriate layperson’s terms to aid consumers in making positive choices toward healthier lifestyles. The psychological effects of obesity should be closely observed such that more can be understood about consumer behaviors and attitudes regarding food and physical activity. The observed behaviors can then be used to explain consumer choices, and to suggest strategies that can help guide consumers to healthier food choices through small changes. Research on mass communications, such as television and radio, must be performed to analyze the most effective techniques for educating the public. Studies should endeavor to determine which methods of communication the public most readily responds to and influences positive food choices and physical activity levels. Proposed educational methods for a healthy lifestyle include distributing newsletters and the use of the Internet; finding the most successful means of contact with the public could possibly ensure a higher percentage of public aspiration to a healthy lifestyle. The medical industry’s involvement in combating obesity plays a vital role in intervention. Researching more medical alternatives would allow a larger percentage of the population to access safer treatment. Current procedures such as gastric bypass surgery, the lap band surgery, and stomach stapling are available for the morbidly obese. All of these alternatives can come with major health complications; nevertheless, the surgeries provide a new chance at life. Another alternative to weight loss is diet pills. Dietary supplements may help users lose weight quickly, but they usually have adverse effects. Researchers should be encouraged to conduct studies on the current diet pill products being sold as well as studies that would find safer, more effective medicines for the treatment of obesity in the long term. Food corporations have a responsibility to research how to manufacture their products in the healthiest way possible. Products should have a high quality taste without sacrificing the nutritional value or raising the amount of preparation time and cost. Studies should be conducted that emphasize use of the healthiest ingredients that preserve a similar or exact taste to the original product. Agribusiness should conduct studies to lower the cost of produce and health foods along with safe genetic modifications to improve the nutrition...
Final Recommendations. Relevant maps, statistics, and supporting text summarize methodology, opportunities, challenges, and recommended outcomes.
Final Recommendations