Common use of FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS Clause in Contracts

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) SBC and NOS are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13- 202 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) SBC and NOS have entered into an Amendment to an Agreement dated as of July 10, 2003, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (4) the recitals of fact and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact; (5) the Agreement between SBC and NOS does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement; (6) in order to assure that the Agreement is in the public interest, SBC should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified Petition. The Chief Clerk shall place the Agreement on the Commission’s website under Interconnection Agreements; (7) SBC should also place replacement sheets in its tariffs at the following location: Ill.C.C. No. 21 Section 19.15; (8) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; (9) approval of the Agreement does not have any precedential effect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission Orders.

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) the Commission has jurisdiction of the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (2) SBC Illinois and NOS American Farm Bureau are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13- 13-202 of the Public Utilities Act; (23) On August 3, 2005 , SBC Illinois and NOS have American Farm Bureau entered into an Amendment to an Agreement dated as of July 10, 2003Agreement, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (4) the recitals of fact and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact; (5) the Agreement between SBC Illinois and NOS American Farm Bureau, does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the AgreementAgreement and it is not contrary to the public interest, convenience and necessity; (6) in order to assure that the Agreement is in the public interest, SBC Illinois should implement the Agreement by filing filing, within five (5) days from the date the Agreement is approved, a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, Commission stating that the approved agreement Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified Verified Petition. The Chief Clerk shall place the Agreement on the Commission’s website web site under Interconnection Agreements; (7) SBC Illinois should also place replacement sheets in its tariffs at the following location: Ill.C.C. Agreements with Telecommunications Carriers: Ill. No. 21 16 Section 19.1518; (8) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; (9) approval of the Agreement does not have any precedential effect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission Orders.

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) the Commission has jurisdiction of the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (2) SBC Illinois and NOS TDS Metrocom, Inc. are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13- 13-202 of the Public Utilities Act; (23) on January 10, 2003, SBC Illinois and NOS have TDS Metrocom, Inc. entered into an Amendment to an Agreement dated as of July 10, 2003Agreement, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (4) the recitals of fact and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact; (5) the Agreement between SBC Illinois and NOS TDS Metrocom, Inc. does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the AgreementAgreement and it is not contrary to the public interest, convenience and necessity; (6) in order to assure that the Agreement is in the public interest, SBC Illinois should implement the Agreement by filing filing, within five (5) days from the date the Agreement is approved, a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, Commission stating that the approved agreement Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified Verified Petition. The Chief Clerk shall place the Agreement on the Commission’s website web site under Interconnection Agreements; (7) SBC Illinois should also place replacement sheets in its tariffs at the following location: Ill.C.C. Agreements with Telecommunications Carriers: Ill. No. 21 Section 19.15; (8) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; (9) approval of the Agreement does not have any precedential effect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission Orders.

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record and being fully advised in the premisesherein, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) SBC Ameritech and NOS Premiere are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13- 13-202 of the Public Utilities Act, (220 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq.) which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) SBC and NOS have entered into an Amendment to an Agreement dated as of July 10, 2003, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over of the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (43) the recitals of fact facts recited and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of factfact and law; (54) the Agreement between SBC and NOS does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the AgreementAgreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience and necessity; (65) in order to assure that the implementation of the Agreement is in the public interest, SBC Ameritech should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved agreement Agreement is the same as the Agreement that was filed in this docket with the verified Petition. The petition; the Chief Clerk shall should place the Agreement on the Commission’s website 's web site under Interconnection Agreements; (76) SBC within five (5) days of the entry of this Order, Ameritech should also place replacement sheets in modify its tariffs at to reference the following location: Ill.C.C. No. 21 Section 19.15negotiated Agreement in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (8) 7) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; (9) 8) approval of the this Agreement does not have any precedential effect affect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission Orders.

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record and being fully advised in the premisesherein, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) SBC Ameritech and NOS Bullseye are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13- 13-202 of the Public Utilities Act, (220 ILCS 5/1-101 et seq.) which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) SBC and NOS have entered into an Amendment to an Agreement dated as of July 10, 2003, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over of the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (43) the recitals of fact facts recited and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of factfact and law; (54) the Agreement between SBC and NOS does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the AgreementAgreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience and necessity; (65) in order to assure that the implementation of the Agreement is in the public interest, SBC Ameritech should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five ten (510) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved agreement Agreement is the same as the Agreement that was filed in this docket with the verified Petition. The petition; the Chief Clerk shall should place the Agreement on the Commission’s website 's web site under Interconnection Agreements; (76) SBC within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order, Ameritech should also place replacement sheets in modify its tariffs at to reference the following location: Ill.C.C. No. 21 Section 19.15negotiated Agreement in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (8) 7) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; (9) 8) approval of the this Agreement does not have any precedential effect affect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission Orders.

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) SBC and NOS Clearwave are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13- 13-202 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) SBC and NOS Clearwave have entered into an Amendment to an Agreement dated as of July 10April 30, 2003, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (4) the recitals of fact and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact; (5) the Amendment to the Agreement between SBC and NOS Clearwave does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement; (6) in order to assure that the Agreement Amendment is in the public interest, SBC should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified Petition. The Chief Clerk shall place the Agreement Amendment on the Commission’s website under Interconnection Agreements; (7) SBC should also place replacement sheets in its tariffs at the following location: Ill.C.C. No. 21 Section 19.15; (8) the Amendment to the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; (9) approval of the Amendment to the Agreement does not have any precedential effect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission Orders.

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record herein and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) SBC Verizon and NOS Cincinnati Bell are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13- 13-202 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) SBC Verizon and NOS Cincinnati Bell have entered into an Amendment to an Agreement dated as of July 10, 2003their Agreement, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996Act; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (4) the recitals of fact and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact; (5) the Agreement Amendment between SBC Verizon and NOS Cincinnati Bell does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the AgreementAmendment; (6) in order to assure that the Agreement Amendment is in the public interest, SBC ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ should implement the Agreement Amendment by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, stating that the approved agreement Amendment is the same as the Agreement Amendment filed in this docket with the verified Petitionpetition. The Chief Clerk shall place the Agreement Amendment on the Commission’s website under Interconnection Agreements; (7) SBC Verizon should also place replacement sheets reference the Amendment in its tariffs at in the following locationsection: Ill.C.C. Agreements with Telecommunications Carriers (ICC No. 21 10 Section 19.1518); (8) the Agreement Amendment should be approved as hereinafter set forth;; and (9) approval of the Agreement Amendment does not have any precedential effect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission Orders.

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) SBC Verizon and NOS are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13- 202 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) SBC and NOS Navigator have entered into an Amendment to an Agreement dated as of July 10Amendment, 2003effective December 1, 2005, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (32) the Commission has jurisdiction over of the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (43) the recitals of fact facts recited and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact; (54) the Agreement instant No. 2 Amendment between SBC Verizon and NOS Navigator does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the AgreementAmendment; (65) in order to assure that the Agreement Amendment is in the public interest, SBC Verizon should implement the Agreement Amendment by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, indicating that the approved agreement amendment is the same as the Agreement Amendment filed in this docket with the verified Petitionpetition. The Chief Clerk shall place the Agreement Amendment on the Commission’s website under Interconnection Agreements; (76) SBC Verizon should also place replacement sheets in its tariffs at the following location: Ill.C.C. No. 21 10, Section 19.1518; (8) 7) the Agreement Amendment should be approved as hereinafter set forth; (9) 8) approval of the Agreement Amendment does not have any precedential effect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission Orders.

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) SBC IBT and NOS Sigecom are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13- 13-202 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) SBC IBT and NOS Sigecom have entered into an Amendment to an their Interconnection Agreement dated as of July 10February 18, 20032008, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over of the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (4) the recitals of fact and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact; (5) the Amendment to the Agreement between SBC IBT and NOS Sigecom does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the AgreementAmendment; (6) in order to assure that the Agreement Amendment is in the public interest, SBC IBT should implement the Agreement Amendment by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved agreement amendment is the same as the Agreement Amendment filed in this docket with the verified Petitionpetition. The Chief Clerk shall place the Agreement Amendment on the Commission’s website under Interconnection Agreements; (7) SBC IBT should also place replacement sheets in its tariffs at to the following location: Ill.C.C. extent necessary to effectuate the Amendment (including, specifically, Agreements with Telecommunications Carriers, ICC No. 21 Section 19.1516, Sec. 18); (8) the Agreement Amendment should be approved as hereinafter set forth; (9) approval of the Agreement Amendment does not have any precedential effect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission Orders.

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) SBC and NOS UStel are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13- 202 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) SBC and NOS UStel have entered into an Amendment to an Agreement dated as of July 1025, 20032005, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (4) the recitals of fact and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact; (5) the Agreement Amendment between SBC and NOS UStel does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the AgreementAmendment; (6) in order to assure that the Agreement Amendment is in the public interest, SBC should implement the Agreement Amendment by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved agreement amendment is the same as the Agreement Amendment filed in this docket with the verified Petition. The Chief Clerk shall place the Agreement Amendment on the Commission’s website under Interconnection Agreements; (7) SBC should also place replacement sheets in its tariffs at the following location: Ill.C.C. No. 21 16 Section 19.1518; (8) the Agreement Amendment should be approved as hereinafter set forth; (9) approval of the Agreement Amendment does not have any precedential effect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission Orders.

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record herein and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) SBC IBTC and NOS Onvoy LLC are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13- 202 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) SBC IBTC and NOS Onvoy LLC have entered into an Amendment to an Interconnection Agreement dated as of July 10on August 22, 20032014, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over of the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (4) the recitals of fact and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact; (5) the Agreement between SBC IBTC and NOS Onvoy LLC does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement; (6) in order to assure that the Agreement is in the public interest, SBC IBTC should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved agreement Agreement is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified Petitionpetition, as amended by the Joint Petitioners’ stipulation. The Chief Clerk shall place the Agreement on the Commission’s website under Interconnection Agreements; (7) SBC Citizens should also place replacement sheets in its tariffs at the following location: Ill.C.C. No. 21 16 Section 19.1518; (8) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; (9) approval of the Agreement does not have any precedential effect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission Orders.

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record and being fully advised in the premisesherein, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) SBC and NOS Cinergy are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13- 13-202 of the Public Utilities Act, which provide telecommunications services as defined in Section 13-203 of the Act; (2) SBC and NOS have entered into an Amendment to an Agreement dated as of July 10, 2003, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (43) the recitals of fact facts recited and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of factfact and law; (54) the Agreement between SBC and NOS amendment does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the AgreementAgreement and is not contrary to the public interest, convenience, and necessity; (65) in order to assure that the Agreement implementation of the amendment is in the public interest, SBC should implement the Agreement amendment by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved agreement amendment is the same as the Agreement amendment filed in this docket with the verified Petition. The petition; the Chief Clerk shall should place the Agreement amendment on the Commission’s website web site under “Interconnection Agreements"; (6) within five days of the entry of this Order, SBC should modify its tariff to reference the negotiated amendment in the manner recommended by Staff and described in the prefatory portion of this Order above; (7) SBC should also place replacement sheets in its tariffs at the following location: Ill.C.C. No. 21 Section 19.15; (8) the Agreement amendment should be approved as hereinafter set forth;; and (9) 8) approval of the Agreement this amendment does not have any precedential effect affect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission Ordersorders.

FINDINGS AND ORDERING PARAGRAPHS. The Commission, having considered the entire record and being fully advised in the premises, is of the opinion and finds that: (1) SBC and NOS Oneida are telecommunications carriers as defined in Section 13- 13-202 of the Public Utilities Act; (2) SBC and NOS Oneida have entered into an Amendment to an a negotiated Traffic Termination Agreement dated as of July 10January 3, 2003, which has been submitted to the Commission for approval under Section 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996; (3) the Commission has jurisdiction over of the parties hereto and the subject matter hereof; (4) the recitals of fact and conclusions reached in the prefatory portion of this Order are supported by the record and are hereby adopted as findings of fact; (5) the Agreement between SBC and NOS Oneida does not discriminate against a telecommunications carrier not a party to the Agreement; (6) in order to assure that the Agreement is in the public interest, SBC should implement the Agreement by filing a verified statement with the Chief Clerk of the Commission, within five (5) days of approval by the Commission, that the approved agreement amendment is the same as the Agreement filed in this docket with the verified Petitionpetition. The Chief Clerk shall place the Agreement on the Commission’s website under Interconnection Agreements; (7) SBC should also place replacement sheets in its tariffs at the following location: Ill.C.C. No. 21 Section 19.15; (8) the Agreement should be approved as hereinafter set forth; (9) approval of the Agreement does not have any precedential effect on any future negotiated agreements or Commission Orders.