FINDINGS OF FACT. 14 1. Respondent is the holder of License No. LMSW-18502 for the practice of social 15 work in Arizona. 16 2. Since 03/01/20, Respondent has been licensed as an LMSW. 17 3. During her investigative interview, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented she worked at 18 various clinics and group homes since obtaining her license. 19 4. This included at least six facilities, including two agencies (“Agency 1” and 20 “Agency 2”). 21 5. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the following in her written response: 22 a. Contrary to the claim, she received supervision from a clinical supervisor 23 (“Supervisor”) while working for Agency 1. 24 6. Respondent subsequently provided a 03/21 Outside Supervisor contract and 25 clinical supervision notes ranging from 03/21 – 10/21. 1 7. Clinical supervision notes included the following: 2 a. A 03/04/21 note where supervisees share information about their agency, the 3 population, experience, and they processed a client. 4 b. A 04/12/21 individual supervision session note noting Respondent came 5 prepared and presented several cases with needed details. 6 c. A 10/21/21 individual supervision session note indicating they discussed 7 cases in depth and therapeutic approaches for them. 8 8. Agency 1 is owned by Respondent’s husband (“Husband”) and business partner 9 (“Business Partner”). 10 9. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the following during her investigative interview: 11 a. Respondent worked with Agency 1 for a few months, but does not recall the 12 dates. 13 b. Her role was like that of a supervisor, in that she handled scheduling, day to 14 day operations, and helped clients get what they needed. 15 c. Respondent did not really have any clients, but received clinical supervision. 16 d. She worked as a support for other therapists and completed intake 17 assessments and treatment plans. 18 e. Respondent sent the clinical supervision notes as proof she was supervised 19 because it was alleged she did not have supervision. 20 10. Despite Respondent representing she did not have a case load of clients, she 21 was involved in the client’s clinical care. 22 11. Respondent initially represented she received clinical supervision at Agency 1, 23 supplying clinical supervision notes appearing to correspond with this employment, and later 24 represented she did not provide therapy services while working for Agency 1 during her 25 investigative interview. 1 12. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the following during her investigative interview: 2 a. Respondent did not really have a direct supervisor at Agency 1. 3 b. If she had questions, she would talk to Business Partner or Husband. 4 c. Respondent did not have a direct supervisor at Agency 2. 5 d. She was receiving supervision from Supervisor, and she did not know that 6 direct and clinical supervision were different things. 7 13. Respondent worked at multiple facilities, one which was owned by Husband, 8 without direct supervision as an associate level licensee. 9 14. Additionally, the clinical supervision contract Respondent and Supervisor utilized 10 did not outline the behavioral health agency the supervision would be for. 11 15. The contract was signed by Husband, as the CEO, Respondent, and Supervisor.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Consent Agreement
FINDINGS OF FACT. 14 8 1. Respondent is the holder of License No. LMSW-18502 LPC-18917 for the practice of social 15 work 9 counseling in the State of Arizona.
16 10 2. Since 03/01/20From 01/23 – 03/23, Respondent has been licensed was employed at Agency as an LMSWa therapist.
17 11 3. During On 03/07/23, Respondent emailed her investigative interview, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented she worked at 18 various clinics and group homes since obtaining notice of resignation with a two weeks’ 12 notice with 03/21/23 being her licenselast day.
19 13 4. This included at least six facilitiesOne 03/07/23, including roughly two agencies (“Agency 1” and hours after Respondent submitted her resignation, 14 Complainant emailed Respondent informing her that they would need to meet one or two times 15 weekly until her departure to plan for the continuity of care for her clients.
16 5. On 03/07/23, several hours later, Respondent emailed Complainant again 17 informing him of her immediate resignation.
18 6. Respondent in fact resigned immediately while she had 37 clients on her 19 caseload, without making any efforts to ensure clients had continuity of care in place or provide 20 “Agency 2”)any sort of appropriate referral.
21 57. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Respondent represented the following in her written responseduring Board staff’s investigative interview:
22 a. Contrary to the claim, Respondent resigned abruptly because she received supervision from a clinical supervisor 23 (“Supervisor”) while working for Agency 1was so ill.
23 b. Respondent did not inform any of her clients if her departure because it was 24 6. Respondent subsequently provided a 03/21 Outside Supervisor contract and 25 clinical supervision notes ranging from 03/21 – 10/21the supervisor’s responsibility.
1 7. Clinical supervision notes included the following:
c. If Respondent is physically unable to work it is not her responsibility to ensure 2 a. A 03/04/21 note where supervisees share information about their agency, the 3 population, experience, and they processed a clientcontinuity of care for her clients.
3 d. Respondent believes she appropriately terminated clients by giving the 4 b. A 04/12/21 individual supervision session note noting Respondent came 5 prepared and presented several cases with needed detailsresponsibility to Complainant.
5 8. Respondent in fact took no steps to contact clients regarding her departure or 6 c. A 10/21/21 individual supervision session note indicating they discussed 7 cases in depth and therapeutic approaches for themensure continuity of care was place prior to her immediate departure.
7 9. On 10/10/23, Board staff received an email from another licensee employed at a 8 8. Agency 1 is owned by Respondent’s husband (“Husband”) and business partner separate agency indicating Respondent resigned effective immediately from this job without any 9 (“Business Partner”)notice.
10 910. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the following during her investigative interview:
Upon review it was observed that Board staff was never aware of this 11 a. employment where Respondent worked with Agency 1 had been employed for a few roughly three months, but does not recall the 12 dates.
13 b. Her role was like that of a supervisor, in that she handled scheduling, day to 14 day operations, and helped clients get what they needed.
15 c. Respondent did not really have any clients, but received clinical supervision.
16 d. She worked as a support for other therapists and completed intake 17 assessments and treatment plans.
18 e. Respondent sent the clinical supervision notes as proof she was supervised 19 because it was alleged she did not have supervision.
20 10. Despite Respondent representing she did not have a case load of clients, she 21 was involved in the client’s clinical care.
22 12 11. Respondent initially represented she received clinical supervision at Agency 1, 23 supplying clinical supervision notes appearing in fact failed to correspond update her employment with this employment, and later 24 represented she did not provide therapy services while working for Agency 1 during her 25 investigative interviewthe Board within 30 13 days of a change in employment as required by Board rules.
1 12. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the following during her investigative interview:
2 a. Respondent did not really have a direct supervisor at Agency 1.
3 b. If she had questions, she would talk to Business Partner or Husband.
4 c. Respondent did not have a direct supervisor at Agency 2.
5 d. She was receiving supervision from Supervisor, and she did not know that 6 direct and clinical supervision were different things.
7 13. Respondent worked at multiple facilities, one which was owned by Husband, 8 without direct supervision as an associate level licensee.
9 14. Additionally, the clinical supervision contract Respondent and Supervisor utilized 10 did not outline the behavioral health agency the supervision would be for.
11 15. The contract was signed by Husband, as the CEO, Respondent, and Supervisor.
Appears in 1 contract
FINDINGS OF FACT. 14 1. Respondent is the holder of License No. LMSW-18502 LMSW-16433 for the practice of social 15 work in Arizona.
16 2. Since 03/01/20From 01/23 – 05/23, Respondent has been licensed as an LMSW.
Complainant received therapeutic services from a 17 3. During her investigative interview, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented she worked at 18 various clinics and group homes since obtaining her license.
19 4. This included at least six facilities, including two agencies behavioral health agency (“Agency 1” and 20 “Agency 2Agency”).
18 3. From the start of Complainant’s treatment, there are were various instances of 19 her expressing an elevated interest in Respondent.
20 4. In a 01/16/23 clinical supervision session note, it is documented that there were 21 concerns regarding Complainant giving disproportionate attention towards Respondent during a 22 session.
23 5. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the following in her written response:
22 a. Contrary to the claimIn group sessions, she received supervision from a clinical supervisor 23 (“Supervisor”) while working for Agency 1Complainant discussed struggling with boundaries.
24 6. In 02/23, Complainant expressed a desire to be friends with Respondent subsequently provided a 03/21 Outside Supervisor contract and outside 25 clinical supervision notes ranging from 03/21 – 10/21of therapy.
1 7. Clinical Between 01/23 – 05/23, Respondent discussed Complainant with her clinical 2 supervisor in approximately eight clinical supervision notes included sessions, noting the following:
2 a. A 03/04/21 note where supervisees share information about their agencyimportance of healthy 3 boundaries, the 3 population, experienceself-disclosures, and they processed a clientethical dilemmas.
4 b. A 04/12/21 individual 8. Despite clinical supervision session note noting discussions and Complainant’s self-disclosures, 5 Respondent came 5 prepared and presented several cases interacted with needed detailsComplainant over text message, unprompted at times, between 6 02/23 – 05/23.
6 c. A 10/21/21 individual supervision session note indicating they discussed 7 cases 9. Conversations between Respondent and Complainant in depth 04/23 extended past 8 therapy related topics, were casual in nature, and therapeutic approaches for them.
8 8. Agency 1 is owned by Respondent’s husband (“Husband”) involved discussion topics such as food and business partner 9 (“Business Partner”)TV shows.
10 910. The complaint outlined various ways Complainant interpreted Respondent’s 11 actions and communications, and she felt there were undertones of flirtation and intimacy that 12 were out of the bounds of the therapist/client relationship.
13 11. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the following during her investigative interview:
11 a. Respondent worked with Agency 1 for a few months, but does not recall the 12 dates.
13 b. Her role was like that of a supervisor, interview and in that she handled scheduling, day to 14 day operations, and helped clients get what they neededher written response.
15 c. Respondent did not really have any clients, but received clinical supervision.
16 d. She worked as a support for other therapists and completed intake 17 assessments and treatment plans.
18 e. Respondent sent the clinical supervision notes as proof she was supervised 19 because it was alleged she did not have supervision.
20 10. Despite Respondent representing she did not have a case load of clients, she 21 was involved in the client’s clinical care.
22 11. Respondent initially represented she received clinical supervision at Agency 1, 23 supplying clinical supervision notes appearing to correspond with this employment, and later 24 represented she did not provide therapy services while working for Agency 1 during her 25 investigative interview.
1 12. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the following during her investigative interview:
2 a. Respondent did not really have a direct supervisor at Agency 1.
3 b. If she had questions, she would talk to Business Partner or Husband.
4 c. Respondent did not have a direct supervisor at Agency 2.
5 d. She no idea how much Complainant was receiving supervision from Supervisor, and she did not know that 6 direct and clinical supervision were different reading into things.
7 13. Respondent worked at multiple facilities, one which was owned by Husband, 8 without direct supervision as an associate level licensee.
9 14. Additionally, the clinical supervision contract Respondent and Supervisor utilized 10 did not outline the behavioral health agency the supervision would be for.
11 15. The contract was signed by Husband, as the CEO, Respondent, and Supervisor.18 19 20 21 22 24 25 …
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Consent Agreement
FINDINGS OF FACT. 14 1. Respondent is the holder of License No. LMSW-18502 LAC-16456 for the practice of social 15 work counseling in the State of Arizona.
16 2. Since 03/01/20From 03/23 – 05/23, Respondent provided behavioral health services to Client at 17 Agency.
18 3. On 03/24/23, Complainant 2 signed an informed consent which indicated Agency 19 does not provide letters to the courts or provide parenting recommendations to the courts.
20 4. Respondent only met with Client a total of three times and Respondent was 21 made aware during the 03/24/23 intake that the family court wanted Client to engage in therapy.
22 5. On 05/11/23, Complainant 2 requested that Respondent terminate services with 23 Client.
24 6. On 05/23/23, Complainant 1 informed Respondent that Agency would be 25 terminating her employment contract and would allow 30 days to transition clients.
1 7. On 05/23/23, following the termination of Client’s therapy services, Respondent 2 wrote a letter addressed to the family court judge directly with her name, LAC and Agency’s 3 name and address at the top which included the following:
4 a. Respondent was writing this letter out of concern for Client and concern for 5 herself and her livelihood, which Complainant 2 has derailed.
6 b. Respondent quoted Complainant 2’s email where he terminates services and 7 states it seems Complainant 2 wants to find the right fit for himself rather than 8 Client.
9 c. Respondent imagines it became clear to Complainant 2 that Respondent 10 intended to direct the course of treatment and resist manipulation and 11 intimidation.
12 d. Complainant 2 seemed resistant to acknowledging that adverse childhood 13 experiences must be addressed for Client to heal.
14 e. Complainant 2 does not seem to understand the degree to which his 15 behaviors may be delaying and sabotaging Client’s recovery.
16 f. Complainant 2 called her employer, Complainant 1, and Respondent’s 17 employment contract has been licensed as an LMSWcanceled.
18 g. Complainant 2 has been successful in waging a war against Mother through 19 the courts and Client is caught in the middle.
20 h. It is Respondent’s understanding that Complainant 2 has already lost one 21 daughter and his relationship with Client is now deteriorating.
22 i. Complainant 2 does not seem open to influence to effect positive change in 23 himself.
24 j. Respondent is terrified of Complainant 2’s position as a police officer.
1 k. Complainant 2 has shown himself to be vindictive and relying on his power to 2 further his agenda.
3 l. Complainant 2 has temporarily destroyed Respondent financially.
4 m. Respondent is pursuing her LPC or a position with a therapist so she can 5 accommodate a court order to work with Client.
6 8. Respondent writes this several page letter to be submitted to the courts outlining 7 her personal concerns with Complainant 2 and failed to consult with anyone prior to writing this 8 letter.
9 9. The informed consent Complainant 2 signed outlined that Agency does not write 10 letters to the courts, and a 06/02/22 group supervision Respondent attended included a 11 conversation around avoiding providing letters of recommendation that would put therapists into 12 an advocate role and create potential boundary violations.
13 10. Respondent extended her boundaries of competence by offering to be a safe 14 harbor therapist for Client yet acknowledged not knowing what a safe harbor therapist was.
15 11. Respondent did not obtain any sort of signed release of information authorizing 16 Respondent to speak directly to the judge or court, meaning Respondent provided personal 17 3health information of one of her clients to someone she did not have authorization to do so.
18 12. During On 05/26/23, Respondent was subsequently terminated effective immediately 19 from Agency for writing the 05/23/23.
20 13. On 05/25/23 following notification that her investigative interviewemployment contract would be 21 terminated within 30 days, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented she worked at 18 various clinics and group homes since obtaining her license.
19 4. This included at least six facilities, including two agencies (“Agency 1” and 20 “Agency wrote a letter addressed to Complainant 2”).
21 5. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the ’s Bureau 23 following in her written responsepart:
22 24 a. Contrary Respondent would like to bring attention that Complainant 2 has used the claim, she received supervision from a clinical supervisor 23 (“Supervisor”) while working for Agency 1.
24 6. Respondent subsequently provided a 03/21 Outside Supervisor contract and 25 clinical supervision notes ranging from 03/21 – 10/21collar of his position to threaten her.
1 7. Clinical supervision notes included b. Complainant 2 has essentially abused the following:
power of his position in a personal 2 a. A 03/04/21 note where supervisees share information about their agency, the matter that has resulted in Respondent losing her contracted position at 3 population, experience, and they processed a client.
4 b. A 04/12/21 individual supervision session note noting Respondent came 5 prepared and presented several cases with needed details.
6 c. A 10/21/21 individual supervision session note indicating they discussed 7 cases in depth and therapeutic approaches for them.
8 8. Agency 1 is owned by Respondent’s husband (“Husband”) and business partner 9 (“Business Partner”).
10 9. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the following during her investigative interview:
11 a. Respondent worked with Agency 1 for a few months, but does not recall the 12 dates.
13 b. Her role was like that of a supervisor, in that she handled scheduling, day to 14 day operations, and helped clients get what they needed.
15 c. Respondent did not really have any clients, but received clinical supervision.
16 d. She worked as a support for other therapists and completed intake 17 assessments and treatment plans.
18 e. Respondent sent the clinical supervision notes as proof she was supervised 19 because it was alleged she did not have supervision.
20 10. Despite Respondent representing she did not have a case load of clients, she 21 was involved in the client’s clinical care.
22 11. Respondent initially represented she received clinical supervision at Agency 1, 23 supplying clinical supervision notes appearing to correspond with this employment, and later 24 represented she did not provide therapy services while working for Agency 1 during her 25 investigative interview.
1 12. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the following during her investigative interview:
2 a. Respondent did not really have a direct supervisor at Agency 1.
3 b. If she had questions, she would talk to Business Partner or HusbandAgency.
4 c. Respondent did does not know the full extent of Complainant 2’s mental health 5 but, as an officer, at the least she imagines he has observed and dealt with 6 things on his job that could possibly have affected him in a direct supervisor at Agency way that he would 7 benefit from therapy for his mental well-being.
8 d. Respondent hopes Complainant 2 is getting the message she cares more 9 about “his daughter’s” mental health and the implications for the path her life 10 can take due to unresolved trauma than Respondent cares about how 11 intimidated he is or might be.
12 e. The fact is, Complainant 2 can create a world of trouble for Respondent, up 13 to and including her accidental death.
14 f. Respondent is preemptively bringing this to attention because she has no 15 idea how Complainant 2 will react to her letter to the Court and because of 16 the impact that his poor decisions are having on a number of people.
17 g. Respondent believes these are red flags and Complainant 2 is on shaky 18 ground, both personally and professionally.
19 h. Given Complainant 2’s action, he does not seem to truly want to ensure that 20 “his daughter” receives the competent and appropriate care she needs.
21 i. Respondent is not unemployed and Complainant 2 has completed a threat 22 that is going to severely impact her financial obligations, not to mention that 23 she loved and wanted that job.
24 j. This letter included Respondent’s signature on a letterhead for Agency.
1 14. Respondent extended her boundaries of competence by writing a letter to 2 Complainant 2’s colleague outlining her personal concerns with Complainant 2.
3 15. Following notice that her employment contract with Agency would be terminated, 4 Respondent writes a letter to Complainant’s employer using her credentials and Agency’s name 5 d. She was receiving supervision from Supervisor, and she did not know that 6 direct and clinical supervision were different thingsin the signature line.
7 136 16. Respondent worked at multiple facilities, one which was owned appears to exploit Client by Husband, referencing Client within this letter to the 7 bureau chief and even implies that Complainant 2 does not want to ensure Client receive 8 without direct supervision as an associate level licenseeappropriate care she needs.
9 1417. Additionally, This letter sent to the clinical supervision contract bureau chief appears retaliatory in nature since 10 Respondent and Supervisor utilized 10 did not outline only writes this letter after she is notified of the behavioral health agency the supervision would be forimpending termination from Agency.
11 15. The contract was signed by Husband, as the CEO, Respondent, and Supervisor.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Consent Agreement
FINDINGS OF FACT. 14 8 1. Respondent is the holder of License No. LMSW-18502 LAC-20502 for the practice of social 15 work 9 counseling in Arizona.. 10 Complaint No. 2023-0080
16 11 2. Since 03/01/20Prior to becoming licensed, Respondent has been licensed as an LMSW.
17 3. During her investigative interview, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented she worked at 18 various clinics and group homes since obtaining her license.
19 4. This included at least six facilities, including two agencies had a business (“Agency 1” ”), which 12 provided support groups services and 20 parenting classes.
13 3. In 12/21, in order to add therapy services to Agency 1, Respondent applied and 14 was approved for supervised private practice.
15 4. Respondent later separated her therapy practice from Agency 1 and created a 16 separate entity (“Agency 2”).
21 17 5. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the following in her written response:
22 a. Contrary From 02/22 – 06/22, Respondent provided therapy services to the claim, she received supervision from a clinical supervisor 23 client (“SupervisorMother”) while working for 18 at Agency 11 and continued to provide services through Agency 2 until 09/22.
24 19 6. Respondent subsequently provided a 03/21 Outside Supervisor contract Mother wanted to work on her struggles with her divorce and 25 clinical supervision notes ranging being separated 20 from 03/21 – 10/21her children in therapy.
1 21 7. Clinical supervision notes included During Mother’s treatment, Respondent testified on court at Mother’s and her 22 attorney’s request.
23 8. In 03/22, Respondent was empowered by the following:court to organize therapeutic 24 supervised time with Mother. 25 …
1 9. Respondent represented, during an investigative interview, that she advocated 2 a. A 03/04/21 note where supervisees share information about their agency, for her involvement at the beginning and the service was going to be both supervised parenting 3 population, experience, time and they processed a clienttherapy.
4 b. A 04/12/21 individual supervision session note noting 10. Due to not being able to coordinate therapeutic supervised visitation services, 5 Respondent came 5 prepared did not provide the service and presented several cases therapy services with needed detailsMother continued.
6 c. A 10/21/21 individual 11. In a 09/22 Minute Entry, it was agreed that Respondent would provide 7 supervision session note indicating they discussed 7 cases in depth and therapeutic approaches for themto Mother’s parenting time.
8 812. Mother’s last therapy session was on 09/20/22, and Mother was discharged from 9 therapy services at Agency 2 on 09/27/22 with the agreement that she could restart services at 10 any point.
11 13. On 09/24/22, a supervised parenting time visit through Agency 1 is owned by Respondent’s husband (“Husband”) and business partner 9 (“Business Partner”)took place.
10 912 14. From 09/22 – 12/22, supervised parenting time services continued and were 13 provided by both Respondent and other Agency 1 employees.
14 15. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the following during her investigative interview:
11 15 a. Respondent worked terminated services with Agency 1 for a few months, but does not recall the 12 datesMother because her treatment goals 16 were met.
13 17 b. Her role was like that of a supervisor, in that she handled scheduling, day to 14 day operations, and helped clients get what they needed.
15 c. Respondent did not really have any clients, but received clinical supervision.
16 d. She worked as a support for other therapists and completed intake 17 assessments and treatment plans.
feel it would be appropriate to continue therapy services 18 e. Respondent sent the clinical supervision notes as proof she because Mother was going to be receiving supervised parenting time 19 because it was alleged she did not have supervisionservices.
20 10. Despite c. Respondent representing she did not have decided it would be appropriate to provide this service to a case load 21 former therapy client due to her interpretations of clients, she 21 was involved in the clientBoard’s clinical carerules.
22 1116. Respondent initially shifted from a therapeutic provider role and into a role facilitating 23 parenting time for a former client. 24 … 25 …
1 17. Respondent represented she received clinical supervision at Agency 1, 23 supplying clinical supervision notes appearing previously believed it would have been appropriate 2 to correspond with this employment, and later 24 represented she did not provide have Mother return for therapy services while working for Agency 1 during her 25 investigative interviewbecause of their rapport and due to the belief it would 3 clinically benefit Mother.
1 124 18. While providing therapy services to Mother, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ wrote a 09/22 letter to 5 the court which outlined the following, in part:
6 a. Mother and her children would benefit from therapeutic sessions.
7 b. Mother would benefit from having a professionally trained parenting 8 supervisor and/or therapeutic visitation to use the skills learned in counseling.
9 c. A lack of consistency alienates mother.
10 d. Emotional distressed endured during visitation and a lack of professional 11 services undermines Mother.
12 19. Respondent went beyond providing factual information by including subjective 13 statements and recommendations.
14 20. Despite becoming aware that Mother’s treatment would involve a high conflict 15 family and being involved in court proceedings early on in treatment, Respondent represented 16 the following during regarding her investigative interviewexperience:
2 17 a. Respondent was a brand-new therapist and did not really know she was going to 18 be involved in a contentious case.
19 b. Respondent does not have any specialized training for working with high 20 conflict families or court cases.
21 21. A review of Respondent’s social media showed her Facebook page included 22 various posts relating to Agency 1 and contained website links for Agency 1 and Agency 2.
23 22. In a direct supervisor at 11/22 post, Respondent created a fundraiser for Agency 1 and asked for 24 donations to support a good cause.
1 23. In a 10/21 post, Respondent requested donations for Agency 1 for her birthday 2 because their mission means a lot to her.
3 24. Respondent utilized a platform that was accessible to her clientele to request 4 donations for Agency 1, publicly noting it was for a good cause, while having ownership of 5 Agency 1.
3 b. If she had questions6 25. Furthermore, she would talk to Business Partner or Husbanda review of Mother’s clinical record demonstrated various 7 documentation deficiencies.
4 c. Respondent did not have a direct supervisor at 8 26. Therapy consent forms for Agency 21 and Agency 2 were missing four required 9 elements.
5 d. She 10 27. Mother’s Agency 1 treatment plan was receiving supervision from Supervisor, and she did not know that 6 direct and clinical supervision were different things.
7 13. Respondent worked at multiple facilities, one which was owned by Husband, 8 without direct supervision as an associate level licensee.
9 14. Additionally, the clinical supervision contract Respondent and Supervisor utilized 10 did not outline the behavioral health agency the supervision would be formissing two required elements.
11 1528. The contract Mother’s Agency 2 treatment plan was signed by Husband, as the CEO, missing one required element.
12 29. Respondent, and Supervisor’s Agency 1 progress notes were missing one required element.
13 30. Some of Respondent’s releases of information for Agency 1 were missing two 14 required elements.
15 31. Some of Respondent’s releases of information for Agency 2 were missing one 16 required element.
Appears in 1 contract