Flowgates Sample Clauses

Flowgates. Only a subset of all transmission constraints that exist in either market will require coordinated congestion management. This subset of transmission constraints will be identified as Flowgates. For the purposes of the M2M coordination process (in addition to the studies described in Section 3 of this Schedule D) the following will be used in determining Flowgates. 2.1 NYISO and PJM will only be performing redispatch or NY-NJ PAR coordination on Flowgates that are under the operational control of NYISO or PJM. NYISO and PJM will not be performing redispatch or NY-NJ PAR coordination on Flowgates that are owned and controlled by third party entities. 2.2 The Parties will make reasonable efforts to lower their generator binding threshold to match the lower generator binding threshold utilized by the other Party. The generator and NY-NJ PAR binding thresholds (the shift factor thresholds used to identify the resource(s) available to relieve a transmission constraint), will not be set below 3%, except by mutual consent. This requirement is not an additional criterion for determination of Flowgates. 2.3 For the purpose of determining whether a monitored element Flowgate is eligible for redispatch or NY-NJ PAR coordination, a threshold for determining a significant GLDF or NY-NJ PARs PSF will take into account the number of monitored elements. Implementation of Flowgates will ordinarily occur through mutual agreement. 2.4 M2M Redispatch Flowgates and Other Coordinated Flowgates that are eligible for redispatch coordination are also eligible for coordinated operation of the NY-NJ PARs. Flowgates that are eligible for coordinated operation of the NY-NJ PARs are not necessarily also eligible for redispatch coordination. 2.5 The NYISO shall post a list of all of the Flowgates located in the New York Control Area (“NYCA”) on its web site. PJM shall post a list of all of the Flowgates located in its Control Area on its web site.
Flowgates. (a) Flowgate definitions including seasonal TFC, TRM, CBM, a & b multipliers; (b) Flowgates to be added on demand; (c) List of Coordinated Flowgates; (d) List of Flowgates to recognize when processing transmission service (if different than list of Coordinated Flowgates); and (e) Requirements under Section 5.1.7. Southwest Power Pool - Rate Schedules and Seams Agreements Tariff - MISO-SPP Joint Operating Agreement - Rate Schedule 9 Article IV - Rate Schedule 9 Section 4.1 - Rate Schedule 9 Section 4.1.4 - Rate Schedule 9 Section 4.1.4.2
Flowgates. Flowgates are facilities or groups of facilities that may act as significant constraint points on the system. As such, they are typically used to analyze or monitor the effects of power flows on the bulk transmission grid. Operating Entities utilize Flowgates in various capacities to coordinate operations and manage reliability. For the purpose of this process, there are three kinds of Flowgates: AFC Flowgates, which are defined in Appendix A, Coordinated Flowgates (CFs), which are defined below, and Reciprocal Coordinated Flowgates (RCFs), which are defined in “Reciprocal Operations” Section 6. A diagram illustrating how these three categories of Flowgates are determined is included as Appendix C.
Flowgates. (a) Flowgate definitions including seasonal TTC, TRM, CBM, and a & b multipliers; (b) Flowgates to be added on demand; (c) List of Coordinated and Reciprocal Coordinated Flowgates; (d) List of Flowgates to recognize when selling point-to-point service (if different than list of Coordinated Flowgates); and (e) Requirements under Section 5.1.7.
Flowgates. The Parties shall exchange the following information: (a) Flowgate definitions including seasonal TFC, TRM, CBM, and a & b multipliers; (b) Flowgates to be added on demand; (c) List of Coordinated Flowgates;
Flowgates. Flowgates are facilities or groups of facilities that may act as significant constraint points on the system. As such, they are typically used to analyze or monitor the effects of power flows on the bulk transmission grid. Operating Entities utilize Flowgates in various capacities to coordinate operations and manage reliability. For the purposes of this process, there are two kinds of Flowgates: Coordinated Flowgates, which are defined below, and Reciprocal Coordinated Flowgates, which are defined in Section 6. A diagram illustrating how these two categories of Flowgates are determined is included as Appendix G.

Related to Flowgates

  • Drainage Systems (1) Clear culvert inlets, outlets, and sediment catching basins. (2) Maintain waterbars, drainage dips, and other water diversion measures. (3) During active use, patrol and maintain functional drainage. (4) Repair damaged culvert ends.

  • Přetrvající platnost This Section 3 “

  • Dewatering (a) Where the whole of a site is so affected by surface water following a period of rain that all productive work is suspended by agreement of the Parties, then dewatering shall proceed as above with Employees so engaged being paid at penalty rates as is the case for safety rectification work. This work is typically performed by Employees engaged within CW1, CW2 or CW3 classifications. When other Employees are undertaking productive work in an area or areas not so affected then dewatering will only attract single time rates. (b) Where a part of a site is affected by surface water following a period of rain, thus rendering some areas unsafe for productive work, consistent with the Employer’s obligations under the OH&S Act, appropriate Employees shall assist in the tidying up of their own work site or area if it is so affected. Where required, appropriate Employees will be provided with the appropriate PPE. Such work to be paid at single time rates. Productive work will continue in areas not so affected. (c) To avoid any confusion any ‘dewatering’ time which prevents an Employee from being engaged in their normal productive work is not included in any calculation for the purposes of determining whether an Employee is entitled to go home due to wet weather (refer clauses 32.4 and 32.5)

  • Rubric The rubrics are a scoring tool used for the Educator’s self-assessment, the formative assessment, the formative evaluation and the summative evaluation. The districts may use either the rubrics provided by ESE or comparably rigorous and comprehensive rubrics developed or adopted by the district and reviewed by ESE.

  • Trunk Group Architecture and Traffic Routing 5.2.1 The Parties shall jointly establish Access Toll Connecting Trunks between CLEC and CBT by which they will jointly provide Tandem-transported Switched Exchange Access Services to Interexchange Carriers to enable such Interexchange Carriers to originate and terminate traffic from and to CLEC's Customers. 5.2.2 Access Toll Connecting Trunks shall be used solely for the transmission and routing of Exchange Access and non-translated Toll Free traffic (e.g., 800/888) to allow CLEC’s Customers to connect to or be connected to the interexchange trunks of any Interexchange Carrier that is connected to the CBT access Tandem. 5.2.3 The Access Toll Connecting Trunks shall be one-way or two-way trunks, as mutually agreed, connecting an End Office Switch that CLEC utilizes to provide Telephone Exchange Service and Switched Exchange Access Service in the given LATA to an access Tandem Switch CBT utilizes to provide Exchange Access in the LATA.