General Findings Sample Clauses
The "General Findings" clause serves to formally record the key facts, observations, or conclusions that have been determined during an investigation, audit, or assessment. Typically, this clause outlines the main results or discoveries relevant to the subject matter, such as compliance with regulations, identification of issues, or confirmation of certain conditions. By summarizing these findings in a clear and organized manner, the clause ensures that all parties have a shared understanding of the essential outcomes, thereby supporting transparency and informed decision-making.
General Findings. What findings can be drawn from these seven case studies? First, there seems to be no clear relationship between one aspect of ‘publicness’ and another. In other words, it cannot be said that a privately-owned public space is by definition less accessible, or a privately-managed space automatically more exclusive. In the Netherlands, Proefpark De Punt is a clear example of a space under fully private management that is, if anything, even more inclusive than many government- owned parks: What’s special about this is precisely that there is no gate, so yes, in the evening you get youths hanging around, and at night you get the Bulgarians drinking their whisky until the morning. Well, they are just as welcome as the good citizens. (Interview Proefpark De Punt) Second, there is a significant difference in governance culture between the British and the Dutch cases with regard to the relationship between public and private parties. As mentioned, many British site managers argue that local governments were happy to see new private developments as it represented an improvement of the particular site. In the Dutch cases, local government is often far more wary of handing over responsibilities to the private sector. This can be seen most clearly in the case of the ArenA Boulevard, where the only involvement of the private sector is a very loose and informal form of public-private cooperation. As a local government official put it: Downloaded by [Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen] at 04:33 19 November 2013 If you give them too much influence, that means that you cannot really weigh the common good anymore. Well, that is what you just shouldn’t do as a municipality At the end of the day it’s a case of he who pays the piper calls the tune in this country. You have to be reasonable and fair as a municipality, and that would be very hard to maintain It’s an illusion to say in this country private parties pay for it because they like you. That’s not going to happen. There is something in return. (Interview ArenA Boulevard) Consequently, responsibility for public space in the Dutch cases is still very much the responsibility of local government, and exceptions to that rule seem to be a much rarer than in the British context. This might explain why public spaces that are completely privately owned or managed are more difficult to find in the Netherlands than they are in Britain. Discussion: Reflecting on the OMAI Model By applying the model to seven case studies, the study has ...
General Findings. The most important conclusion was that there were considerable data gaps at various levels that needed to be filled in order to successfully characterize and quantify California’s foam insulation high GWP GHG banks and emissions and management options. The following sections provide an outline of our main findings by key areas of research.
General Findings. That the application for rezoning was initially filed with the City on , as required by City Ordinance.
General Findings. 20 A. That the application of VOLUSIA OAKS, LLC was duly and properly filed herein on 21 November 19, 2018 as required by law.
22 B. That all fees and costs which are by law, regulation, or Ordinance required to be 23 borne and paid by the applicant have been paid.
24 C. That the applicant is the CONTRACT PURCHASER of the 78.987+/- acres of 1 contiguous parcels of land which is situated in DeLand, Florida. These parcels of land are described 2 more particularly in the survey and legal description, a true copy of which is attached hereto as
4 D. That the Applicant has complied with the concept plan provision as required by Land 5 Development Regulations Ordinance No. 2013-11, as amended.
6 E. That the Applicant has complied with the "Due Public Notice" requirements of the 7 City Commission, Land Development Regulations Ordinance No. 2013-11, as amended.
8 F. That the owners of the properties, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 9 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ AND ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ agree 10 with the provisions of the Development Agreement.
General Findings. The sale and assignment of the Purchased Assets outside of a plan of 16 reorganization pursuant to the Purchase Agreement neither impermissibly restructures the rights of 17 the Debtor’s creditors nor impermissibly dictates the terms of a liquidating plan of reorganization 18 for the Debtors. The Sale does not constitute a sub ▇▇▇▇ chapter 11 plan. 19
General Findings. Chilcotin Study Area 28
General Findings. The Secretary finds, in accordance with SMCRA and 30 CFR 732.17, that the amendment submitted by New Mexico on February 8,1984, meets the requirements of SMCRA and the Federal regulations with one exception discussed below. Only those provisions of particular interest or concern are discussed in the specific findings which follow. Unless specifically stated, the Secretary approves the revisions to the New Mexico regulations. Discussion of only those provisions for which specific findings are made does not imply any deficiency in any provision not discussed. The provisions not specifically discussed are found to be consistent with the Act and no less effective than the Federal regulations. All of the provisions involved in the amendment are cited at the end of this notice in the amendatory language for
General Findings. Result of the research described three main points, there were finding, discussion and threat of research as an addition, in finding there were students ability in identifying adjective in descriptive text and the students difficulties in identifying adjective in descriptive text at grade VII SMP Negeri 3 Padangsidimpuan
General Findings. It was generally observed that the relevant property has not been constructed in compliance with Part B of the Building Regulations 1997 nor the granted Fire Safety Certificates, for various reasons including…
1. Inadequate and/or non-provision of compartmentation between apartments and common areas.
2. Inadequate and/or non-provision of compartmentation between apartments both horizontally and vertically.
3. Inadequate and/or non-provision of fire stopping at required location.
4. Inadequate and/or non-provision of fire rated door sets.
5. Inadequate protection of structural elements.
General Findings. It is clear that the findings during the workshop are not in line with the expectations created in the interviews. This can have two possible causes, one is the lack of openness and recognition of the problem during the workshop. On the other hand, the internal validity of the interviews may also have been biased by the possible 'snapshot character' of the interviews (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2009), although it is true that the study conducted in 2014 (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇) already mentioned staffing shortages and communication problems. In any case, it can be suggested that the extra pressure and fatigue after the Covid-19 pandemic slightly magnified opinions. Therefore, this study has shown that for a co-creative workshop on a given problem to be successful, a certain level of openness and trust in each other is needed in order to achieve a constructive outcome.