Global population size and trends Sample Clauses

Global population size and trends. The most recent information on population status and trends that has been made available to ACAP by the Parties was summarised for consideration by the joint Working Groups. It is important to note that these summaries reflect only data that have been submitted to the database. The rigour therefore of this information is reliant on timely and comprehensive provision of relevant information by all Parties. At present, there are 248 islands where populations of ACAP species breed. The 29 ACAP species that are listed currently comprise 2.95 million pairs each year, breeding at 141 “island groups” which in turn comprise 571 populations (excluding sites with single or mixed pairs). The rarest of the ACAP species remains the Critically Endangered Amsterdam Albatross (30 annually breeding pairs), and the most abundant is the Vulnerable White- chinned Petrel (c. 1 million annually breeding pairs). Determination of global trends is difficult because populations within a species may show different trajectories. Discussions preceding the meeting raised the option of applying the algorithms used by BirdLife International in their determination of IUCN status. The status of all ACAP species will be reviewed by BirdLife International in 2012. BirdLife wishes to work with ACAP to ensure that the most current and up-to-date population data are used in the re- assessments. Therefore, application of the BirdLife International criteria to assess global population trends should ensure that the information provided to the Fourth Meeting of Parties to the Agreement in 2012 shall be broadly consistent with the BirdLife assessments for the IUCN Red List later in the year. Population decline Restricted breeding range Limited population size Decline in habitat Endemic to single country Number of island groups Annual breeding pairs Breeding Frequency 1 Amsterdam Albatross * * * France 1 30 B 2 Tristan Albatross * * United Kingdom 1 1,698 B 3 Waved Albatross * * * Ecuador 2 9,615 A 4 Northern Royal Albatross * * * New Zealand 3 5,832 B 5 Black-footed Albatross 4 68,962 A 6 Sooty Albatross * 6 13,674 B 7 Atlantic Yellow-nosed Albatross * * United Kingdom 2 33,650 A 8 Indian Yellow-nosed Albatross * 4 39,320 A 9 Black-browed Albatross * 15 600,661 A 10 Antipodean Albatross * * New Zealand 3 8,273 B 11 Wandering Albatross * 5 8,214 B 12 Southern Royal albatross * New Zealand 2 7,886 B 13 Short-tailed Albatross * * * 2 472 A 14 Grey-headed Albatross * 8 94,603 B 15 Chatham Albatross * * ...
View Source

Related to Global population size and trends

  • Trunk Group Architecture and Traffic Routing 5.2.1 The Parties shall jointly establish Access Toll Connecting Trunks between CLEC and CBT by which they will jointly provide Tandem-transported Switched Exchange Access Services to Interexchange Carriers to enable such Interexchange Carriers to originate and terminate traffic from and to CLEC's Customers. 5.2.2 Access Toll Connecting Trunks shall be used solely for the transmission and routing of Exchange Access and non-translated Toll Free traffic (e.g., 800/888) to allow CLEC’s Customers to connect to or be connected to the interexchange trunks of any Interexchange Carrier that is connected to the CBT access Tandem. 5.2.3 The Access Toll Connecting Trunks shall be one-way or two-way trunks, as mutually agreed, connecting an End Office Switch that CLEC utilizes to provide Telephone Exchange Service and Switched Exchange Access Service in the given LATA to an access Tandem Switch CBT utilizes to provide Exchange Access in the LATA.

  • Infrastructure Vulnerability Scanning Supplier will scan its internal environments (e.g., servers, network devices, etc.) related to Deliverables monthly and external environments related to Deliverables weekly. Supplier will have a defined process to address any findings but will ensure that any high-risk vulnerabilities are addressed within 30 days.

  • Switching System Hierarchy and Trunking Requirements For purposes of routing ECI traffic to Verizon, the subtending arrangements between Verizon Tandem Switches and Verizon End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements Verizon maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic (i.e., traffic will be routed to the appropriate Verizon Tandem subtended by the terminating End Office serving the Verizon Customer). For purposes of routing Verizon traffic to ECI, the subtending arrangements between ECI Tandem Switches and ECI End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements that ECI maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic.

  • COVID-19 Vaccine Passports Pursuant to Texas Health and Safety Code, Section 161.0085(c), Contractor certifies that it does not require its customers to provide any documentation certifying the customer’s COVID-19 vaccination or post-transmission recovery on entry to, to gain access to, or to receive service from the Contractor’s business. Contractor acknowledges that such a vaccine or recovery requirement would make Contractor ineligible for a state-funded contract.

  • Study Population ‌ Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post enterostomy closure, following enterostomy closure (12-month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 month of overall study duration).