Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans Sample Clauses

Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans. EPA QA/G-5, EPA Publication No. EPA/240/R-021/009. Office of Environmental Information, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, December 2002. EPA. Guidance on Technical Audits and Related Assessments for Environmental Data Operations. EPA QA/G-7, EPA Publication No. EPA/600/R-99/080. Office of Environmental Information, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, January 2000.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans. USEPA. (EPA QA/G-5, EPA/240/R-02/009) December 2002. Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analysis of Pollutants; Whole Effluent Toxicity Test Methods. Final Rule. Federal Register/Vol. 67 69953. November 19, 2002. Compliance and Enforcement National Priority: Clean Water Act, Wet Weather, Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations. USEPA.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans. (QAM and/or PO may insert QA references that inform or assist the recipient here). • EPA’s Quality Program website has a list of QA managers, and Non-EPA Organizations Quality Specifications. • The Office of Grants and Debarment Implementation of Quality Assurance Requirements for Organizations Receiving EPA Financial Assistance.
View Source
Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans. EPA QA/G‐5. Available at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/sites/production/files/2015‐06/documents/g5‐final.pdf. EPA, 2017. Geospatial Resources at EPA. Available at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇/geospatial/epa‐ geospatial‐data (accessed Dec. 14, 2017). ▇▇▇▇▇‐▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, D., ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. 2008a. Ecological Performance Standards for Wetland Mitigation: An Approach Based on Ecological Integrity Assessments. Arlington, Virginia: NatureServe. ▇▇▇▇▇‐▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇. 2008b. Assessing the Condition of Lands Managed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers: Level 1 Ecological Integrity Assessment. Arlington, Virginia: NatureServe. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, M.S., A.D. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, and M.E. Kentula. 2004. Review of Rapid Methods for Assessing Wetland Condition. EPA/620/R‐04/009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. FGDC (Federal Geographic Data Committee), 2017. ISO Geospatial Metadata Standards. ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/metadata/iso‐standards. Accessed on Dec. 19, 2017. ▇▇▇▇▇, F.R., ▇.▇. ▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Jr. and ▇.▇. ▇▇▇▇▇. 2002. A Regional Guidebook for Applying the Hydrogeomorphic Approach to Assessing Wetland Functions of Riverine Floodplains in the Northern Rocky Mountains. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center. Environmental Laboratory, Vicksburg, Mississippi. ERDC/EL TR 02‐21. ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇. and ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. 2009. Vegetation Index of Biotic Integrity (VIBI) for Headwater Wetlands in the Southern Rocky Mountains: Version 2.0 Calibration of Selected VIBI Models. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Colorado.
View Source

Related to Guidance for Quality Assurance Project Plans

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Quality Assurance The parties endorse the underlying principles of the Company’s Quality Management System, which seeks to ensure that its services are provided in a manner which best conforms to the requirements of the contract with its customer. This requires the Company to establish and maintain, implement, train and continuously improve its procedures and processes, and the employees to follow the procedures, document their compliance and participate in the improvement process. In particular, this will require employees to regularly and reliably fill out documentation and checklists to signify that work has been carried out in accordance with the customer’s specific requirements. Where necessary, training will be provided in these activities.

  • Quality Assurance/Quality Control Contractor shall establish and maintain a quality assurance/quality control program which shall include procedures for continuous control of all construction and comprehensive inspection and testing of all items of Work, including any Work performed by Subcontractors, so as to ensure complete conformance to the Contract with respect to materials, workmanship, construction, finish, functional performance, and identification. The program established by Contractor shall comply with any quality assurance/quality control requirements incorporated in the Contract.

  • Quality Assurance Requirements There are no special Quality Assurance requirements under this Agreement.