Highway Projects Clause Samples

The "Highway Projects" clause defines the terms and conditions that apply specifically to construction, maintenance, or improvement projects involving highways. It typically outlines the scope of work, compliance with relevant government regulations, and any special requirements for working on public roadways, such as traffic management or safety protocols. This clause ensures that all parties understand their obligations and responsibilities when undertaking highway-related work, thereby promoting safety, regulatory compliance, and efficient project execution.
Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided in subpart 3.3.2 of this MOU or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary's responsibilities under subparts 3.1 and 3.2 of this MOU shall apply to the environmental review, consultation, or any other action pertaining to the environmental review or approval of the following classes of highway projects located within the State of Arizona. The definition of "highway project" is found at 23 C.F.R. 773.103, and for purposes of this MOU, "highway project" includes eligible preventative maintenance activities. ADOT shall conduct any reevaluation required by 23 C.F.R. 771.129 for projects for which construction is not completed prior to the date of this MOU in accordance with the provisions of this MOU. Prior to approving any CE determination, FONSl, final EIS, or final EIS/ROD, ADOT shall ensure and document that for any proposed project the design concept, scope, and funding are consistent with the current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), as applicable. A. All Class I, or EIS projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals. B. All Class II, or CE projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals, and that do not qualify for assignment of responsibilities pursuant to ADOT’s Section 326 MOU. C. All Class III, or EA projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals. D. Projects funded by other Federal agencies (or projects without any Federal funding) that also require FHWA approvals. For these projects, ADOT would not assume the NEPA responsibilities of other Federal agencies; however, ADOT may use or adopt another Federal agency’s NEPA analysis or documents consistent with 40 C.F.R. parts 1500-1508, current law, and USDOT and FHWA regulations, policies, and guidance. E. FHWA will retain responsibility for the South Mountain Freeway EIS until the notices of limitation of claims issued by FHWA pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 139(l) have expired. ADOT agrees to be responsible for any re-evaluations needed under 23 C.F.R. 771.129 or other environmental reviews needed for the South Mountain Freeway project thereafter. 3.3.2 The following are specifically excluded from the list in subpart 3.3.1 of highway projects: A. Any Federal Lands Highway projects authorized under 23 U.S.C. 202, 203, 204, and FAST Act Section 1123, unless such projects will be designed and constructed by ADOT. B. A...
View SourceView Similar (7)
Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided by subpart 3.3.2 below or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary’s responsibilities under subparts 3.1 and 3.2 above shall apply with respect to the environmental review, consultation, or other action pertaining to the review or approval of the following classes of highway projects located within the State of California. The definition of “highway project” is found at 23 CFR 773.103, and for purposes of this MOU, “highway project” includes eligible preventative maintenance activities. Prior to approving any CE determination under this MOU, FONSI, final EIS, or final EIS/ROD, the State of California shall ensure and document that for any proposed project the design concept, scope, and funding are consistent with the current Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). A. Projects requiring an EIS, both on the state highway system (SHS) and Local Assistance projects off the SHS that are funded by the FHWA or require FHWA approvals. B. Projects qualifying for CEs, both on the SHS and Local Assistance projects off the SHS that are funded by the FHWA or require FHWA approvals, and that do not qualify for assignment of responsibilities pursuant to the 326 CE MOU. C. Projects requiring EAs, both on the SHS and Local Assistance projects off the SHS that are funded by the FHWA or require FHWA approvals: D. Projects funded by other Federal agencies [or projects without any Federal funding] that also require FHWA approvals and meet the definition of a highway project found at 23 CFR 773.103. For these projects, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ would not assume the NEPA responsibilities of other Federal agencies. However, Caltrans may use or adopt other Federal agencies’ NEPA analyses consistent with 40 CFR parts 1500–1508, and USDOT and FHWA regulations, policies, and guidance. 3.3.2 The following are specifically excluded from the list in subpart 3.3.1 of highway projects and classes of highway projects: A. Any highway projects authorized under 23 U.S.C. 202, 203, and 204 unless such projects will be designed and constructed by Caltrans; B. Any project that crosses State boundaries and any project that crosses or is adjacent to international boundaries. For purposes of this agreement a project is considered “adjacent to international boundaries” if it requires the issuance of a new or the modification of an existing Presidential Permit by th...
View SourceView Similar (6)
Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided in subpart 3.3.2 of this MOU or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary's responsibilities under subparts 3.1 and 3.2 of this MOU shall apply to the environmental review, consultation, or any other action pertaining to the environmental review or approval of the following classes of highway projects located within the State of Alaska. The definition of "highway project" is found at 23 C.F.R. part 773.103, and for purposes of this MOU, "highway project" includes eligible preventative maintenance activities. The DOT&PF shall conduct any reevaluation required by 23 C.F.R. part 771.129 for projects for which construction is not completed prior to the date of the Original MOU, in accordance with the provisions of this MOU and the Original MOU. Prior to approving any CE determination, FONSI, final EIS, or final EIS/ROD, DOT&PF shall ensure and document that for any proposed project the design concept, scope, and funding are consistent with the current Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), as applicable. A. All Class I, or EIS projects that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals. B. All Class II, or CE projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals. C. All Class III, or EA projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals.
View Source
Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided in subpart 3.3.2 of this MOU or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary's responsibilities under subparts 3.1 and 3.2 of this MOU shall apply to the environmental review, consultation, or any other action pertaining to the environmental review or approval of the following classes of highway projects located within the State of Alaska. The definition of "highway project" is found at 23 C.F.R. part 773.103, and for purposes of this MOU, "highway project" includes eligible preventative maintenance activities. The DOT&PF shall conduct any reevaluation required by 23 C.F.R. part 771.129 for projects for which construction is not completed prior to the date of the Original MOU, in accordance with the provisions of this MOU and the Original MOU. Prior to approving any CE determination, FONSI, final EIS, or final EIS/ROD, DOT&PF shall ensure and document that for any proposed project the design concept, scope, and funding are consistent with the current Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), as applicable. A. All Class I, or EIS projects that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals. B. All Class II, or CE projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals. C. All Class III, or EA projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals. D. The DOT&PF will not assume the NEPA responsibilities of other Federal agencies. However, DOT&PF may use or adopt another Federal agency's NEPA analysis or documents consistent with 40 C.F.R. parts 1500-1508, current law, and USDOT and FHWA regulations, policies, and guidance. 3.3.2 The following are specifically excluded from the list in subpart 3.3.1 of highway projects: A. Any Federal Lands Highway projects authorized under 23 U.S.C. 202, 203, 204, and Section 1123 of the Fixing America's Surface Transportation Act (P.L. 114-94), unless such projects will be designed and constructed by DOT&PF. B. Any project that crosses or is adjacent to international boundaries. For purposes of this MOU, a project is considered "adjacent to international boundaries" if it requires the issuance of a new, or the modification of an existing, Presidential Permit by the U.S. Department of State. C. Projects under the Recreational Trails Program (23 U.S.C. 206). D. Denali Commission projects (fully administered by the Denali Commission, with no FHWA involvement after transfer o...
View Source
Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided by subpart 3.3.2 below or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary's responsibilities under subparts 3.1 and 3.2 above shall apply to the environmental review, consultation, or other action pertaining to the environmental review or approval of the following classes of highway projects located within the State of Texas. The definition of “highway project” is found at 23 CFR 773.103, and for purposes of this MOU, “highway project” includes eligible preventative maintenance activities. The State shall conduct any reevaluations required under 23 CFR 771.129 for projects for which construction is not completed prior to the date of this MOU, in accordance with the provisions of this MOU. Prior to approving any CE determination, FONSI, final EIS, or final EIS/ROD, the State shall ensure and document that for any proposed project the design concept, scope, and funding are consistent with the current Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP). A. Projects requiring an EIS, both on the state highway system (SHS) and local government projects off the SHS that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals. This assignment does not include the environmental review associated with the development and approval of the Draft EIS, Final EIS, and ROD for the following projects: 1. Trinity Parkway – This project is in the Dallas District with limits from IH 35E/SH 183 to US 175/SH 310. The project would include new location construction of a four (4) to six (6) lane tollway with a nine-mile encroachment into a USACE- regulated floodway of the Trinity River.
View Source
Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided by subpart 3.3.2 below or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary's and FHWA’s responsibilities under subparts 3.1 and
View Source
Highway Projects. Execute the enclosed documents as provided by Article 1306 of the specifications.
View Source
Highway Projects. 3.3.1 Except as provided in subpart 3.3.2 of this MOU or otherwise specified in this subpart, the assignments and assumptions of the USDOT Secretary's responsibilities under subparts 3.1 and 3.2 of this MOU shall apply to the environmental review, consultation, or any other action pertaining to the environmental review or approval of the following classes of highway projects located within the State of Arizona. The definition of "highway project" is found at 23 CFR 773.103, and for purposes of this MOU, "highway project" includes eligible preventative maintenance activities. ADOT shall conduct any reevaluation required by 23 CFR 771.129 for projects for which construction is not completed prior to the date of this MOU in accordance with the provisions of this MOU. Prior to approving any CE determination, FONSl, final EIS, or final EIS/ROD, ADOT shall ensure and document that for any proposed project the design concept, scope, and funding are consistent with the current Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), or Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP), as applicable. All Class I, or EIS projects, that are funded by FHWA or require FHWA approvals, with the exception of the following projects: a. South Mountain Freeway b. Interstate 11 (I-11) Corridor Tier 1 EIS, Nogales to Wickenburg c. Sonoran Corridor Tier 1 Environmental Impact Statement
View Source

Related to Highway Projects

  • Projects There shall be a thirty (30) km free zone around the projects excluding the Metro Vancouver Area. For local residents, kilometers shall be paid from the boundary of the free zone around the project. Workers employed by any contractor within an identified free zone who resides outside of that same free zone will be paid according to the Kilometer Chart from the project to their residence less thirty

  • FALSE STATEMENTS CONCERNING HIGHWAY PROJECTS T h i s p r o v i s i o n i s applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related subcontracts. In order to assure high quality and durable construction in conformity with approved plans and specifications and a high degree of reliability on statements and representations made by engineers, contractors, suppliers, and workers on Federal- aid highway projects, it is essential that all persons concerned with the project perform their functions as carefully, thoroughly, and honestly as possible. Willful falsification, distortion, or misrepresentation with respect to any facts related to the project is a violation of Federal law. To prevent any misunderstanding regarding the seriousness of these and similar acts, Form FHWA-1022 shall be posted on each Federal-aid highway project (23 CFR 635) in one or more places where it is readily available to all persons concerned with the project: 18 U.S.C. 1020 reads as follows: "Whoever, being an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, or of any State or Territory, or whoever, whether a person, association, firm, or corporation, knowingly makes any false statement, false representation, or false report as to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of the material used or to be used, or the quantity or quality of the work performed or to be performed, or the cost thereof in connection with the submission of plans, maps, specifications, contracts, or costs of construction on any highway or related project submitted for approval to the Secretary of Transportation; or Whoever knowingly makes any false statement, false representation, false report or false claim with respect to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of any work performed or to be performed, or materials furnished or to be furnished, in connection with the construction of any highway or related project approved by the Secretary of Transportation; or Whoever knowingly makes any false statement or false representation as to material fact in any statement, certificate, or report submitted pursuant to provisions of the Federal-aid Roads Act approved July 1, 1916, (39 Stat. 355), as amended and supplemented; Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both."

  • Capital Projects (a) The selection of all design professionals and contractors for capital projects shall be made by Lessor and Lessor shall provide at its expense all materials and services for capital projects. (b) Lessee shall cooperate with Lessor with respect to capital projects. Notwithstanding anything in the foregoing which may be construed to the contrary, Lessee shall have no obligation to perform any such capital projects unless Lessee agrees to perform and be responsible for same in accordance with a written agreement therefor between Lessor and Lessee.

  • Information Systems Acquisition Development and Maintenance a. Client Data – Client Data will only be used by State Street for the purposes specified in this Agreement.

  • Foreign-Owned Companies in Connection with Critical Infrastructure If Texas Government Code, Section 2274.0102(a)(1) (eff. Sept. 1, 2023, Section 2275.0102(a)(1), pursuant to House Bill 4595, Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S.) (relating to prohibition on contracts with certain foreign-owned companies in connection with critical infrastructure) is applicable to this Contract, pursuant to Government Code Section 2274.0102 (eff. Sept. 1, 2023, Section 2275.0102, pursuant to House Bill 4595, Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S.), Contractor certifies that neither it nor its parent company, nor any affiliate of Contractor or its parent company, is: (1) majority owned or controlled by citizens or governmental entities of China, Iran, North Korea, Russia, or any other country designated by the Governor under Government Code Section 2274.0103 (eff. Sept. 1, 2023, Section 2275.0103, pursuant to House Bill 4595, Acts 2023, 88th Leg., R.S.), or (2) headquartered in any of those countries.