Common use of Horizontal adjustment Clause in Contracts

Horizontal adjustment. 2.3.2.1. Horizontal adjustment of passing-beam headlamp designed to provide asymmetric “cut-off” line The applicant shall specify one of the following horizontal aim methods: (a) The "0.2°D line" method (see Figure A6-III). A single horizontal line at 0.2°D shall be scanned from 5° left to 5° right after the lamp has been aimed vertically. The maximum gradient "G" determined using the formula G = (log Eβ - log E(β + 0.1°)) where β is the horizontal position in degrees, shall not be less than 0.08. The inflection point found on the 0.2°D line shall be positioned on the line A. Figure A6-III Instrumental vertical and horizontal adjustment for asymmetric “cut-off” line- horizontal line scan method Note: The scales are different for vertical and horizontal lines. (b) The "3 line" method (see Figure A5-IV) Three vertical lines shall be scanned from 2°D to 2°U at 1°R, 2°R, and 3°R after the lamp has been aimed vertically. The respective maximum gradients "G" determined using the formula: G = (log Eβ – log E(β + 0.1°))

Appears in 2 contracts

Sources: Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Harmonized Technical United Nations Regulations for Wheeled Vehicles, Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Harmonized Technical United Nations Regulations for Wheeled Vehicles

Horizontal adjustment. 2.3.2.1. Horizontal adjustment of passing-beam headlamp designed to provide asymmetric “cut-off” line The applicant shall specify one of the following horizontal aim methods: (a) The "0.2°D line" method (see Figure A6-III). A single horizontal line at 0.2°D shall be scanned from 5° left to 5° right after the lamp has been aimed vertically. The maximum gradient "G" determined using the formula G = (log Eβ - log E(β + 0.1°)) where β is the horizontal position in degrees, shall not be less than 0.08. The inflection point found on the 0.2°D line shall be positioned on the line A. Figure A6-III Instrumental vertical and horizontal adjustment for asymmetric “cut-off” line- horizontal line scan method Note: The scales are different for vertical and horizontal lines. (b) The "3 line" method (see Figure A5-IV) Three vertical lines shall be scanned from 2°D to 2°U at 1°R, 2°R, and 3°R after the lamp has been aimed vertically. The respective maximum gradients "G" determined using the formula: G = (log Eβ – log E(β + 0.1°))

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Harmonized Technical United Nations Regulations for Wheeled Vehicles

Horizontal adjustment. 2.3.2.1. Horizontal adjustment of passing-beam headlamp designed to provide asymmetric “cut-off” line The applicant shall specify one of the following horizontal aim methods: (a) The "0.2°0.2 D line" method (see Figure A6-III2 below). A single horizontal line at 0.2°° D shall be scanned from 5° left to 5° right after the lamp has been aimed vertically. The maximum gradient "G" determined using the formula G = (log Eβ - log E(β + 0.1°)) where β is the horizontal position in degrees, shall not be less than 0.08. The inflection point found on the 0.2°0.2 D line shall be positioned on the line A. Figure A6-III E/ECE/324/Rev.2/Add.111/Rev.4 E/ECE/TRANS/505/Rev.2/Add.111/Rev.4 Annex 9 Instrumental vertical and horizontal adjustment for asymmetric “cut-off” line- - horizontal line scan method Note: The scales are different for vertical and horizontal lines. (b) The "3 line" method (see Figure A5-IV3) Three vertical lines shall be scanned from 2°° D to 2°° U at 1°R, 2°R, and 3°R after the lamp has been aimed vertically. The respective maximum gradients "G" determined using the formula: G = (log Eβ – log E(β + 0.1°))

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Agreement Concerning the Adoption of Harmonized Technical United Nations Regulations for Wheeled Vehicles