Intention to contract Clause Samples

The 'Intention to contract' clause establishes that the parties involved genuinely intend to create a legally binding agreement. In practice, this clause clarifies that the discussions, negotiations, or documents exchanged between the parties are not merely informal or for reference, but are meant to result in enforceable obligations. By including this provision, the clause helps prevent disputes over whether a contract was actually formed, ensuring that both parties are clear about their commitment and the legal consequences of their agreement.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 4 times
Intention to contract. In order for a contract to be legal, the parties must have intended to create a legally binding relationship. A court will not, for example, enforce a casual agreement between two people who agree to go shopping at 3PM because there was no intention to have a legally binding contract. However, where the parties are entering into a business
View Source
Intention to contract. An agreement is enforceable only when the parties intend to create a legally binding relationship. Not all agreements are made with this intention, so a court would need to consider the nature of the relationship between the parties and any evidence about the formation of the agreement in order to determine if the parties did intend to contract with one another. The general rule in law is that where there is a sufficiently close relationship between the parties, such as between family members, spouses or close friends, there is a presumption that the parties do not intend for their promises to be legally binding agreements. This presumption can, however, be rebutted if one of the parties wants to show that despite the close nature of the relationship, they intended to create a legally binding contract. In determining whether there was an intention to create a legal contract, a court will consider several factors, such as whether the agreement was written, if lawyers were involved in drafting the agreement, whether one party relied on the presumption of a contract to their detriment, and what the actual nature of the relationship is as opposed to its formal title, among others. For example, in the English case of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (1970),2 Mr. and ▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ signed a written agreement upon separation stating that if ▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ continued to pay the mortgage on their home, that once the mortgage was paid in full ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ would transfer the property to her. When that time came, ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ refused to transfer the title and argued that he had no intention to create a legally binding contract with his former wife. The court ruled that there was in fact a contract and ordered ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to transfer the deed for the home to ▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇. Despite the family relationship, ▇▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ was able to provide evidence that the parties intended to contract and therefore the presumption was rebutted. Conversely, parties entering into contracts in business settings are presumed to intend for their bargains to be legally binding contracts. Once again, this presumption can be rebutted if the party wanting to disprove the contract shows evidence that despite the nature of the relationship, there was no intention to create a legally binding relationship. For example, if the person could show that there was a clause in the contract indicating that “this is not a formal legal agreement”, the court may consider the presumption to have been rebutted.
View Source

Related to Intention to contract

  • Condition to Contract As a condition to this Agreement, Contractor shall execute the “Chapter 12B Declaration: Nondiscrimination in Contracts and Benefits” form (form HRC-12B-101) with supporting documentation and secure the approval of the form by the San Francisco Human Rights Commission.

  • Freedom to Contract The Executive represents that he is free to enter into this Agreement and carry out his obligations hereunder without any conflict with any prior agreements, and that he has not made and will not make any agreement in conflict with this Agreement.

  • Parties to Contract Any contract of the character described in Sections 4.1 and 4.2 of this Article IV or in Article VII hereof may be entered into with any Person, although one or more of the Trustees, officers or employees of the Trust may be an officer, director, trustee, shareholder, or member of such other party to the contract, and no such contract shall be invalidated or rendered voidable by reason of the existence of any such relationship, nor shall any Person holding such relationship be liable merely by reason of such relationship for any loss or expense to the Trust under or by reason of said contract or accountable for any profit realized directly or indirectly therefrom, provided that the contract when entered into was reasonable and fair and not inconsistent with the provisions of this Article IV or the By-Laws. The same Person may be the other party to contracts entered into pursuant to Sections 4.1 and 4.2 above or Article VII, and any individual may be financially interested or otherwise affiliated with Persons who are parties to any or all of the contracts mentioned in this Section 4.3.

  • Authority to Contract Each Party represents and warrants that it has full right, power and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Agreement, and that the person signing this Agreement is duly authorized to enter into this Agreement on its behalf.

  • Amendment to Contract Either party may request modification of the provisions of this Agreement by filing a Change Request with the Division. The Change Request must be submitted using the DOS Grants System at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. Changes that are agreed upon shall be valid only when amended in writing, signed by each of the parties and attached to the original of this Agreement. If changes are implemented without the Division’s written approval, the organization is subject to noncompliance, the grant award is subject to partial or complete refund to the State of Florida and this agreement is subject to termination.