Internal Logic Sample Clauses

The Internal Logic clause defines the underlying reasoning or set of rules that govern how a contract or agreement is interpreted and applied. In practice, this clause may specify the order in which provisions are read, how conflicts between terms are resolved, or the principles used to interpret ambiguous language. Its core function is to ensure consistency and predictability in the application of the contract, reducing the risk of disputes arising from differing interpretations.
Internal Logic. The component design is based on the following Apache Camel add-ons: • camel-core, providing the Control Bus enterprise integration pattern for logging and monitoring the operation of the ESB; • jBPM libraries for monitoring of the business process; • custom modules for integration and UI functionalities.
View Source
Internal Logic. The component design is based on the following Apache Camel add-ons: • custom modules for accessing the short-term store through a web API; • camel-jdbc, for accessing management databases (through JDBC); • camel-hdfs2, providing the functionalities for reading and writing messages from/to the bulk-store (HDFS file systems). The main modules of the component are presented in Table 8, below. Module Name Description Message Database Connector Manages connections to the short-term store, which keeps all the messages currently processed by the middleware. Messages contain both data and context information (related to routing). Management Database Connector Manages connections to the data store for meta-information. Bulk-Storage Connector Manages connections to the database that keeps records of all events taking place and acts as the long-term storage for all messages.
View Source
Internal Logic. The following table provides a brief description of the main modules of the ExtAdapter component. Module Name Description Mediator Responsible for providing a web interface for receiving data from external systems (push), as well as invoking services for accessing data (pull) upon trigger. CimTransform This module can transform data from external systems to CIM format, using a predefined mapping of ontologies and attributes. Messaging Client Undertakes the role of the JMS client for exchanging messages with the Middleware. Scheduler This module triggers the process of accessing data from external systems (in pull mechanism). Data Manager Responsible for communicating with a local database and storing the message queue.
View Source
Internal Logic. The internal logic of the application is based on the following concepts:
View Source
Internal Logic. The design of BPE follows a modular approach, utilizing the following artefacts: • jBPM libraries, as a business process engine; • camel-jbpm (Camel add-on), providing integration with jBPM; • custom modules, enabling interaction among them and with the Middleware. In Figure 12 a structure of the BPE is illustrated, adapted from [13], depicting its main modules and their interrelations. Process Model Service Call Call Result Process Result startProcess The following table provides a brief description of the main modules of the BPE component. Module Name Description Core Engine This module is responsible for handling the steps of the business process. It is deployed as a service and can be integrated through Java API or CDI services, as well remotely through a REST and JMS API. Business Activity Monitoring Keeps track of the business processes and provides monitoring information of the status of the business process. Process Manager Handles events (both internal and external), either by invoking business processes in the Core Engine or by invoking services in the Middleware and providing the result to the Core Engine. Model Manager Provides an interface for storing the process models in the model repository. Model Repository Responsible for storing the models (in XML format) of business processes and the history of business processes’ invocation.
View Source
Internal Logic. The component design is based on the following artefacts: • camel-core – the basic module of apache camel. • camel-jms / activemq-camel (or other mq library supporting JMS) as JMS component. Table 4 presents the main modules of the component. MOM This module provides a rule-based routing and mediation engine offering the core functionalities of the Middleware. Message Broker A building block of the Middleware is the message transfer agent (message broker). It acts as the connection of the Middleware with the external world and provides a solid implementation of messaging interface. Adapter This module is responsible for communicating with the back-end and transforming data from a certain format to the canonical format. The adapter can also handle an activity flow related to security (e.g. authentication, decryption, verify or sign document) and handle error cases.
View Source

Related to Internal Logic

  • INTERNAL MAIL The Association shall have access to the district mail service and school mail boxes, free of charge, for communication to bargaining unit members. Bulk material may have to be paid for by the Association.

  • Internal Investigations (A) The parties recognize that Florida Highway Patrol personnel occupy a special place in American society. Therefore, it is understood that the state has the right to expect that a professional standard of conduct be adhered to by all Florida Highway Patrol personnel regardless of rank or assignment. Since internal investigations may be undertaken to inquire into complaints of Florida Highway Patrol misconduct, the state reserves the right to conduct such investigations to uncover the facts in each case, but expressly agrees to carefully guard and protect the rights and dignity of accused personnel. In the course of an internal investigation, the investigative methods employed will be consistent with the law (including but not limited to section 112.532, F.S.) and this agreement; nothing in this agreement, however, shall be deemed to diminish the rights of employees under applicable law. (B) When an allegation is made against an employee, the state will make every reasonable effort to ensure that the allegation and any related statements are reduced to writing, under oath, and signed. The written allegation shall be known as a complaint. (C) When an employee is to be questioned or interviewed concerning a complaint or allegation, the employee will be informed prior to the interview of the nature of the investigation and whether he is the subject of the investigation or a witness in an investigation. Employees shall be informed of the right to have a union representative in attendance at the interview and where requested, an employee shall be given 48 hours to contact, consult with, and secure the attendance of a representative at the interview. If he is the subject of the investigation, the employee and his representative will also be informed of each complaint or allegation against him and they shall be permitted to review all written statements and recordings made by the complainant and witnesses at least two hours prior to the commencement of the interview in accordance with section 112, F.S. In the event the written statement or recordings are such that additional review time is warranted, the employee may request, and be granted, additional time unless the request is made for the purposes of delay. Pursuant to section 112.533, F.S., the employee who is the subject of the investigation shall not disclose the contents to anyone other than his representative or attorney until the investigation is complete. (D) Interviews and questioning of employees shall be conducted in a professional manner. Statements from an employee shall not be taken in a coercive manner. (E) The formal interrogation of an employee shall comply with the provisions of section 112.532, F.S. The employee shall receive a copy of his written or recorded statement at no cost to the employee. No recording or transcription of the investigative interview will be made without the knowledge of all participants present at the interview. (F) In cases where the agency determines that the employee’s absence from the work location is essential to the investigation and the employee cannot be reassigned to other duties pending completion of the investigation, the employee shall be placed on administrative leave with pay. Such leave shall be in accordance with Chapter 60L-34, F.A.C. (G) Unless required by statute, no employee shall be required to submit to a polygraph test or any device designed to measure the truthfulness of his responses during an investigation of a complaint or allegation. (H) Only sustained findings may be inserted in personnel records. Unfounded findings shall not be inserted in permanent personnel records or referred to in performance reviews. (I) Internal investigations will ordinarily be completed within 45 days from the date the complaint is filed, unless circumstances necessitate a longer period. An investigation shall not exceed 120 days without the approval of the Agency Head or designee. Except in the case of a criminal investigation, the employee shall be notified in writing of any investigation that exceeds 120 days. (J) The employee under investigation shall be advised in writing of the results of the investigation at its conclusion. (K) The state will make a good faith effort to train persons who investigate charges against employees in the investigative rights reserved for those employees in the interest of avoiding infringement of those rights. (L) In the case of criminal, non-administrative internal investigation into the criminal misconduct of a sworn employee, the provisions of (B) through (K) shall not apply.

  • Internal Use You will use the Services for Your own internal business, non-residential and non-personal use. You acknowledge and agree that You will not allow any third party, including Your vendors and service providers, to access or use the Services unless such third party is allowed access for the purpose of providing authorized customer support services or in connection with Your appropriate use of the Services for Your own business purposes.

  • S▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇; Internal Accounting Controls The Company and the Subsidiaries are in compliance with any and all applicable requirements of the S▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇ Act of 2002 that are effective as of the date hereof, and any and all applicable rules and regulations promulgated by the Commission thereunder that are effective as of the date hereof and as of the Closing Date. The Company and the Subsidiaries maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient to provide reasonable assurance that: (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorizations, (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP and to maintain asset accountability, (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization, and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences. The Company and the Subsidiaries have established disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and the Subsidiaries and designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. The Company’s certifying officers have evaluated the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures of the Company and the Subsidiaries as of the end of the period covered by the most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act (such date, the “Evaluation Date”). The Company presented in its most recently filed periodic report under the Exchange Act the conclusions of the certifying officers about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on their evaluations as of the Evaluation Date. Since the Evaluation Date, there have been no changes in the internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in the Exchange Act) of the Company and its Subsidiaries that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the internal control over financial reporting of the Company and its Subsidiaries.

  • Internal Accounting Controls The Company and each of its Subsidiaries maintain a system of internal accounting controls sufficient, in the judgment of the Company’s board of directors, to provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are executed in accordance with management’s general or specific authorizations, (ii) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and to maintain asset accountability, (iii) access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management’s general or specific authorization and (iv) the recorded accountability for assets is compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action is taken with respect to any differences.