Investigation and Enforcement Sample Clauses

Investigation and Enforcement. 3.1 EC and EP will conduct investigations into alleged contraventions of their respective legislation. 3.2 The parties will conduct a joint investigation for alleged contraventions of both federal and provincial legislation. 3.2.1 EP shall be the lead party in joint investigations unless otherwise agreed upon by the parties. 3.2.2 The Parties will confer upon undertaking an investigation and agree on the roles of the lead party and the support party in the investigation. 3.2.3 The Parties agree to exchange all relevant information obtained during an investigation. 3.2.4 The Parties will discuss the appropriate enforcement response at the conclusion of the investigation. 3.2.5 Each party will attempt to coordinate enforcement responses but each party reserves the right to proceed unilaterally with its own enforcement action. 3.2.6 Each party has the right to set and follow its own enforcement policy. 3.2.7 The Parties agree to share evidence, staff, expertise, witnesses and analysts for the purpose of preparing for and conducting trials. 3.2.8 The parties recognize that both federal and provincial Attorneys General retain their discretion to prosecute violations of their respective legislation.

Investigation and Enforcement. 1) The Participants have decided, subject to applicable laws and regulations, to provide mutual co-operation and assistance in any investigation or enforcement proceedings of any alleged or suspected violation of any laws or regulations under the scope of this Technical Arrangement. In addition, each Participant will notify the other promptly of any investigations when mutual interests are involved. 2) The Participants retain the right to take enforcement action within their jurisdiction. However, in some cases, a Participant may choose to review a remedial action taken by the other Participant. The enforcement consultation process under this Technical Arrangement will be subject to a regular joint review. 3) Where it is not otherwise inappropriate to do so, the Participants may jointly investigate any serious airworthiness issues, including major defects and related incidents and accidents for matters within the scope of this Technical Arrangement, by mutual consent, and with reasonable prior notice.

Investigation and Enforcement. CILEx Regulation and ACCA recognise that there are areas in which they have complementary functions and powers. They will therefore endeavour to ensure that in these cases, the most appropriate regulator will commence and lead investigations. To the extent permitted by law and having regard to their respective powers, expertise and resources, they will seek to ensure that in cases of investigations, CILEx Regulation and ACCA will notify each other of significant developments where the other is likely to have an interest, upon receipt of any request to do so from the other party.

Investigation and Enforcement. LTISD-PD shall have the primary responsibility with regard to investigation and enforcement of the laws and city ordinances pertaining to incidents which occur on LTISD-owned property or within the jurisdiction of LTISD where LTISD has an interest (e.g. campuses, school buses, off-campus student events/activities, follow-up investigations involving staff or students, leased property, etc.), unless LTISD determines that the best interests of the district and the public would be to defer such investigation and enforcement to LPD. In all other circumstances, LPD shall have the primary responsibility with regard to investigation and enforcement of the laws and all city ordinances within the city limits of Lakeway. It is understood by both LTISD and the City that serious incidents, occurring on LTISD property or within the jurisdiction of LTISD where LTISD has an interest, such as homicides, death investigations, sexual assaults, and incidents which require the deployment of additional law enforcement resources, will be the primary responsibility of LPD.

Investigation and Enforcement. The Authorities recognise that there are areas in which they have complementary functions and powers. To the extent permitted by law and having regard to their respective powers, expertise and resources, they will seek to ensure that in cases of investigations, the Authorities may notify each other of significant developments where the other is likely to have an interest. Where appropriate, the Authorities may discuss the steps they propose to take and ensure co-ordination takes place in a timely manner, where possible, allowing for a proper exchange of views.

Investigation and Enforcement. 4.1 The FSA and the Pensions Regulator recognise that there are areas in which they have complementary functions and powers. They will therefore endeavour to ensure that the most appropriate body or bodies will commence and lead investigations. To the extent permitted by law: (a) neither the Pensions Regulator nor the FSA will begin an investigation or enforcement action without informing the other if it has previously agreed that the other should be the sole investigator or enforcer; (b) in cases of parallel investigations, the FSA and the Pensions Regulator will notify each other of significant developments and discuss in advance the steps they propose to take.

Investigation and Enforcement. 8.1 The Participants recognise that there are areas in which they have complementary functions and powers. They will therefore endeavour to ensure that in these cases, the most appropriate body or bodies will commence and lead investigations. To the extent permitted by law and having regard to their respective powers, expertise, and resources, they will seek to ensure that in cases of investigations, the Participants will notify each other of significant developments where the other is likely to have an interest. Where appropriate, the Participants will discuss the steps they propose INFORMATION COMMISSIONER lntormat onCommssioner•o� � JJERSOEY OFFICIE OCFTHE to take and ensure co-ordination takes place in a timely manner, where possible, allowing for a proper exchange of views. 8.2 The Participants may refer a matter for action if the other body is considered more appropriate to deal with the matter. Any such referral will include the action sought and the legal powers it considers are available to the other. Where the other Participant determines not to proceed, an explanation will be provided, where possible. 8.3 Where the Participants agree that an investigation should be carried out by both of them, it will usually be appropriate that both investigations proceed in parallel. However, in appropriate circumstances, they will consider whether the particular facts of the matter, as they are known at that time, suggest that one Participant's investigation should proceed before the others. 8.4 Where information exchanged between the JDPA/Jersey Information Commissioner and the UK Commissioner indicates that the subject of the information is of interest to both Participants (for example where regulatory breaches under both sets of regulatory laws are suspected) a case conference may be called to ensure that the maximum, and appropriate, use of the information is made. In relevant cases, the JDPA/Jersey Information Commissioner may seek the involvement of a representative of Jersey's prosecuting authority - Her Majesty's Attorney Generali- in the case conference. 8.5 Where either Participant carries out any subsequent investigation and proceedings alone, that Participant will keep the other regularly updated on material aspects of the progress of the investigation. 8.6 If a decision is made by either Participant to take action against a subject, the JDPA/Jersey Information Commissioner and the UK Commissioner should consider whether it is possible and would b...

Investigation and Enforcement. Code Siren may investigate any suspected violation of this Policy and remove or restrict access to any content or resource that violates this Policy. You agree to cooperate with us to remedy any alleged breach. Whether there has been a violation of this Policy will be determined at Code Siren’s sole discretion.

Investigation and Enforcement. 6.1 The FCA and ▇▇▇ recognise that there are areas in which they have complementary functions and powers. They will therefore endeavour to ensure that in these cases, the most appropriate body or bodies will commence and lead investigations. To the extent permitted by law and having regard to their respective powers, expertise and resources, they will seek to ensure that: in cases of investigations, the FCA and ASA will notify each other of significant developments where the other is likely to have an interest and discuss where appropriate the steps they propose to take and co-ordination takes place in a timely manner, where possible, allowing for a proper exchange of views. 6.2 The FCA and ASA may refer a matter for action if the other body is considered more appropriate to deal with the matter. Any such referral will include the action sought and the legal powers it considers are available to the other. Where the other recipient determines not to proceed, an explanation will be provided, where possible. 6.3 Relevant FCA and ASA staff will, where appropriate, seek to maintain general awareness and understanding of each other’s functions and needs and will liaise with each other to ensure that issues are appropriately identified.