ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION. There is no doubt that the Appellant s father had several insurance policies with [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] , that the Appellant as heir of her parents could be entitled to the proceeds of these policies and that all family members were Holocaust victims. Therefore, the claim of the Appellant in general is within the scope of the Agreement. But, as far as the policies [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] are concerned, the Respondent has succeeded in establishing a valid defence in accordance with the Agreement. According to Section 17.3 Appeal Guidelines the claimant is not entitled to payment from the Foundation funds if;
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Appeals Panel Agreement
ISSUES FOR DETERMINATION. There is is, after the facts given above, no doubt that the Appellant s father had several insurance policies with [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] ], that the Appellant as heir of her his parents could be entitled to the proceeds of these policies and that all family members were Holocaust victims. Therefore, the claim of the Appellant appellant in general is within under the scope of the AgreementAgreement mentioned in no.12 above. But, as far as the policies [REDACTED] and [REDACTED] are concerned, But the Respondent has succeeded in establishing a valid defence in accordance with the Agreement. According to Section 17.3 Appeal Guidelines the claimant is not entitled to payment from the Foundation funds if;
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Appeal Agreement