Joint Trunk Planning Criteria Clause Samples

Joint Trunk Planning Criteria. In order to facilitate sound and economical network planning and provisioning, the Parties agree to work cooperatively to establish appropriate (i) fill factors for trunks previously deployed for the CD; (ii) compensation arrangements to reflect ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s and the CD’s proportionate use of the trunking; (iii) strand plant or special construction termination charge to CD for not utilizing the ordered trunking; and (iv) to establish appropriate time frames to reflect whether the CD ordered trunking is Currently Available.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Joint Trunk Planning Criteria. In order to facilitate sound and economical network planning and provisioning, CenturyTel deployment of trunks for CD use may be conditioned on (i) fill factors for trunks previously deployed for the CD; (ii) compensation arrangements to reflect CenturyTel’s and the CD’s proportionate use of the trunking; (iii) a stranded plant or special construction termination charge to CD for not utilizing the ordered trunking for the forecasted duration; and (iv) whether the CD ordered trunking is Currently Available.
View Source
Joint Trunk Planning Criteria. In order to facilitate sound and economical network planning and provisioning, UBTA-UBET deployment of trunks for Bresnan use may be conditioned on (i) fill factors for trunks previously deployed for the Bresnan; (ii) a stranded plant or special construction termination charge to Bresnan for not utilizing the ordered trunking for the forecasted duration; and (iv) whether the Bresnan ordered trunking is Currently Available. Notwithstanding the foregoing, trunk orders that UBTA-UBET has the capability to provide shall be filled by UBTA-UBET in the interval that it would provide such facilities to itself or to its own end users.
View Source
Joint Trunk Planning Criteria. In order to facilitate sound and economical network planning and provisioning, CenturyTel deployment of trunks for DAYSTARR use may be conditioned on (i) fill factors for trunks previously deployed for the DAYSTARR; (ii) a stranded plant or special construction termination charge to DAYSTARR for not utilizing the ordered trunking for the forecasted duration; and (iv) whether the DAYSTARR ordered trunking is Currently Available. Notwithstanding the foregoing, trunk orders that CenturyTel has the capability to provide shall be filled by CenturyTel in the interval that it would provide such facilities to itself or to its own end users.
View Source
Joint Trunk Planning Criteria. In order to facilitate sound and economical network planning and provisioning, CenturyTel deployment of trunks for TWTC use may be conditioned on (i) fill factors for trunks previously deployed for the TWTC; (ii) compensation arrangements to reflect CenturyTel’s and the TWTC’s proportionate use of the trunking; (iii) a stranded plant or special construction termination charge to TWTC for not utilizing the ordered trunking for the forecasted duration; and (iv) whether the TWTC ordered trunking is Currently Available.
View Source
Joint Trunk Planning Criteria. In order to facilitate sound and economical network planning and provisioning, deployment of trunks by one Party for the other’s use may be conditioned on (i) fill factors for trunks previously deployed for that Party; (ii) compensation arrangements to reflect CenturyTel’s and the XO’s proportionate use of the trunking; (iii) a stranded plant or special construction termination charge to the originating Party for not utilizing the ordered trunking for the forecasted duration; and (iv) whether the ordered trunking is Currently Available.
View Source
Joint Trunk Planning Criteria. In order to facilitate sound and economical network planning and provisioning, CenturyTel deployment of trunks for Charter use may be conditioned on (i) compensation arrangements to reflect CenturyTel’s and Charter’s proportionate use of the trunking; (ii) a trunk termination charge to Charter for not utilizing the ordered trunking for the forecasted duration; and (iii) whether the Charter ordered trunking is Currently Available.
View Source

Related to Joint Trunk Planning Criteria

  • Multi-year Planning Targets Schedule A may reflect an allocation for the first Funding Year of this Agreement as well as planning targets for up to two additional years, consistent with the term of this Agreement. In such an event, the HSP acknowledges that if it is provided with planning targets, these targets: a. are targets only, b. are provided solely for the purposes of planning, c. are subject to confirmation, and d. may be changed at the discretion of the Funder in consultation with the HSP. The HSP will proactively manage the risks associated with multi-year planning and the potential changes to the planning targets; and the Funder agrees that it will communicate any changes to the planning targets as soon as reasonably possible.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Power Factor Design Criteria Developer shall design the Large Generating Facility to maintain an effective power delivery at demonstrated maximum net capability at the Point of Interconnection at a power factor within the range established by the Connecting Transmission Owner on a comparable basis, until NYISO has established different requirements that apply to all generators in the New York Control Area on a comparable basis. The Developer shall design and maintain the plant auxiliary systems to operate safely throughout the entire real and reactive power design range. The Connecting Transmission Owner shall not unreasonably restrict or condition the reactive power production or absorption of the Large Generating Facility in accordance with Good Utility Practice.