JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS Sample Clauses
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 8 times
JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS. 2.6.1 The Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories will have jurisdiction in respect of any action or proceeding respecting the interpretation or application of the Final Agreement.
2.6.2 The Supreme Court of the Northwest Territories will have jurisdiction to review, on a question of Law or jurisdiction:
(a) an enrolment appeal decision under the Eligibility and Enrolment chapter; and
(b) a decision of an arbitrator under the Dispute Resolution chapter.
JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS. The parties to this Agreement submit to the jurisdiction of the Courts of the Republic of South Africa in the event of any legal proceedings arising from the provisions of this Agreement.
JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS. All disputes arising under or out of this Agreement or in any way connected with this Agreement shall be subject to the jurisdiction of the court of Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India only.
JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS. 20.1 The Courts at Pune alone shall have jurisdiction in all the matters relating or arising out of this agreement.
JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS. Any dispute (including a dispute relating to any non- contractual obligation) will, subject to the arbitration procedure, be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the High Court of South Africa (Western Cape Division, Cape Town). However, the Firm retains the right to commence legal action out of any competent court.
JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS. 20.1 The Courts at Pune alone shall have jurisdiction in all the matters relating or arising out of this agreement.
20.2 The said property is located in the of village dasve [lavasa] as mentioned sector ……./……. of annual ready reconer of 2013 . the value prescribed in accordance with the said annual ready reconer value comes to Rs /- . However the agreed value is the true and correct value
JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS of England
(a) If the relevant Final Terms specify that the PR Debt Instruments and Coupons (and any non-contractual obligations arising out of or in connection therewith) are governed by, and construed in accordance with, English law, this Condition 19.3 applies.
(b) The courts of England are to have jurisdiction to settle any disputes which may arise out of or in connection with (including any non-contractual obligations arising out of or in connection therewith) the PR Debt Instruments and accordingly any legal action or proceedings arising out of or in connection with the PR Debt Instruments (“Proceedings”) may be brought in such courts. The Issuer irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of such courts and waives any objection to Proceedings in such courts whether on the ground of venue or on the ground that the Proceedings have been brought in an inconvenient forum. These submissions are made for the benefit of each PR Debt Instrument Holder and shall not limit the right of any of them to take Proceedings in any other court of competent jurisdiction nor shall the taking of Proceedings in one or more jurisdictions preclude the taking of Proceedings in any other jurisdiction (whether concurrently or not).
JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS. “The Court of the place where the contract has been entered by South Central Railway i.
JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS. The competent Courts in the national Capital Territory of Delhi shall have exclusive jurisdiction to decide any question regarding the interpretation and construction of this Deed or administration of the trust and the related matters.
JURISDICTION OF THE COURTS of New South Wales If the relevant Final Terms specify that the Debt Instruments and Coupons are governed by, and construed in accordance with, New South Wales law, this Condition 19.2 applies. The courts of New South Wales are to have jurisdiction to settle any disputes which may arise out of or in connection with the Debt Instruments and accordingly any legal action or proceedings arising out of or in connection with the Debt Instruments (“Proceedings”) may be brought in such courts. The Issuer irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of the courts and waives any objection to Proceedings in such courts whether on the ground of venue or on the ground that the Proceedings have been brought in an inconvenient forum. These submissions are made for the benefit of each Debt Instrument Holder and shall not limit the right of any of them to take Proceedings in any other court of competent jurisdiction nor shall the taking of Proceedings in one or more jurisdictions preclude the taking of Proceedings in any other jurisdiction (whether concurrently or not).