Launch Readiness Review Sample Clauses

Launch Readiness Review. In accordance with the provisions of Exhibit B (SOW), Contractor shall support the Launch Agency during the Launch Agency's Launch Readiness Review. In the event any Defect in the Satellite is discovered during the Launch Readiness Review, Contractor shall correct such Defects in accordance with Article 13 (Corrective Measures in Unlaunched Satellites and Other Deliverable Items).
View SourceView Similar (4)
Launch Readiness Review. Contractor shall conduct a launch readiness review for each Satellite, which establishes that the Satellite has been successfully integrated on to the selected Launch Vehicle and passed all the safety requirements dictated by the Launch Service Provider as set forth in Exhibit A (“Launch Readiness Review”). Contractor shall either certify Satellite compliance or notify Globalstar of those items which fail to meet the requirements of Exhibits A, B, and C. Upon satisfactory completion by Contractor of all requirements of Exhibits A, B, and C, mutually acceptable to Globalstar and Contractor, Contractor shall provide written notice of the completion of Launch Readiness Review of each Satellite. Upon such notification, a Satellite shall be ready for launch unless, at any time prior to Intentional Ignition, Contractor shall notify Globalstar if a Satellite is not ready for launch. Upon such notification and prior to launch, Contractor shall remedy such deficiencies or satisfactorily complete other conditions acceptable to Globalstar.
View Source
Launch Readiness Review. 40 8.5 IN-ORBIT TESTING AND FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF SATELLITES.....................................................40 8.6 FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF GROUND SPARE SATELLITE..............................................................41 8.7 SATELLITE CONTROL SOFTWARE AND GROUND ENCRYPTORS........................................................41 i
View Source
Launch Readiness Review. 43 APPENDIX 1 REVIEW ITEM DISCREPANCY FORM......................................44 APPENDIX 2 CHANGE REQUEST FORM...............................................45 APPENDIX 3 CONTRACT CHANGE NOTICE FORM.......................................46 APPENDIX 4 REQUEST FOR DEVIATION/WAIVER FORM.................................47 APPENDIX 5 NON-CONFORMANCE REPORT FORM.......................................48 28 June 1996 Issue 3 ORION SATELLITE CORPORATION PART 3(C) ORION 2 SPACECRAFT ON-GROUND TEST REQUIREMENTS Issue: 4 Dated: 15 January 1997
View Source

Related to Launch Readiness Review

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • REVIEW OF WORK The Consultant shall permit the City, its agents and/or employees to review, at any time, all work performed pursuant to the terms of this Agreement at any stage of the work;

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.