Common use of Length of Continuous Service Clause in Contracts

Length of Continuous Service. Bargaining unit members with longer continuous certified/licensed/HQT service, under regular contract, in the Coshocton City School System, will be retained in preference to those with less continuous employment certificated/licensed/HQT to teach in the same field, provided they have comparable evaluations as follows: a. Under House ▇▇▇▇ 153, employees shall receive a final summative evaluation rating of “ineffective”, “developing”, “proficient” or “accomplished”. b. There shall be four (4) categories of comparable evaluations (Category 1, Category 2, Category 3 and Category 4) in which employees shall be placed based upon their final summative evaluation rating. 1) In 2012-13, employees will be placed in Category 1, Category 2, Category 3, or Category 4 based on their final summative evaluation rating received for 2012-13. 2) In 2013-14, employees will be placed in Category 1, Category 2, Category 3, or Category 4 based on their best final summative evaluation rating received for 2012- 13 or 2013-14. 3) Beginning in 2014-15, and thereafter, employees will be placed in Category 1, Category 2, Category 3, or Category 4 based on the final summative evaluation rating they receive for their three (3) most recent evaluations. a) Employees evaluated as “ineffective” for two (2) out of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in Category 4. b) Employees evaluated as “developing” for two (2) out of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in Category 3. c) Employees evaluated as “proficient” for two (2) out of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in Category 2. d) Employees evaluated as “accomplished” for two (2) out of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in Category 1. e) Employees who receive a different final evaluation rating in each of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in the middle category -- i.e. an employee who received a rating in Categories 3, 1 and 2 respectively in their last three (3) evaluations shall be place in the category in the middle which is two (2). f) An employee who earns a final “ineffective” rating within the three (3) years cannot be placed higher than Category 2. g) Employees shall then be separated on a Length of Continuous Service list as follows: 1. First by contract status (Continuing vs. Limited). 2. Next by areas of certification/licensure/HQT. 3. Next by evaluation Categories 1 through 4. 4. And finally, by dates of hire within the four (4) Categories beginning with the oldest date in descending order to the most recent date of hire. h) Beginning in 2013 and each year thereafter, the District shall provide by September 30th via e-mail to the Coshocton City Education Association President a length of continuous service list of all bargaining unit members which shows their contract status, placement in Categories 1 through 4, and their dates of hire. Refer to Article 12 Section 4, Length of Continuous Service List.

Length of Continuous Service. Bargaining unit members with longer continuous certified/licensed/HQT service, under regular contract, in the Coshocton City School System, will be retained in preference to those with less continuous employment certificated/licensed/HQT to teach in the same field, provided they have comparable evaluations as follows: a. Under House ▇▇▇▇ Bill 153, employees shall receive a final summative evaluation rating of “ineffective”, “developing”, “proficient” or “accomplished”. b. There shall be four (4) categories of comparable evaluations (Category 1, Category 2, Category 3 and Category 4) in which employees shall be placed based upon their final summative evaluation rating. 1) In 2012-13, employees will be placed in Category 1, Category 2, Category 3, or Category 4 based on their final summative evaluation rating received for 2012-13. 2) In 2013-14, employees will be placed in Category 1, Category 2, Category 3, or Category 4 based on their best final summative evaluation rating received for 2012- 13 or 2013-14. 3) Beginning in 2014-15, and thereafter, employees will be placed in Category 1, Category 2, Category 3, or Category 4 based on the final summative evaluation rating they receive for their three (3) most recent evaluations. a) Employees evaluated as “ineffective” for two (2) out of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in Category 4. b) Employees evaluated as “developing” for two (2) out of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in Category 3. c) Employees evaluated as “proficient” for two (2) out of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in Category 2. d) Employees evaluated as “accomplished” for two (2) out of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in Category 1. e) Employees who receive a different final evaluation rating in each of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in the middle category -- i.e. an employee who received a rating in Categories 3, 1 and 2 respectively in their last three (3) evaluations shall be place in the category in the middle which is two (2). f) An employee who earns a final “ineffective” rating within the three (3) years cannot be placed higher than Category 2. g) Employees shall then be separated on a Length of Continuous Service list as follows: 1. First by contract status (Continuing vs. Limited). 2. Next by areas of certification/licensure/HQT. 3. Next by evaluation Categories 1 through 4. 4. And finally, by dates of hire within the four (4) Categories beginning with the oldest date in descending order to the most recent date of hire. h) Beginning in 2013 and each year thereafter, the District shall provide by September 30th via e-mail to the Coshocton City Education Association President a length of continuous service list of all bargaining unit members which shows their contract status, placement in Categories 1 through 4, and their dates of hire. Refer to Article 12 Section 4, Length of Continuous Service List.

Length of Continuous Service. Bargaining unit members with longer continuous certified/licensed/HQT service, under regular contract, in the Coshocton City School System, will be retained in preference to those with less continuous employment certificated/licensed/HQT to teach in the same field, provided they have comparable evaluations as follows: a. Under House ▇▇▇▇ 153, employees shall receive a final summative evaluation rating of “ineffective”, “developing”, “proficient” or “accomplished”. b. There shall be four (4) categories of comparable evaluations (Category 1, Category 2, Category 3 and Category 4) in which employees shall be placed based upon their final summative evaluation rating. 1) In 2012-13, employees will be placed in Category 1, Category 2, Category 3, or Category 4 based on their final summative evaluation rating received for 2012-13. 2) In 2013-14, employees will be placed in Category 1, Category 2, Category 3, or Category 4 based on their best final summative evaluation rating received for 2012- 13 or 2013-14. 3) Beginning in 2014-15, and thereafter, employees will be placed in Category 1, Category 2, Category 3, or Category 4 based on the final summative evaluation rating they receive for their three (3) most recent evaluations. a) Employees evaluated as “ineffective” for two (2) out of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in Category 4. b) Employees evaluated as “developing” for two (2) out of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in Category 3. c) Employees evaluated as “proficient” for two (2) out of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in Category 2. d) Employees evaluated as “accomplished” for two (2) out of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in Category 1. e) Employees who receive a different final evaluation rating in each of their last three (3) evaluations shall be placed in the middle category -- i.e. an employee who received a rating in Categories 3, 1 and 2 respectively in their last three (3) evaluations shall be place in the category in the middle which is two (2). f) An employee who earns a final “ineffective” rating within the three (3) years cannot be placed higher than Category 2. g) Employees shall then be separated on a Length of Continuous Service list as follows: 1. First by contract status (Continuing vs. Limited). 2. Next by areas of certification/licensure/HQT. 3. Next by evaluation Categories 1 through 4. 4. And finally, finally by dates of hire within the four (4) Categories beginning with the oldest date in descending order to the most recent date of hire. h) Beginning in 2013 and each year thereafter, the District shall provide by September 30th via e-mail to the Coshocton City Education Association President a length of continuous service list of all bargaining unit members which shows their contract status, placement in Categories 1 through 4, and their dates of hire. Refer to Article 12 Section 4, Length of Continuous Service List.