Common use of Level of Effort Clause in Contracts

Level of Effort. For each work authorization, the Engineer shall base the level of effort at each phase on the prior work developed in earlier phases without unnecessary repetition or re-study. As directed by the State, the Engineer shall provide written justification regarding whether or not additional or repeated level of effort of earlier completed work is warranted, or if additional detail will be better addressed at a later stage in the project development. Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QAQC). The Engineer shall provide peer review at all levels. For each deliverable, the Engineer shall have some evidence of its internal review and ▇▇▇▇-up of that deliverable as preparation for submittal. A milestone submittal is not considered complete unless the required milestone documents and associated internal red-line ▇▇▇▇-ups are submitted. The State’s Project Manager may require the Engineer to submit the Engineer’s internal ▇▇▇▇-up (red-lines) or comments developed as part of the Engineer’s quality control step. When internal ▇▇▇▇-ups are requested by the State in advance, the State, at its sole discretion, may reject the actual deliverable should the Engineer fail to provide the evidence of quality control. The Engineer shall clearly label each document submitted for quality assurance as an internal ▇▇▇▇-up document. Use of the State’s Standards. The Engineer shall identify and insert as frequently as is feasible the applicable, current State’s Standard Details, District Standard Details, or miscellaneous details that have been approved for use in the plans. The Engineer shall sign, seal, and date each Standard and miscellaneous detail if the Standard selected has not been adopted for use in a District. The Engineer shall obtain approval for use of these details during the early stages of design from the State Project Manager or designated State Area Engineer. In addition, these details shall be accompanied by the appropriate general notes, special specifications, special provisions, and method of payment. The Engineer shall retain the responsibility for the appropriate selection of each Standard identified for use within the design. Organization of Plan Sheets. The PS&E shall be complete and organized in accordance with the latest edition of the State’s PS&E Preparation Manual. The PS&E Limited Access to State’s Design and Construction Information System (DCIS). The Engineer shall receive limited access to the State’s DCIS to update responsible engineer information, sign, seal and date, build specification list and develop Project estimate.

Level of Effort. For each work authorization, the Engineer shall base the level of effort at each phase on the prior work developed in earlier phases without unnecessary repetition or re-study. As directed by the State, the Engineer shall provide written justification regarding whether or not additional or repeated level of effort of earlier completed work is warranted, or if additional detail will be better addressed at a later stage in the project development. Quality Assurance (QA) and Quality Control (QAQCQC). The Engineer shall provide peer review at all levels. For each deliverable, the Engineer shall have some evidence of its internal review and ▇▇▇▇-up of that deliverable as preparation for submittal. A milestone submittal is not considered complete unless the required milestone documents and associated internal red-line ▇▇▇▇-ups are submitted. The State’s Project Manager may require the Engineer to submit the Engineer’s internal ▇▇▇▇-up (red-lines) or comments developed as part of the Engineer’s quality control step. When internal ▇▇▇▇-ups are requested by the State in advance, the State, at its sole discretion, may reject the actual deliverable should the Engineer fail to provide the evidence of quality control. The Engineer shall clearly label each document submitted for quality assurance as an internal ▇▇▇▇-up document. Use of the State’s Standards. The Engineer shall identify and insert as frequently as is feasible the applicable, current State’s Standard Details, District Standard Details, or miscellaneous details that have been approved for use in the plans. The Engineer shall sign, seal, and date each Standard and miscellaneous detail if the Standard selected has not been adopted for use in a District. The Engineer shall obtain approval for use of these details during the early stages of design from the State Project Manager or designated State Area Engineer. In addition, these details shall be accompanied by the appropriate general notes, special specifications, special provisions, and method of payment. The Engineer shall retain the responsibility for the appropriate selection of each Standard identified for use within the design. Organization of Plan Sheets. The PS&E shall be complete and organized in accordance with the latest edition of the State’s PS&E Preparation Manual. The PS&E Limited Access to State’s Design and Construction Information System (DCIS). The Engineer shall receive limited access to the State’s DCIS to update responsible engineer information, sign, seal and date, build specification list and develop Project estimate.of

Level of Effort. For each work authorization, the Engineer shall base the level of effort at each phase on the prior work developed in earlier phases without unnecessary repetition or re-study. As directed by the State, the Engineer shall provide written justification regarding whether or not additional or repeated level of effort of earlier completed work is warranted, or if additional detail will be better addressed at a later stage in the project development. Quality Assurance and Quality Control (QAQC). The Engineer shall provide peer review at all levels. For each deliverable, the Engineer shall have some evidence of its internal review and ▇▇▇▇-up mark-up of that deliverable as preparation for submittal. A milestone submittal is not considered complete unless the required milestone documents and associated internal red-line ▇▇▇▇-ups mark-ups are submitted. The State’s Project Manager may require the Engineer to submit the Engineer’s internal ▇▇▇▇-up mark-up (red-lines) or comments developed as part of the Engineer’s quality control step. When internal ▇▇▇▇-ups mark-ups are requested by the State in advance, the State, at its sole discretion, may reject the actual deliverable should the Engineer fail to provide the evidence of quality control. The Engineer shall clearly label each document submitted for quality assurance as an internal ▇▇▇▇-up mark-up document. Use of the State’s Standards. The Engineer shall identify and insert as frequently as is feasible the applicable, current State’s Standard Details, District Standard Details, or miscellaneous details that have been approved for use in the plans. The Engineer shall sign, seal, and date each Standard and miscellaneous detail if the Standard selected has not been adopted for use in a District. The Engineer shall obtain approval for use of these details during the early stages of design from the State Project Manager or designated State Area Engineer. In addition, these details shall be accompanied by the appropriate general notes, special specifications, special provisions, and method of payment. The Engineer shall retain the responsibility for the appropriate selection of each Standard identified for use within the design. Organization of Plan Sheets. The PS&E shall be complete and organized in accordance with the latest edition of the State’s PS&E Preparation Manual. The PS&E Limited Access to State’s Design and Construction Information System (DCIS). The Engineer shall receive limited access to the State’s DCIS to update responsible engineer information, sign, seal and date, build specification list and develop Project estimate.