LITIGATION AND CONTRACT HISTORY Sample Clauses

The Litigation and Contract History clause requires parties to disclose any past or ongoing legal disputes and significant contractual relationships relevant to the agreement. Typically, this involves providing a list or summary of lawsuits, arbitration, or regulatory actions, as well as details of major contracts that could impact the current deal. By mandating this disclosure, the clause helps ensure transparency, allowing parties to assess potential risks and make informed decisions before entering into the contract.
LITIGATION AND CONTRACT HISTORY. Respondent must include in its Solicitation Response a complete disclosure of any alleged or significant contractual failures. In addition, Respondent must disclose any civil or criminal litigation or investigation pending over the last five (5) years that involves Respondent or in which Respondent has been judged guilty or liable. Failure to comply with the terms of this provision may disqualify Respondent. Solicitation Response may be rejected based upon Respondent's prior history with the State of Texas or with any other party that demonstrates, without limitation, unsatisfactory performance, adversarial or contentious demeanor, or significant failure(s) to meet contractual obligations.
View SourceView Similar (6)
LITIGATION AND CONTRACT HISTORY. Respondent must include in its Solicitation Response a complete disclosure of any alleged or significant contractual failures. In addition, Respondent must disclose any civil or criminal litigation or investigation pending over the last five years that involves Respondent or in which Respondent has been judged guilty or liable. Failure to comply with the terms of this provision may disqualify Respondent. Solicitation Response may be rejected based upon Respondent's prior history with the State of Texas or with any other party that demonstrates, without limitation, unsatisfactory performance, adversarial or contentious demeanor, or significant failure(s) to meet contractual obligations. 5.3 CONFLICTS 5.3.1 Contractor must avoid all implications of possible confict of interest ( COI ) between their services for SSA and DDS, and their medical practices as required , and as amended herein. Contractor must avoid: A. Working concurrently with another state agency or under contract with another DDS. B. Performing CEs; C. Acquiring or maintaining, directly or indirectly (including any member of their families) any financial interest in a medical partnership, corporation, or similar relationship in which CEs are provided. D. Participating in the review or determination of a case when 1. they have prior knowledge of that case, e.g. the claimant was a patient; or 2. the adjudicator ( DS ) is a relative (as defined in HHS Human Resources Policy Manual, Chapter 1.D.4., Nepotism); or E. Acting in any official matter which involves a relative, a personal acquaintance, or their own personal records. F. Working as a consultant for an appointed or authorized representative. G. Both actual conflicts of interest as well as the appearance of a conflict of interest. Contractor represents, to the best of his or her knowledge and H. Any potential conflict between interest, including its programs, and their own personal interests. In order to avoid potential conflcits in interest, Contractors must disqualify themselves in questionable situations. Disqualified Contractors must not handle, and are prohibited from
View Source
LITIGATION AND CONTRACT HISTORY. Respondent must include in its Solicitation Response a complete disclosure of any alleged or significant contractual failures. In addition, Respondent must disclose any civil or criminal litigation or investigation pending over the last five (5) years that involves Respondent or in which Respondent has been judged guilty or liable. Failure to comply with the terms of this provision may disqualify Respondent. Solicitation Response may be rejected based upon Respondent's prior history with the State of Texas or with any other party that demonstrates, without limitation, unsatisfactory performance, adversarial or contentious demeanor, or significant failure(s) to meet contractual obligations. Respondent must certify that it does not have any personal or business interests that present a conflict of interest with respect to the RFA and any resulting contract. Additionally, if applicable, the respondent must disclose all potential conflicts of interest. The respondent must describe the measures it will take to ensure that there will be no actual conflict of interest and that its fairness, independence and objectivity will be maintained. The System Agency will determine to what extent, if any, a potential conflict of interest can be mitigated and managed during the term of the contract. Failure to identify actual and potential conflicts of interest may result in disqualification of a Solicitation Response or termination of a contract. Please include any activities of affiliated or parent organizations and individuals who may be assigned to this Contract, if any. Additionally, pursuant to Section 2252.908 of the Texas Government Code, a successful respondent awarded a contract greater than $1 million dollars, or that requires an action or vote of the governing body, must submit a disclosure of interested parties to the state agency at the time the business entity submits the signed contract. Rules and filing instructions may be found on the Texas Ethics Commissions public website and additional instructions will be given by HHSC to successful respondents. Respondent must complete and return all of the following listed forms and exhibits. Exhibits are listed following Article 10.
View Source
LITIGATION AND CONTRACT HISTORY. Respondent must include in its Solicitation Response a complete disclosure of any alleged or significant contractual failures. In addition, Respondent must disclose any civil or criminal litigation or investigation over the last five (5) years that involves Respondent or in which Respondent has been judged guilty or liable including any allegations of such that are currently pending. Respondent must also disclose any settlement agreements entered into in the last five (5) years related to alleged contractual failures. Failure to comply with the terms of this provision may disqualify Respondent. Solicitation Response may be rejected based upon Respondent's prior history with the State of Texas or with any other party that demonstrates, without limitation, unsatisfactory performance, adversarial or contentious demeanor, or significant failure(s) to meet contractual obligations. Failure to comply with the terms of this provision may disqualify Respondent. Solicitation Response may be rejected based upon Respondent's prior history with the State of Texas or with any other party that demonstrates, without limitation, unsatisfactory performance, adversarial or contentious demeanor, or significant failure(s) to meet contractual obligations. Complete this information on Form N Litigation and Contract History.
View Source
LITIGATION AND CONTRACT HISTORY. Respondent must include in its Solicitation Response a complete disclosure of any alleged or significant contractual failures. In addition, Respondent must disclose any civil or criminal litigation or investigation pending over the last five (5) years that involves Respondent or in which Respondent has been judged guilty or liable. Failure to comply with the terms of this provision may disqualify Respondent. Solicitation Responses may be rejected based upon Respondent's prior performance history with the State of Texas, or demonstrated substandard history related to any other elements described in Texas Government Code § 2156.007.
View Source
LITIGATION AND CONTRACT HISTORY. Applicant must: A. Include complete disclosures of any alleged or significant contractual failures using
View Source
LITIGATION AND CONTRACT HISTORY. Using FORM F- LITIGATION AND CONTRACT HISTORY, Respondent must include in its Solicitation Response a complete disclosure of any alleged or significant contractual failures. In addition, Respondent must disclose any civil or criminal litigation or investigation pending over the last five (5) years that involves Respondent or in which Respondent has been judged guilty or liable. Failure to comply with the terms of this provision may disqualify Respondent. Solicitation Response may be rejected based upon Respondent's prior history with the State of Texas or with any other party that demonstrates, without limitation, unsatisfactory performance, adversarial or contentious demeanor, or significant failure(s) to meet contractual obligations.
View Source

Related to LITIGATION AND CONTRACT HISTORY

  • Litigation History There shall be no consistent history of court/arbitral award decisions against the Tenderer, in the last (Specify years). All parties to the contract shall furnish the information in the appropriate form about any litigation or arbitration resulting from contracts completed or ongoing under its execution over the year’s specified. A consistent history of awards against the Tenderer or any member of a JV may result in rejection of the tender.

  • Litigation and Claims No litigation, claim, investigation, administrative proceeding or similar action (including those for unpaid taxes) against Borrower is pending or threatened, and no other event has occurred which may materially adversely affect Borrower’s financial condition or properties, other than litigation, claims, or other events, if any, that have been disclosed to and acknowledged by Lender in writing.

  • Performance and Compliance with Contracts and Credit and Collection Policy The Seller shall (and shall cause the Servicer to), at its expense, timely and fully perform and comply with all material provisions, covenants and other promises required to be observed by it under the Contracts related to the Receivables, and timely and fully comply in all material respects with the applicable Credit and Collection Policies with regard to each Receivable and the related Contract.

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum. b. The intending bidder or the Purchaser is responsible at own costs and expenses to make and shall be deemed to have carried out own search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification on all liabilities and encumbrances affecting the Property, the title particulars as well as the accuracy and correctness of the particulars and information provided. c. The Purchaser shall be deemed to purchase the Property in all respects subject thereto and shall also be deemed to have full knowledge of the state and condition of the Property regardless of whether or not the said search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification have been conducted. d. The Purchaser shall be deemed to have read, understood and accepted these Conditions of Sale prior to the auction and to have knowledge of all matters which would have been disclosed thereby and the Purchaser expressly warrants to the Assignee that the Purchaser has sought independent legal advice on all matters pertaining to this sale and has been advised by his/her/its independent legal advisor of the effect of all the Conditions of Sale. e. Neither the Assignee nor the Auctioneer shall be required or bound to inform the Purchaser of any such matters whether known to them or not and the Purchaser shall raise no enquiry, requisition or objection thereon or thereto.

  • Litigation and Compliance with Law (a) There are no actions, suits, arbitrations, controversies or other proceedings or investigations (or, to the best knowledge and belief of management of FNB, any facts or circumstances which reasonably could result in such), including, without limitation, any such action by any governmental or regulatory authority, which currently exist or are ongoing, pending or, to the best knowledge and belief of management of FNB, threatened, contemplated or probable of assertion, against, relating to or otherwise affecting FNB, its subsidiaries or any of their respective properties, assets or employees which, if determined adversely, could result in liability on the part of FNB or its subsidiaries for, or subject FNB or its subsidiary to, material monetary damages, fines or penalties or an injunction, or which could have a Material Adverse Effect on FNB and its subsidiaries or on FNB’s ability to consummate the Merger. (b) Except for such licenses, permits, orders, authorizations or approvals (“Permits”) the absence of which would not have a Material Adverse Effect on FNB or its subsidiaries, each of FNB and its subsidiaries has all Permits of any federal, state, local or foreign governmental or regulatory body that are material to or necessary for the conduct of its respective business or to own, lease and operate its respective properties. Except as would not have a Material Adverse Effect on FNB and its subsidiaries, all such Permits are in full force and effect and no violations are or have been recorded in respect of any such Permits. No proceeding is pending or, to the best knowledge and belief of management of FNB, threatened or probable of assertion to suspend, cancel, revoke or limit any Permit. (c) Neither FNB nor any of its subsidiaries is subject to any supervisory agreement, enforcement order, writ, injunction, capital directive, supervisory directive, memorandum of understanding or other similar agreement, order, directive, memorandum or consent of, with or issued by any regulatory or other governmental authority (including, without limitation, the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC or the OCC) relating to its financial condition, directors or officers, employees, operations, capital, regulatory compliance or otherwise; there are no judgments, orders, stipulations, injunctions, decrees or awards against FNB or its subsidiaries which in any manner limits, restricts, regulates, enjoins or prohibits any present or past business or practice of FNB or its subsidiaries; and neither FNB nor any of its subsidiaries has been advised or has any reason to believe that any regulatory or other governmental authority or any court is contemplating, threatening or requesting the issuance of any such agreement, order, injunction, directive, memorandum, judgment, stipulation, decree or award. (d) Neither FNB nor any of its subsidiaries is in violation or default under, and each has complied with, all laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders, writs, injunctions or decrees of any court or federal, state, municipal or other governmental or regulatory authority having jurisdiction or authority over it or its business operations, properties or assets (including without limitation all provisions of North Carolina law relating to usury, the Consumer Credit Protection Act, and all other laws and regulations applicable to extensions of credit) except for any such violation, default or noncompliance as does not or would not have a Material Adverse Effect on FNB and its subsidiaries, and, to the best knowledge and belief of management of FNB, there is no basis for any claim by any person or authority for compensation, reimbursement or damages or otherwise for any violation of any of the foregoing.