Lump Sum The Change Order cost is determined by mutual agreement as a lump sum amount changing the Contract Sum allowed for completion of the Work. The Change Order shall be substantiated by documentation itemizing the estimated quantities and costs of all labor, materials and equipment required as well as any ▇▇▇▇-up used. The price change shall include the cost percent allowed for the Contractor's overhead and profit and, if eligible, Time Dependent Overhead Costs.
Lump Sum Payment If an individual JOC Task Order is scheduled for Completion within forty-five (45) days or less, the County will make one payment after thirty (30) days of Work to the Contractor, exclusive of retention. Contractor may request for one payment (including retention payment); however, payment will be made after Final Acceptance of the JOC Task Order.
Lump Sum Payments The retiring allowance shall be paid in annual instalments, to a maximum of three
Payment Options Paper Invoice - Supplier submits a paper invoice to the organisation as standard for each purchase order received. Embedded Purchase Card - This payment option allows the supplier to charge the cost of the goods/services provided to a VISA/MasterCard electronic Purchasing Card (ePC) belonging to a Contracting Authority. The supplier shall receive payment from VISA/MasterCard therefore negating the need to provide an invoice to the Contracting Authority. Consolidated Electronic Invoice - Supplier submits a single invoice covering multiple purchase orders in an electronic file. Self-Billing - Once the Goods Received Note (GRN) has been entered on PECOS P2P, a payment instruction is automatically sent to the Contracting Authority’s finance system to make payment to the supplier for the goods/services received. Electronic Invoices - Supplier submits an electronic invoice either directly to PECOS P2P/relevant system (cXML) and/or via the SG eInvoicing Solution, which can go again direct to PECOS P2P or a Contracting Authority’s finance system.
Public Benefit It is ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇'s understanding that the commitments it has agreed to herein, and actions to be taken by Praeger under this Settlement Agreement confer a significant benefit to the general public, as set forth in Code of Civil Procedure § 1021.5 and Cal. Admin. Code tit. 11, § 3201. As such, it is the intent of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ that to the extent any other private party serves a notice and/or initiates an action alleging a violation of Proposition 65 with respect to Praeger's alleged failure to provide a warning concerning actual or alleged exposure to cadmium prior to use of the Covered Products it has manufactured, distributed, sold, or offered for sale in California, or will manufacture, distribute, sell, or offer for sale in California, such private party action would not confer a significant benefit on the general public as to those Covered Products addressed in this Settlement Agreement, provided that Praeger is in material compliance with this Settlement Agreement.