Main Challenges Clause Samples

The 'Main Challenges' clause identifies and outlines the primary obstacles or difficulties anticipated in the context of the agreement or project. It typically details specific issues such as resource limitations, regulatory hurdles, or technical complexities that may impact the successful execution of the contract. By clearly stating these challenges, the clause helps all parties understand potential risks and prepares them to address or mitigate these issues proactively, ensuring better planning and risk management.
Main Challenges. For achieving the mentioned high performance gains we had to develop advanced clustering schemes that ensure user-centric cooperation for almost all users. At the same time, the inter- cluster interference had to be minimized. Reducing the overall interference floor in the system with respect to intra- as well as inter-cluster interference was another high level goal. The use of appropriate types of user grouping and scheduling proved to be very important and powerful tools. Another task was to find precoders with high performance, low complexity and at the same time robustness against imperfections. Finally, as discussed above, interference mitigation by its nature provides gains only in interference limited scenarios. We assume that the system is working under such conditions.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Main Challenges. (a) What challenges have been experienced during the implementation of this initiative? (b) How did your collaborative overcome these challenges? (c) What would your collaborative do differently if you could start again?
View Source
Main Challenges. Similar to equity instruments, there is no recovery provided in the case of bankruptcy.
View Source
Main Challenges. Despite the power of innovation procurement, a number of barriers are preventing greater use of the approach. These are some of the obstacles2: - Lack of understanding of what innovation procurement is and how it works. - Lack of sufficient procurement expertise for complex purchases. - Risk aversion. - Low interaction and communication between public buyers and potential suppliers. - Lack of public demand. - Too rigid tender specifications that do not give enough space to innovation. - Difficulties in the access to public tenders by potential suppliers. 2 ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.; ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.; ▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, J.; ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇.; ▇▇▇▇, ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ to innovation through public procurement: a supplier perspective. Technovation. Volume 34, Issue 10, October 2014, Pages 631-645 ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/publication/261918143_Barriers_to_innovation_through_public_procurement_A_supplier The specific communication objectives of Procure2Innovate are the following: • Raise awareness and interest on innovation procurement • Promote the Procure2Innovate project, including the work and services of the competence centres for innovation procurement to various target groups at the European level • Conduct European-level promotion of the network of competence centres • Attract newcomer countries (without established competence centres) to join the Procure2Innovate Network • Support the communication work of the individual competence centres, namely country-level communications • Support communication with respect to cross-border joint procurement ambitions In simple terms, the consortium’s goals for the duration of the communication and dissemination mandate within Procure2Innovate will be to:
View Source
Main Challenges. Higher customer Expectation;
View Source
Main Challenges 
View Source

Related to Main Challenges

  • Challenges The Experts may be challenged by either Party if circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to any of their impartiality or independence. In such circumstances the challenge shall be brought by written notice to the ICC copied to the other Party within fourteen (14) calendar days of the appointment of the relevant Expert or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the challenging Party becoming aware of the circumstances giving rise to the challenge. Unless the challenged Expert withdraws. or whichever of the Parties that has not brought the challenge agrees to the challenge, within fourteen (14) calendar days of the challenge, the ICC shall decide the challenge and, if appropriate, shall appoint a replacement Expert in accordance with the criteria set out herein.

  • No Challenges In no event shall any Secured Party take any action to challenge, contest or dispute the validity, extent, enforceability, or priority of the Collateral Agent’s Liens hereunder or under any other Security Document with respect to any of the Collateral, or that would have the effect of invalidating any such Lien or support any Person who takes any such action. Each of the Secured Parties agrees that it will not take any action to challenge, contest or dispute the validity, enforceability or secured status of any other Secured Party’s claims against any Obligor (other than any such claim resulting from a breach of this Agreement by a Secured Party, or any challenge, contest or dispute alleging arithmetical error in the determination of a claim), or that would have the effect of invalidating any such claim, or support any Person who takes any such action.

  • No Challenge Each Stockholder agrees not to commence, join in, facilitate, assist or encourage, and agrees to take all actions necessary to opt out of any class in any class action with respect to, any claim, derivative or otherwise, against Parent, Merger Sub, the Company or any of their respective successors or directors (a) challenging the validity of, or seeking to enjoin the operation of, any provision of this Agreement or the Merger Agreement or (b) alleging a breach of any fiduciary duty of any person in connection with the evaluation, negotiation or entry into the Merger Agreement.

  • Challenge If Executive violates or challenges the enforceability of any provisions of the Restrictive Covenants or this Release, no further payments, rights or benefits under Section 5 of the Agreement will be due to Executive (except where such provision would be prohibited by applicable law, rule or regulation).

  • Patent Challenge 6.5.1 Licensor may terminate this Agreement, effective immediately upon written notice to Licensee, upon the commencement by Licensee or any of its Affiliates of a Patent Challenge. 6.5.2 Licensee shall include in each sublicense agreement entered into with a Sublicensee a right of Licensee to terminate such sublicense agreement if such Sublicensee commences a Patent Challenge; and Licensee shall terminate the sublicense agreement, effective immediately upon written notice to the Sublicensee, if the Sublicensee commences a Patent Challenge. In addition, if the Sublicensee’s commencement of a Patent Challenge gives Licensor’s licensor a right of termination under the Penn Agreement and such licensor threatens to terminate the Penn Agreement, then, upon receipt of notice to such effect, Licensor may terminate this Agreement, effective immediately upon written notice to Licensee, if the Sublicensee commences a Patent Challenge. 6.5.3 For purposes of this Section 6.5, “Patent Challenge” means any action against Licensor or the University of Pennsylvania or SmithKline ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Corporation (or their successors under the Existing Licenses), including an action for declaratory judgment, to declare or render invalid or unenforceable the Licensed Patents, or any claim thereof.