Market Testing Procedure Sample Clauses

Market Testing Procedure. If this Project Agreement requires Market Testing, the following procedure will apply: (a) at least three (3) months before each Market Testing Review Date the parties will meet together as often as may be necessary to consider to agree: (i) the number and identity of prospective tenderers that will be invited to prepare and submit tenders for the Testable Services in question provided that any prospective tenderer will possess an appropriate degree of skill, resources, reputation and financial standing relative to the provision of the Testable Services in question (and any dispute as to the selection of a prospective tenderer will be determined in accordance with the Dispute Resolution Procedure); (ii) the appropriate manner of advertising the Testable Services; (iii) the identity of members of the evaluation panel 50% of which may be comprised of Authority representatives; (iv) any changes to the Testable Services in question; and (v) the form and contents of the tender documents (which will include a Testable Services specification) relevant to the Services to be delivered to prospective tenderers (the “Testable Services Tender Documents”) which will be incorporated into an agreed document (the “Market Testing Procedure”). (b) If the parties are unable to agree any of the matters set out in the Market Testing Procedure either Party may refer the matter to the Dispute Resolution Procedure. (c) PPP Co. will manage the Market Testing tendering process in accordance with the Market Testing Procedure. (d) The evaluation panel will select the most economically advantageous tender based on the evaluation criteria agreed in the Market Testing Procedure and will not be obliged to accept the lowest tender. (e) Where the evaluation panel fails to agree which of the tenders is the most economically advantageous within thirty (30) Business Days following the expiry of the tender period, any dispute will be determined in accordance with the Dispute Resolution Procedure.
View SourceView Similar (6)
Market Testing Procedure. ▇▇▇▇▇ must obtain the approval of the Relevant Participant(s) in each case for: (subject to the provisions of paragraph 5.2.1(b) (Grouping of Services)) any grouping or groupings of Market Tested Elements or any division of any Market Tested Element into separate parts which will optimise the opportunity for the Participants to obtain best value for money; the appropriate media for advertising the Market Tested Elements and identifying the Prospective Tenderers (who should be wider than the supply chain to be maintained from time to time pursuant to paragraph 1.2 of Section 1 (Specification) of Schedule Part 3 (Partnering Services)); the basis on which the Tenderers shall be selected by hubco from among the Prospective Tenderers; the Tender Requirements (which shall be in sufficient detail to allow the party carrying out the Market Test to determine the Preferred Tenderer) and shall include, without limitation: a statement of the Tender Validity Period; requirements in respect of the possible grouping or groupings of Market Tested Elements and any division of any Market Tested Element into separate parts; details of the tender evaluation criteria, which shall:
View Source

Related to Market Testing Procedure

  • Testing Procedures The following test procedure shall apply to all urine tests administered to bargaining unit employees: a. Urine specimens shall be collected at the approved laboratory as stated below in section (e), or at an accredited medical facility when necessary after an accident. b. The employee shall not be observed when the urine specimen is given. c. All specimen containers, vials or bags used to transport the samples shall be sealed with evidence tape and labeled in the presence of the employee. d. The testing shall be done by another approved laboratory. e. The employer shall choose the testing/collection facility to be utilized for toxicology testing on a yearly basis. f. The following standards shall be used to determine what levels of detected substances shall be considered positive. Note: - These are current levels subject to change by Federally Mandated Regulations. Current Federal Regulations shall be controlling in case of change or conflict: DRUG SCREENING TEST CONFIRMATION Amphetamines 500 ng/ml Amphetamine 250 ng/ml GC-MS Marijuana Metabolites 50 ng/▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇-THC 15 ng/ml GC-MS Cocaine Metabolites 150 ng/ml Metabolites 100 ng/ml GC-MS Opiates Morphine 2,000 ng/ml 2,000 ng/ml GC-MS PCP 25 ng/ml PCP 25 ng/ml GC-MS MDMA 500 ng/ml 250 ng/ml Alcohol .08 Breath .04 Breath – Employees with CDL .02 - .039 Breath - Employees with CDL will be removed from service for 24 hrs. g. Tests which are below the levels set forth above shall be determined as negative. If test results are negative, all non-required documentation regarding supervisors' observations and testing will be destroyed. h. At the time the urine specimen is collected two samples will be taken. One sample will be sent to the laboratory to be tested at the employer's expense. If the first sample tests positive then upon written request by the employee within twenty-four

  • Posting Procedure (a) Except as otherwise provided, all positions shall be posted as they arise and shall be posted using the standard posting format (see Appendix C). (b) All postings shall include the following: (1) the Bargaining Unit to which the posting applies; (2) the type of position (i.e. GTA, GSA-­‐1, UTA); (3) if possible, the number of position(s) available; (4) the course name and number; (5) the start and termination dates for the appointment; (6) the level of appointment (i.e. full, or portion of); (7) assigned responsibilities; (8) required and preferred qualifications (academic and/or professional); (9) application deadline; (10) wages; (11) any applicable equity provisions; and (12) the current University of Guelph’s employment equity statement, which may be amended from time to time through discussion with stakeholder groups through the Employment Equity Committee. (c) Where a course has both In-­‐Class and DE section(s), the DE sections(s) shall be posted separately from the In-­‐Class section(s). In situations where the University anticipates that the position may be available for two (2) or three (3) semesters, the posting shall clearly indicate this possibility. The decision to appoint an employee for more than one (1) semester at a time shall be at the sole discretion of the University (see also 11.04 (d)). (d) Positions shall be posted by the Department electronically on the Central Job Posting Website for TAs, GSA-­‐1s, & Sessional Lecturers, within the time frames provided for in this Article. At the time of posting the Union shall receive electronic notification. (e) The University shall respond to inquiries from the Union with regard to posting criteria as specified in (a), (b) and (c). The Union shall notify FASR in writing of postings which in the Union’s view do not comply with the requirements of (a), (b) and (c). The University shall consult with the appropriate Union designate(s) within two (2) days of receipt of such notice, and where the Parties agree the posting did not meet the posting criteria as specified in (a),

  • Bumping Procedure In the application of this Article, permanent part-time employees cannot displace permanent full-time employees or vice versa provided that permanent full-time employees who have exhausted their bumping rights hereunder and are to be laid off from work shall have the right to displace a permanent part-time employee with lesser GO seniority, within their section. Such bumping within the section may only be in a downward or lateral direction provided they are qualified, willing and able to do the work (refer to Schedule “E-I” and “E-I OFPT”). Downward shall be defined as lesser pay per hour and/or lesser hours per week (permanent full-time vs. permanent part-time). Lateral shall be defined as same pay per hour. In the application of this Article, permanent part-time employees cannot displace permanent full-time employees or vice versa provided that permanent full-time employees who have exhausted their bumping rights hereunder and are to be laid off from work, shall have the right to displace any permanent part-time employee with lesser GO Transit seniority, within their section provided they are able, willing and qualified. Due to the nature of the bumping procedure and the unpredictability of the direction and results of that bumping, the layoff must take precedent over all other normal movement of employees (i.e., standing applications). During layoffs an employee may choose to accept an open position for which he/she is qualified rather than bumping within their classification or section and should he/she elect this option, they shall retain recall rights to the original classification without loss of seniority. Where an OFPT employee who has been notified or is on layoff and currently possesses the qualifications and skills of a position they have held previously, then the employee may bump laterally or downward within their section or another section where the previously held position is identified. At the time of layoff the employee must satisfy the criteria identified in the current job description, and the employee must have satisfied the performance standards of that classification. Should the parties agree that the bumping procedure will likely cause significant movement within a classification or section, then the parties may agree to have a “master” sign-up take place which will be the sole responsibility of the Union to administer.

  • Testing Procedure Limitations The Asset Representations Reviewer will only be required to perform the testing procedures listed under “Tests” in Schedule A, and will have no obligation to perform additional procedures on any Subject Lease or to provide any information other than a Review Report indicating for each Subject Lease whether there was a Test Pass or a Test Fail for each Test, or whether the Subject Lease was a Test Complete and the related reason. However, the Asset Representations Reviewer may provide additional information about any Subject Lease that it determines in good faith to be material to the Review.

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Telepak Networks will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Telepak Networks must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non-designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Telepak Networks will be required to provide the results of the Telepak Networks test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop. 2.1.6.2 Once Telepak Networks has isolated a trouble to the BellSouth provided Loop, and had issued a trouble report to BellSouth on the Loop, BellSouth will take the actions necessary to repair the Loop if a trouble actually exists. BellSouth will repair these Loops in the same time frames that BellSouth repairs similarly situated Loops to its End Users. 2.1.6.3 If Telepak Networks reports a trouble on a non-designed or designed Loop and no trouble actually exists, BellSouth will charge Telepak Networks for any dispatching and testing (both inside and outside the CO) required by BellSouth in order to confirm the Loop’s working status. 2.1.6.4 In the event BellSouth must dispatch to the end-user’s location more than once due to incorrect or incomplete information provided by Telepak Networks (e.g., incomplete address, incorrect contact name/number, etc.), BellSouth will ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Networks for each additional dispatch required to repair the circuit due to the incorrect/incomplete information provided. BellSouth will assess the applicable Trouble Determination rates from BellSouth’s FCC or state tariffs.