Media Capabilities Sample Clauses

The Media Capabilities clause defines the rights and limitations regarding the use, access, and distribution of various media formats or technologies within an agreement. It typically outlines which parties are permitted to utilize specific media channels—such as print, digital, broadcast, or streaming—and may set technical standards or restrictions for content delivery. This clause ensures that all parties have a clear understanding of their media-related rights and obligations, thereby preventing disputes over unauthorized use or distribution and safeguarding proprietary content.
Media Capabilities. FLAME provides a set of media capabilities as a part of the project offering. These media capabilities will be available for experimenters and particularly for the entities that participate in the project as result of the open calls. These capabilities are provided in FLAME by means of Foundation Media Services, which offer an initial set of basic functionalities useful for a variety of media implementations, such as storage capacity and adaptive streaming. In this way, the Foundation Media Services can be seen as packetized media components. FLAME has defined a list of Foundation Media Services, which will be implemented along the project work plan. Some of these Foundation Media Services has been selected to take advantage of the key FLAME benefits, based on the project technical approach, such as reduced latency or secure content access, as described in Section 7.2. The Foundation Media Services that will be ready for the 3rd parties involved in the project after the first open call are depicted in the table. Metadata database This component consists in a generic database to store metadata, which is a required module in most of media services. Some complex media services require the stateful replication of a synchronised database. For example, a certain service may require a replicated metadata database in the edge to improve the availability of media contents. FLAME benefits and technological innovations enable an efficient procedure for the replication of databases. Content ingest and storage This component enables the insertion of assets to be delivered in media services. By means of a REST API, assets can be uploaded, deleted and downloaded. The component includes a local database to keep some data about the stored contents. The FLAME platform capabilities enable a smart replication of this component for a better service performance. Media quality analysis This component provides information about a certain media asset, including technical information (codec, duration, framerate, resolution, bitrate) and also an estimation of its visual quality. Transcoding and transrating and content conditioning Transcoding consists in the change of the video or audio specification to represent the content of an asset (source encoding). Transrating is a similar process but in this case the encoding specification does not change. Transcoding and transrating typically aim to reduce the bitrate of an asset (this processing will cause a reduction of the quality, too)....
View SourceView Similar (3)
Media Capabilities. The CMS shall include Modules to make it easy to deliver rich-media material on County Web Sites. This includes capability to view, stream and provide download options of videos, slideshows and photo albums through the CMS’s Photo Manager/Slideshow and Media Manager Modules.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Media Capabilities. There have been a number of efforts to examine the communication capabilities introduced by information and communication technologies. Arguably one of the most influential contributions to current scholarship on media selection is Media Synchronicity Theory (▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. 1999). Media synchronicity theory suggests that communication can be encapsulated in two key processes: conveyance and convergence. In addition, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ suggests that media are best analyzed based on communication capabilities, and Media Synchronicity Theory provides a concise summary of the theoretical foundation for each. These capabilities (feedback, symbol variety, parallelism, rehearsability, and reprocessability) can be matched with the communication processes of conveyance or convergence to optimize communication depending on the level of equivocality associated with the task being performed (▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. 1999). Media Synchronicity Theory provides a much needed foundation for categorizing media beyond physical properties. Other frameworks have been suggested, but Media Synchronicity provides a parsimonious model. This framework for categorizing capabilities will be employed and expanded in the current research. In addition to the capabilities proposed by ▇▇▇▇▇▇, this research will explore an additional capability afforded by communications media: discretion. In part, Media Synchronicity Theory is based on the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Theory that outlines the fundamental basis for communication systems. Dennis’s communication capabilities--velocity, parallelism, symbol sets, rehearsability, reprocessability--are drawn from ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ concepts of channel capacity, frequencies, symbol types, encoding, and decoding respectively (▇▇▇▇▇▇ 2008) (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. 1949). In a follow-up to his seminal Communication Theory, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ introduced his Communication Theory of Secrecy Systems (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1949), which provided a conceptual framework for “secrecy systems” to conceal messages and ensure privacy. Although focused on providing a theoretical foundation for cryptography, this early work highlighted the importance of scholarship related to information privacy and communication security. Decades later, research on privacy and information security spans multiple disciplines including computer science, economics, information systems, and public policy, among others. Concern for controlling the flow of information between parties with potentially different priorities, values, or objectives is at th...
View Source
Media Capabilities. Arguably one of the most influential contributions to current scholarship on media selection is Media Synchronicity Theory (▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. 1999). Media Synchronicity Theory suggests that communication can be encapsulated in two key processes: conveyance and convergence. In addition, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ suggests that media are best analyzed based on communication capabilities, and Media Synchronicity Theory provides a concise summary of the theoretical foundation for each. These capabilities (feedback, symbol variety, parallelism, rehearsability, and reprocessability) can be matched with the communication processes of conveyance or convergence to optimize communication depending on the level of equivocality associated with the task being performed (▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. 1999). Media Synchronicity Theory provides a much needed foundation for categorizing media beyond physical properties. Instead the media capabilities framework provides a high level view of media affordances that transcends specific technologies. This framework for categorizing capabilities will be employed and expanded in the current research. In addition to the capabilities proposed by ▇▇▇▇▇▇, this research will explore an additional capability afforded by communications media: discretion. Adaptive Structuration Theory provides the most comprehensive theoretical lens for framing the interplay between technology and social structures. It posits that technology
View Source

Related to Media Capabilities

  • Capabilities A. The Parties agree that the DRE must possess the legal, technical, and financial capacity to: (1) Accept and expend non-federal funds consistent with Section 4.2.4; (2) Accept transfer of the FERC license and title for the Facilities from PacifiCorp; (3) Seek and obtain necessary permits and other authorizations to implement Facilities Removal; (4) Enter into appropriate contracts and grant agreements for effectuating Facilities Removal; (5) Perform, directly or by oversight, Facilities Removal; (6) Prevent, mitigate, and respond to damages the DRE or any of its contractors, subcontractors, or assigns cause during the course of Facilities Removal, and, consistent with Applicable Law, respond to and defend associated liability claims against the DRE or any of its contractors, subcontractors, or assigns, including costs thereof and any judgments or awards resulting therefrom; (7) Carry the required insurance and bonding set forth in Appendix L to respond to liability and damages claims associated with Facilities Removal against the DRE or any of its contractors, subcontractors, or assigns; (8) Meet the deadlines set forth in Exhibit 4; and (9) Perform such other tasks as are reasonable and necessary for Facilities Removal. B. Before the DRE and PacifiCorp file the joint application to transfer the license for the Facilities, the DRE will Timely demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of the States and PacifiCorp that it possesses the legal, technical, and financial capacity to accomplish the tasks in Sections 7.1.2.A(1) through (5), (8), and (9). PacifiCorp and the States will consult if the DRE fails to make the demonstration required in this subsection. C. Within six months of the DRE’s execution of the Settlement, the DRE will include in an informational filing in the FERC license transfer proceeding proof that it possesses the legal, technical, and financial capacity to accomplish the tasks in Sections 7.1.2.A(6) and (7). This filing will include documentation that the DRE meets the requirements of Parts II, III, and IV of Appendix L and is capable of fulfilling its obligations under Section 7.1.3. The DRE will not provide the filing if either of the States or PacifiCorp objects to the filing after a reasonable opportunity to review before submission to FERC. The six-month deadline may be changed by agreement of the DRE, the States, and PacifiCorp. The Parties will Meet and Confer if the DRE fails to provide the informational filing to FERC.

  • Telemedicine Services This plan covers clinically appropriate telemedicine services when the service is provided via remote access through an on-line service or other interactive audio and video telecommunications system in accordance with R.I. General Law § 27-81-1. Clinically appropriate telemedicine services may be obtained from a network provider, and from our designated telemedicine service provider. When you seek telemedicine services from our designated telemedicine service provider, the amount you pay is listed in the Summary of Medical Benefits. When you receive a covered healthcare service from a network provider via remote access, the amount you pay depends on the covered healthcare service you receive, as indicated in the Summary of Medical Benefits. For information about telemedicine services, our designated telemedicine service provider, and how to access telemedicine services, please visit our website or contact our Customer Service Department.

  • Speed The relative importance we attach is “high”.

  • Connectivity User is solely responsible for providing and maintaining all necessary electronic communications with Exchange, including, wiring, computer hardware, software, communication line access, and networking devices.

  • Train Fund Tri- Fund Total Pkg. W. D. Ded. OPDC Dues Ind. Fund 05/01/07 17.98 1.80 2.40 2.80 0.15 0.05 25.18 1.10 0.25 0.16 05/01/08 18.44 1.84 2.40 3.00 0.15 0.05 25.88 1.10 0.35 0.16 05/01/09 18.89 1.89 2.50 3.10 0.15 0.05 26.58 1.10 0.35 0.16 01/01/10 19.16 1.92 2.50 3.20 0.15 0.05 26.98 1.10 0.35 0.16