Methodology and Approach Clause Samples
The 'Methodology and Approach' clause defines the specific processes, techniques, and strategies that will be used to complete a project or deliver a service. It typically outlines the step-by-step methods, tools, and frameworks the party will employ, and may include timelines, milestones, or quality standards to be met. By clearly specifying how work will be performed, this clause ensures both parties have a shared understanding of expectations and deliverables, reducing the risk of misunderstandings or disputes over project execution.
Methodology and Approach. This section describes the Alaska HIE Assessment methodology and approach as agreed upon by DHCS. The assessment criteria were defined to support the ONC grant requirements as well as the contractual agreements between DHSS and AeHN. Cognosante selected the five domains defined by the ONC in the FOA. Cognosante developed a set of desired documentation that represented information supporting the domain criteria. In addition, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ identified key stakeholder positions that had experience with either the AeHN BOD or the program at large, these stakeholders would inform the assessment regarding perception, activities and communication penetration. Cognosante focused the assessment information gathering on six key activities: Individual stakeholder interviews Review of key documentation Group question and answer sessions with Orion Health staff Internet research Interaction with AeHN Board of Directors at August meeting in person and September 2011 Annual meeting via conference line Discussions with the HIT Project Office to provide historical perspective and context
Methodology and Approach. 4.1 It is commonly accepted that FVAs are produced using a residual valuation model. The FVA has been produced using ARGUS Developer as the financial model. ARGUS Developer is widely recognised as the leading model for residual valuations within the development industry and is commonly used by practitioners.
4.2 The RICS defines financial viability for planning purposes as;
4.3 The residual model includes a number of input elements to establish a residual Site Value after a predetermined level of return to the developer. The Site Value, developer's return and other costs in the residual valuation are discussed in section 7.
4.4 The FVA has been prepared in accordance with the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors' (RICS) guidance note 'Financial viability in planning'. The RICS' guidance note is consistent with the Localism Act 2011, the NPPF and Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Regulations 2010. The RICS guidance note is also complementary to the Local Housing Delivery Group's advice on area-wide viability testing entitled 'Viability Testing Local Plans'.
Methodology and Approach. Introduction Project Design
Methodology and Approach. Our methodology and approach are organized according to the proposed Sections and Appendices of the MHMP Update. The Sections have been established based upon DMA 2002 requirements and are similar to the structure of the 2008 MHMP. Our methodology notes what each section will contain, then explains how we will update each section.
Methodology and Approach. The service provider shall include the methodologies and the approach they will be using for the security assessment and the penetration testing. ✓ How the Security assessment will be carried out ✓ The activities that will be carried out form within FMFB-A network or from outside ✓ Tool to be used for the security assessment and exploitation ✓ How the simulated attack and penetration testing will be carried out ✓ Expectation and responsibilities of FMFB-A IT department. ✓ Audit Around the system ✓ Auditing through the system ✓ Auditing with the system
Methodology and Approach.
1. In the “Discovery” phase, we will work with the Cities to identify the project teams, establish the foundation for effective project communication, and officially kick off the project. We will conduct a thorough discovery of the Cities specific objectives and needs to ensure all the features, functions, and requirements (e.g. user, interface, conversion, technical, etc.) necessary are defined, documented, and communicated through the resulting documents for inclusion in the RFP.
2. In the “Budget” phase, we will develop preliminary budget estimates and estimated timelines.
3. In the “RFP” phase, we will work with the Cities to develop the RFP documents. In addition, as previously mentioned, we added two components to this phase: Selection – where we will provide the structure for a fair and organized means to complete the review and decision process to select the best solution presented, including agendas and scripts for vendor Proof-of-Capabilities (POC) sessions, and Negotiation – where we will assist the Cities in negotiating their final agreements with the selected vendors.
4. In the “System Implementation” phase, we will manage a Master Project Plan, facilitate the relationships between the Cities and the selected vendors, and develop bi-weekly project status reports. Figure 3 provides an overview of the phases, activities, and deliverables for our proposed methodology.
3.1 Prepare Draft RFP(s) 3.2 – Review Draft RFP(s) with Stakeholders
Methodology and Approach. Meridian Partners knows that smart ideas are only the beginning. From concept creation through implementation, smart ideas require smart strategies in order to become sustainable successes. The goals of every strategy engagement depend on the type of client, their goals, and their landscape. In the interest of providing a high-level overview of the goals and processes involved in a management consulting engagement, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ has provided the steps involved in a sample comprehensive strategy engagement below.
Step 1: Opportunity validation
Step 2: Business Model Optimization
Methodology and Approach. The methodology for carrying out the ICA shall include but will not be limited to:
Methodology and Approach. The NIA was conducted using SoundPLAN 8.2. This is a commercial, three-dimensional, computer- based, noise-modeling software that is used to generate noise level predictions to aid in ascertaining the environmental impact of the proposed facility on the surrounding environment. The results of this assessment will compare the predicted noise levels of the ADR operations to the MPNL’s outlined in the ACNO ordinance (as summarized in Table 1 of section 3). The ISO 9613-1 & 2 international standards are utilized in this software as they are widely accepted both internationally as well as in North America. The algorithms used in this commercial software package are based on methods and theory accepted in the environmental acoustics community. Both detailed source technical information and location specific topography, are used to generate comprehensive noise predictions that take into account environmental conditions, buildings, ground cover, and barriers (natural, topographical and otherwise). Note that actual field measurements may differ from modeled noise levels on any given day due to ever changing environmental factors and other noise sources in the study area not explicitly in the computer model. Table 2 below lists the conditions used in the model.
Methodology and Approach