Methods of Pupil Assessment Sample Clauses

Methods of Pupil Assessment. The Charter School shall evaluate pupils’ work based on the assessment strategies required by Indiana law and those additional measures, if any, identified in Schedule 8 or by utilizing assessment methods required by the OCS from time to time.‌‌
Methods of Pupil Assessment. (Unique to School) Identifies, contractually, the assessments to be administered by the Academy. Typically, contractually, the Academy is required to administer, the identified State assessments, along with all other state-required assessments and a secondary assessment (i.e. NWEA MAP) Section f Application and Enrollment of Students (Unique to School) Specifies enrollment numbers as directed by the Academy; outlines the legal requirements for enrolling students, with specific detail on how the Academy will ensure fair and equitable enrollment practices, including how to administer, legally, a random selection drawing, if necessary.
Methods of Pupil Assessment. The Academy shall properly administer the academic assessments identified in Schedule 7e and in accordance with the requirements detailed in the Master Calendar provided by the District. The Academy shall provide the District direct access to the results of these assessments, along with any other measures of academic achievement reasonably requested by the District.
Methods of Pupil Assessment. 9 Section 6.6. Application and Enrollment of Students. 9
Methods of Pupil Assessment. The Academy shall evaluate pupils’ work based on the assessment strategies identified in Schedule 7. To the extent applicable, the pupil performance of the Academy shall be assessed using all State required tests or as may be required by the CSO under Applicable Law. The Academy shall also annually administer a nationally- normed test to each grade or grouping level, except that the CSO Director may exempt grades K-1 from this requirement at his or her discretion. The Academy shall provide the CSO with copies of reports, assessments and test results concerning the following:

Related to Methods of Pupil Assessment

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013). 6.3.2 Teachers shall use their professional judgment to determine which assessment and/or evaluation tool(s) from the Board list of preapproved assessment tools is applicable, for which student(s), as well as the frequency and timing of the tool. In order to inform their instruction, teachers must utilize diagnostic assessment during the school year.

  • Advertisement on Project Highway The Project Highway or any part thereof shall not be used in any manner to advertise any commercial product or services.

  • Study Population ‌ Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post enterostomy closure, following enterostomy closure (12-month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 month of overall study duration).

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.