Common use of Misconduct and Serious Misconduct Clause in Contracts

Misconduct and Serious Misconduct. 66.1. If an allegation of misconduct or serious misconduct (as defined in clauses 66.15 and 66.16) is made, the staff member will be: (a) advised in writing of the alleged misconduct or serious misconduct, including details of the allegations and whether they are considered to be serious misconduct; and (b) given a reasonable opportunity to be heard and/or to make written submissions, within 10 working days, in relation to the allegations. 66.2. If the staff member admits to the allegations, and if appropriate in the University’s view, the University may give the staff member a reasonable opportunity to improve their conduct, and otherwise the matter will be considered by the Vice-Chancellor under clause 66.6.

Misconduct and Serious Misconduct. 66.1. 7.2.2.1 If an allegation of misconduct or serious misconduct (as defined in clauses 66.15 and 66.16clause 1.3) is made, the staff member will be: (a) advised in writing of the alleged misconduct or serious misconduct, including details of the allegations and whether they are considered to be serious misconduct; and (b) given a reasonable opportunity to be heard and/or to make written submissions, within 10 working days, in relation to the allegations. 66.2. 7.2.2.2 If the staff member admits to the allegations, and if appropriate in the University’s view, the University may give the staff member a reasonable opportunity to improve their conduct, and otherwise the matter will be considered by the Vice-Chancellor and President under clause 66.67.2.4.