NMFS Findings Clause Samples

NMFS Findings. For each Covered Species within the jurisdiction of NMFS which is a Federal Listed Species, NMFS finds that the HCP has satisfied the permit issuance criteria under Section 10(a)(2)(B) of FESA in that: (i) the Taking of the Covered Species will be incidental; (ii) PALCO will, to the maximum extent practicable, minimize and mitigate the impacts of the Taking; (iii) PALCO has ensured that adequate funding for the HCP will be provided; (iv) the Taking of the Covered Species will not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the survival and recovery of the Covered Species in the wild; (v) the other measures required by NMFS as being necessary or appropriate for purposes of the HCP will be met; and (vi) NMFS has received such other assurances as NMFS required that the HCP will be implemented. For each Covered Species which is not a Federal Listed Species, NMFS finds that the HCP has satisfied the permit issuance criteria under Section 10(a)(2)(B) of the FESA that would otherwise apply if such Covered Species were a Federal Listed Species.
View Source
NMFS Findings. As further described in the findings issued by the NMFS, the NMFS has found that the HCP/NCCP satisfies the permit issuance criteria under Section 10(a)(2)(B) of ESA for each Covered Species that is a Federal Listed Species within the jurisdiction of the NMFS. For each Covered Species that is not a Federal Listed Species as of the Effective Date, NMFS has found that the HCP/NCCP satisfies the permit issuance criteria under section 10(a)(2)(B) of the ESA that would otherwise apply if such Covered Species were a Federal Listed Species.
View Source

Related to NMFS Findings

  • Audit Findings Vendor shall implement any required safeguards as identified by Citizens or by any audit of Vendor’s privacy and security controls.

  • How Do I Get More Information? This Notice summarizes the Action, the terms of the Settlements, and your rights and options in connection with the Settlements. More details are in the Settlement Agreements, which are available for your review at ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. The Settlement Website also has the Second Amended Complaint and other documents relating to the Settlements. You may also call toll-free ▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇ or write the Claims Administrator at: Financial Aid Antitrust Settlements, c/o Claims Administrator, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇. To: Settlement Class Member Email Address From: Claims Administrator Subject: Notice of Proposed Class Action Settlement – ▇▇▇▇▇, et al. ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ University, et al. Please visit ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ for more information. • The Court has preliminarily approved proposed settlements (“Settlements”) with the following ten schools: Brown University, the University of Chicago, the Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, Trustees of Dartmouth College, Duke University, Emory University, Northwestern University, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ University, Vanderbilt University, and Yale University (collectively the “Settling Universities”). • The Court has also preliminarily approved a class of students who attended one or more of the Settling Universities during certain time periods. This is referred to as the “Settlement Class,” which is defined in more detail below.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Presentation of Potential Target Businesses The Company shall cause each of the Initial Shareholders to agree that, in order to minimize potential conflicts of interest which may arise from multiple affiliations, the Initial Shareholders will present to the Company for its consideration, prior to presentation to any other person or company, any suitable opportunity to acquire an operating business, until the earlier of the consummation by the Company of a Business Combination or the liquidation of the Company, subject to any pre-existing fiduciary obligations the Initial Shareholders might have.

  • Reportable Events Involving the ▇▇▇▇▇ Law Notwithstanding the reporting requirements outlined above, any Reportable Event that involves solely a probable violation of section 1877 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §1395nn (the ▇▇▇▇▇ Law) should be submitted by Practitioner to CMS through the self-referral disclosure protocol (SRDP), with a copy to the OIG. If Practitioner identifies a probable violation of the ▇▇▇▇▇ Law and repays the applicable Overpayment directly to the CMS contractor, then Practitioner is not required by this Section III.G to submit the Reportable Event to CMS through the SRDP.