Noise Study Report Sample Clauses

Noise Study Report. The Noise Study Report (NSR) for this project was prepared by ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ on June 18, 2020 and approved by ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ on June 18, 2020. The purpose of this NSR is to evaluate noise impacts and abatement, if necessary, under the requirements of Title 23, Part 772, of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Procedures for Abatement of Highway Traffic Noise, related to the SR 70 Binney Junction Roadway Rehabilitation and Complete Streets Project. According to 23 CFR 772.3, all highway projects developed in conformance with this regulation are deemed to be in conformance with FHWA noise standards. Compliance with 23 CFR 772 provides compliance with the noise impact assessment requirements of NEPA. Future traffic noise levels under design-year build conditions are predicted to approach or exceed the noise abatement criteria (NAC) at outdoor areas of frequent human use associated with Activity Category B and Activity Category C land uses in the project area. As such, traffic noise impacts are predicted to occur due to operation of this project, and noise abatement was considered for four areas where noise impacts were predicted to occur under future build conditions. These four areas include: • Ellis Lake Park • B Street/Lakeside Court – Three Residential Area • B Street/18th Street – Marysville High School and Youth Center • Cemetery Road – Marysville Cemetery At residential land uses where noise levels were predicted to approach or exceed the NAC for Activity Category B land use, noise barriers were not found to be feasible due to driveway and sidewalk access requirements along B Street. At locations associated with the cemetery, two parks, Marysville High School, and the youth center where noise levels at outdoor areas were predicted to approach or exceed the NAC for Activity Category C land use, the areas that would be affected were not considered or assumed to be areas of frequent outdoor use. Because of these factors, noise abatement was not evaluated further. No adverse noise impacts from construction are anticipated. Construction would be conducted in accordance with Caltrans provisions in Section 14-8.02, Noise Control, of the 2018 Standard Specifications and applicable local noise standards. Furthermore, implementing the measures specified in Chapter 8, “Construction Noise,” would minimize temporary noise impacts from construction. See Attachment J, Noise Study Report, for more information. The Railroad Noise and Vibration Technical Report for this pr...
View SourceView Similar (3)
Noise Study Report. TAHA will prepare a Noise Study consistent with the Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (April 2020). This process will begin with the preparation of a Work Plan to be approved by Caltrans. The Work Plan will identify traffic data, sensitive receptors (e.g., residences), noise monitoring locations, and methodology. The scope includes a series of short-term 20-minute measurements and up to two long- term 24-hour measurements. Construction noise will be assessed based on maximum equipment levels and frequency of occurrence near sensitive receptors. The noise levels will consider construction phase, engine type (diesel or gasoline), horsepower, load factor, and percentage of time in use. The construction section will discuss Caltrans Standard Specifications and local noise regulations. If necessary, avoidance and/or mitigation measures will be included to minimize or eliminate adverse construction noise impacts. Changes in operational noise levels will be assessed using Traffic Noise Model (TNM). The baseline noise condition will be estimated using traffic counts and speed information obtained during monitoring activities. No Build and Build Alternatives will be modeled using traffic conditions that generate the highest noise levels, vehicle mix, speed, and roadway configuration. The roadway configuration will be precisely based on engineering drawings. Noise abatement measures (soundwalls) will be evaluated based on benefits to receptors, acoustical feasibility, and reasonableness allowances. The Work Plan will set the framework for the analysis and minimize the potential for complications. ▇▇▇▇ will use the Work Plan to coordinate extensively with Caltrans staff to discuss and quickly resolve complications. As part of this task, ▇▇▇▇ will prepare a Draft Noise Abatement Decision Report (NADR) using information from the Noise Study Report, other relevant environmental studies, and design considerations. The NADR will include: • Noise abatement reasonableness allowances presented in the Noise Study Report. • Acoustical feasibility of noise abatement presented in the Noise Study Report. • Locations and dimensions of evaluated noise barriers. • Approved cost estimates of acoustically feasible noise abatement. • Non-acoustical feasibility issues of proposed noise abatement based on the best available design information available. • Effects of abatement, including effects on cultural resources, scenic views, hazardous materials, biological resources, and oth...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Noise Study Report. LSA will re-conduct noise level measurements to calibrate the FHWA’s Traffic Noise Model (TNM) Version 2.5 and update the NSR to evaluate the Design Variations to identify traffic noise impacts and abatement measures using the FHWA’s TNM Version 2.5. Noise abatement measures (noise barriers) designed to reduce long-term traffic noise impacts by 5 A-weighted decibels (dBA) or more, as required to be feasible, will be evaluated. The total reasonable allowance will be recalculated using the most recent cost allowance for each noise barrier. The remaining Caltrans review comments on the Draft NSR may need to be addressed. ⮚ Noise level measurements will be re-conducted to calibration the FHWA TNM version 2.5.
View Source
Noise Study Report. A Noise Study Report (NSR) will be updated to address the trips associated with the movement of import material from the mandatory borrow site.
View Source
Noise Study Report. CONSULTANT will address issues related to the traffic noise impact for use in the Environmental Document. A Noise Study Report (NSR) will be updated to analyze two
View Source

Related to Noise Study Report

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Feasibility Study Buyer is granted the right to conduct engineering and/or market and economic feasibility studies of the Property and a physical inspection of the Property, including studies or inspections to determine the existence of any environmental hazards or conditions (collectively, the “Feasibility Study”) during the period (the “Feasibility Period”) commencing on the Effective Date and ending at 5:00 p.m., Central Time, on the June 3, 2010. With Seller’s permission, after Seller has received advance notice sufficient to permit it to schedule in an orderly manner Buyer’s examination of the Property and to provide at least 24-hours’ advance written notice to any affected tenants, Buyer or its designated agents may enter upon the Property during normal business hours for purposes of analysis or other tests and inspections which may be deemed necessary by Buyer for the Feasibility Study. Buyer or its designated representative must be accompanied by a designated representative of Seller or have received Seller’s written permission prior to entering upon the Property in connection with Buyer’s Feasibility Study; provided, however, Buyer may not enter into any space leased by any tenant without being accompanied by a designated representative of Seller. Seller agrees to make its representative reasonably available during normal business hours. Buyer will not alter the physical condition of the Property or conduct invasive testing without notifying Seller of its requested tests, and obtaining the written consent of Seller to any physical alteration of the Property or invasive testing. Buyer will utilize commercially reasonable diligence to conduct or cause to be conducted all inspections and tests in a manner and at times which will not unreasonably interfere with any tenant’s use and occupancy of the Property. If Buyer determines, in its sole judgment, that the Property is not suitable for any reason for Buyer’s intended use or purpose, or is not in satisfactory condition, then Buyer may terminate this Contract by written notice to Seller prior to expiration of the Feasibility Period, in which case the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Money (other than the Option Money) will be returned to Buyer, and neither party shall have any further right or obligation hereunder other than as set forth herein with respect to rights or obligations which survive termination. If this Contract is not terminated pursuant to this Section 5(a), then after expiration of the Feasibility Period, after Seller has received advance notice sufficient to permit it to schedule in an orderly manner Buyer’s examination of the Property and to provide at least 24-hours’ advance written notice to any affected tenants, Buyer or its designated agents may enter upon the Property during normal business hours. Buyer or its designated representative must be accompanied by a designated representative of Seller or have received Seller’s written permission prior to entering upon the Property; provided, however, Buyer may not enter into any space leased by any tenant without being accompanied by a designated representative of Seller. If this Contract is not timely terminated pursuant to this Section 5(a), Buyer’s right to terminate this Contract pursuant to this Section 5(a) and any and all objections with respect to the Feasibility Study will be deemed to have been waived by Buyer for all purposes.

  • Protocol The attached Protocol shall be an integral part of this Agreement.

  • Progress Report By March 1 of each year, ***** will submit a written annual report to Stanford covering the preceding calendar year. The report will include information sufficient to enable Stanford to satisfy reporting requirements of the U.S. Government and for Stanford to ascertain progress by ***** toward meeting this Agreement’s diligence requirements. Each report will describe, where relevant: *****’s progress toward commercialization of Licensed Product, including work completed, key scientific discoveries, summary of work-in-progress, current schedule of anticipated events or milestones, market plans for introduction of Licensed Product, and significant corporate transactions involving Licensed Product. ***** will specifically describe how each Licensed Product is related to each Licensed Patent.

  • Study Population ‌ Infants who underwent creation of an enterostomy receiving postoperative care and awaiting enterostomy closure: to be assessed for eligibility: n = 201 to be assigned to the study: n = 106 to be analysed: n = 106 Duration of intervention per patient of the intervention group: 6 weeks between enterostomy creation and enterostomy closure Follow-up per patient: 3 months, 6 months and 12 months post enterostomy closure, following enterostomy closure (12-month follow-up only applicable for patients that are recruited early enough to complete this follow-up within the 48 month of overall study duration).