Non-Assertion by Third Parties Sample Clauses

Non-Assertion by Third Parties. To Allos’ Knowledge, no Third Party has asserted in writing that the issued patents within the Allos Patents set forth in Schedule 1 are invalid or unenforceable in the Licensed Territory or the Allos Territory;
Non-Assertion by Third Parties. To Inovio’s actual knowledge, no Third Party has asserted in writing that the issued patents within the Inovio Licensed Patents set forth in Exhibit A are invalid or unenforceable;
Non-Assertion by Third Parties. No Third Party has asserted, or threatened, in writing, legal action asserting, that the Licensor Patents are invalid or unenforceable;
Non-Assertion by Third Parties. [***], (i) to Spruce’s knowledge, no Third Party has asserted in writing that the Upstream Patents are invalid or unenforceable and (ii) no Third Party has asserted in writing that any other issued patents within the Spruce Licensed Patents set forth in Exhibit A are invalid or unenforceable;
Non-Assertion by Third Parties. To HBM Alpha’s Knowledge, no Third Party has asserted in writing that the issued Patents within the Licensed Patents set forth in Schedule 1.56 are invalid or unenforceable;
Non-Assertion by Third Parties. No Third Party has asserted or threatened in writing legal action asserting, that the SIGA Patents or the SIGA Trademarks are invalid or unenforceable by challenging or threatening to challenge the inventorship, ownership, SIGA’s right to use, scope, validity or enforceability of any SIGA Patent (including by way of example, through the institution or written threat of institution of interference, derivation, post-grant review, opposition, nullity or similar invalidity proceedings before any Governmental Authority);
Non-Assertion by Third Parties. No Third Party has asserted in writing that the issued patents within the Apollomics Licensed Patents are invalid or unenforceable;
Non-Assertion by Third Parties. No Third Party has asserted in writing, or to Licensor’s actual knowledge, threatened legal action asserting, that the Licensor Patents are invalid or unenforceable; (e)No Proceeding. There are no pending, and to Licensor’s actual knowledge, no threatened, adverse actions, claims, investigations, suits or proceedings against Licensor or any of its Affiliates, at Law or in equity, or before or by any Governmental Authority, involving the Technology, the Development Candidates or the Products, nor to Licensor’s actual knowledge has any such adverse action, claim, investigation, suit or proceeding been brought or threatened since the inception of Licensor as a company, in each case, which has been resolved in a manner that materially adversely impairs any of Licensor’s rights in and to any such Technology or to the Development Candidates or the Products; (f)
Non-Assertion by Third Parties. To GlycoMimetics’ knowledge, no Third Party has asserted in writing (i) that the issued patents within the GlycoMimetics Licensed Patents set forth in Exhibit A are invalid, unregisterable, or unenforceable or (ii) the misuse or non-infringement of such Patents;
Non-Assertion by Third Parties. To Synergy’s knowledge, no Third Party has asserted that the issued patents within the Synergy Licensed Patents set forth in Exhibit A are invalid or unenforceable;