Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Sample Clauses

Nonpoint Source Pollution Control. Ecology EPA
View SourceView Similar (2)
Nonpoint Source Pollution Control. 1. Nonpoint Management Plan The State of Washington will update its statewide Nonpoint Source (NPS) Management Plan and submit it to EPA by August 31, 1999. The program will address the nine key elements and the CZARA (Coastal Zone Act Reauthorization Amendments) management measures. The plan will be approved or disapproved by EPA within 30 days of submittal. Implementation of the plan should provide the blueprint for expenditure of future 319 funds. EPA will assist the state in meeting the federal consistency requirements of the program. The state will provide an annual report including project descriptions to EPA on or before July 1 of each year summarizing implementation activities associated with the approved Nonpoint Source Management Plan.‌
View Source
Nonpoint Source Pollution Control. Contractor shall perform the Work in a manner which shall not allow harmful pollutants to enter the City storm drain system. To ensure compliance, the Contractor shall implement the appropriate Best Management Practice (BMP) as outlined in the brochures entitled "Best Management Practice for the Construction Industry" issued by the Santa ▇▇▇▇▇ Valley Non-point Source Pollution Control Program to suit the construction site and job condition. The Contractor shall present his or her proposed BMP at the Pre-construction Meeting for discussion and approval. Compensation for compliance with this provision shall be considered as included in the prices paid for the contract items of work provided in this contract, and no additional compensation will be allowed. 1.0 Mobilization 1 LS $ $ 2.0 Construction Area Signs & Traffic Control 1 LS $ $ 3.0 Type II Slurry Seal 230,000 SY $ $ 4.0 Asphalt Failure Repair (Deeplift) 1,470 TON $ $ 5.0 Thermoplastic Striping & Markings 5.1 Detail 1 – Yellow Centerline 1,000 LF $ $ 5.2 Detail 22 – Double Yellow Centerline 10,400 LF $ $ 5.3 Detail 25 – Left Edge Line 1,300 LF $ $ 5.4 Detail 27B – Right Edge Line 13,400 LF $ $ 5.5 Detail 32 – Two-Way Left Turn Lane 1,030 LF $ $ 5.6 Detail 38 – Channelizing Line 865 LF $ $ 5.7 T-markers for On-Street Parking 100 LF $ $ 5.8 12" White (for crosswalk/limit lines) 3,500 SF $ $ 5.9 12" Yellow (for crosswalk/limit lines) 200 SF $ $ 5.10 24” White Line (for crosswalk 1,470 LF $ $ 5.11 24” Yellow Line 210 LF $ $ 5.12 Yield Line 150 SF $ $ 5.13 Type I Straight Arrow 14 SF $ $ 5.14 Type IV (Left or Right) Arrows 270 SF $ $ 5.15 "25" Numeral 405 SF $ $ 5.16 Bike Loop Detector Symbol 4 SF $ $ 5.17 Shared Lane Bicycle Marking (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇) 620 SF $ $ 5.18 "STOP" Word 2,046 SF $ $ 5.19 "YIELD" Word 192 SF $ $ 5.20 "SLOW" Word 92 SF $ $ 5.21 "SCHOOL" Word 140 SF $ $ 5.22 “XING” Word 84 SF $ $
View Source
Nonpoint Source Pollution Control an annual end-of-year report by April 1 of each year and EPA will review and provide a satisfactory progress determination to Ecology at or before awarding the CWA 319 grant. EPA will use these reports as the basis for determining continued eligibility for future CWA Section 319 grants. 1B. Ecology and EPA will submit and award the CWA Section 319 grant on a biennial basis rather than an annual basis. For the years in which Ecology applies for the grant, Ecology will submit a grant proposal no later than March 31 and EPA will process the grant and provide funding no later than July 1 of that same year. 1C. Ecology will submit semi-annual CWA Section 319 grant progress reports by August 31 and March 1 of each year which cover the previous half of the state fiscal year. 1D. Ecology and EPA will continue to participate on Forests and Fish committees and workgroups, particularly the Policy Committee and the Cooperative Monitoring, Evaluation and Research Committee. Ecology and EPA will continue to work with Washington State Department of Natural Resources and other agencies to ensure forest practices rules are implemented to comply with the habitat conservation plan and with state water quality standards and the Clean Water Act. 1E. Ecology will enter all past year 319 project data, including load reduction estimates as applicable into the Grants Reporting and Tracking System. All data for funded projects will be entered no later than April 1st each year. Yearly load reduction data is due February 15th each year. (EPA Program Activity Measure (▇▇▇) WQ-9) 1F. Ecology will report in the 2011 and 2012 Nonpoint Source annual reports the number of watershed-based plans, supported under the State Nonpoint Source Management Program since the beginning of FY 2002 that have been substantially implemented. Ecology will provide water miles/acres covered. 1G. Ecology will continue to work with EPA to complete at least two success stories per year. The stories will show progress toward or achievement of water quality standards under EPA ▇▇▇ WQ-10 guidance, as a result of Nonpoint Source (NPS) implementation measures. These success measures will be housed on Ecology’s website so that Ecology can keep them up to date. 1H. Ecology will coordinate with EPA on the nonpoint plan during its development. Ecology will submit the State Nonpoint Plan by June 2015. 1I. EPA will actively support Ecology as it prepares and issues its nonpoint strategy. EPA will make sure that their stra...
View Source
Nonpoint Source Pollution Control. 1. The Grantee certifies that the Project shall sustain water quality benefits for twenty (20) years. 2. The Grantee certifies it is providing a match of at least 20% (for projects from $1,000,000 to $5,000,000), 15% (for projects from $125,000 to $999,999), or 10% (for projects less than $125,000) of the capital costs to be spent on this Project, as such costs are defined under Public Resources Code section 32025. 3. Notwithstanding Exhibits A and B, the Grantee shall submit to the Grant Manager a monitoring and reporting plan that does all of the following: a. Identifies one or more nonpoint sources of pollution. b. Describes the baseline water quality of the waterbody impacted. c. Describes the manner in which the proposed best management practices or management measures are implemented. d. Determines the effectiveness of the proposed best management practices or management measures in preventing or reducing pollution. 4. The Grantee certifies that this Project has not received any funds from the Proposition 13 Coastal Nonpoint Source Control Program. (Wat. Code, § 79148 et seq.) The Grantee further certifies that it will not apply for and hereby withdraws any outstanding applications for funds from the Proposition 13 Coastal Nonpoint Source Control Program for this Project, including any future phases of the Project.
View Source
Nonpoint Source Pollution Control. EPA will work with NRCS and Ecology’s Water Quality Program to design a simple process to collaborate on the NWQI watershed selection and on the 590 practice.  Total Ecology FTEs: X  Ecology FTEs funded by PPG: X  Activities funded by PPG: 1A through 1I, 1K
View Source

Related to Nonpoint Source Pollution Control

  • Contractor’s Pollution Liability insurance covering losses caused by pollution conditions that arise from the operations of the Contractor. Contractors Pollution Liability insurance shall be written in an amount of at least $1,000,000 per loss, with an annual aggregate of at least $1,000,000. Contractors Pollution Liability shall cover bodily injury, property damage, cleanup costs and defense including costs and expenses incurred in the investigation, defense, or settlement of claims. If the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance is written on a claims-made basis, the Contractor warrants that any retroactive date applicable to coverage under the policy precedes the effective date of this contract; and that continuous coverage will be maintained or an extended discovery period will be exercised for a period of three (3) years beginning from the time that work under the contract is completed. The City shall be named by endorsement as an additional insured on the Contractors Pollution Liability insurance policy. If the scope of services as defined in this contract includes the disposal of any hazardous materials from the job site, the Contractor must furnish to the City evidence of Pollution Liability insurance maintained by the disposal site operator for losses arising from the insured facility accepting waste under this contract. Coverage certified to the Public Entity under this paragraph must be maintained in minimum amounts of $1,000,000 per loss, with an annual aggregate of at least $1,000,000. Pollution Liability coverage at least as broad as that provided under ISO Pollution Liability- Broadened Coverage for Covered Autos Endorsement CA 99 48 shall be provided, and the Motor Carrier Act Endorsement (MCS 90) shall be attached.

  • Pollution Control The Employer and the Union agree to limit all forms of environmental pollution.

  • Pollution Liability Contractors shall provide proof of pollution liability insurance arising out of all operations of the Contractors and subcontractors, due to discharge, dispersal, release, or escape of contaminants or pollutants into or upon land, the atmosphere or any watercourse or body of water with bodily injury and property damage limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 annual aggregate for: 1) Bodily injury, sickness, disease, mental anguish or shock sustained by any person, including death; 2) Property damage including physical injury to or destruction of tangible property including the resulting loss of use thereof, clean-up costs, and the loss of use of tangible property that has not been physically injured or destroyed; 3) Defense including loss adjustment costs, charges and expenses incurred in the investigation, adjustment or defense of claims for such compensatory damages; 4) Definition of pollution conditions shall include asbestos, lead, and mold so that these risks are covered if caused by Contractor/successful candidate’s work or operations. 5) Coverage is required on an occurrence form.

  • Environmental Services a. Preparation of Environmental Documentation (CEQA/NEPA) including but not limited to the following: a. Initial Study b. Categorical Exemption (“CE”) c. Notice of Exemption (“▇▇▇”) d. Negative Declaration (“ND”) e. Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) f. Notice of Preparation (“NOP”) g. Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) 1. Initial Document (Screen Check/Administrative Draft) 2. Addendum 3.Supplemental 4.Subsequent 5.Programmatic 6.Project h. Notice of Completion (“NOC”) i. Notice of Availability (“NOA”) j. Notice of Determination (“NOD”) k. Notice of Intent (“NOI”) l. Notices for public meetings and hearings m. Finding of No Significant Impact (“FONSI”) n. Environmental Assessment (“EA”) o. Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”) p. Preliminary Environmental Study Form (“PES”) q. Preliminary Environmental Analysis Report (“PEAR”) r. Response to Comments s. Mitigation Monitoring Program t. Facts and Findings and Statement of Overriding Consideration