Nonstandard Agreements Clause Samples

Nonstandard Agreements. 1. An Agreement Review Transmittal form is added to the database by the agreement writer. The region prepares the nonstandard PE Agreement and electronically (by email attachment) submits the documents to HQ Utilities for review using level-playing-field software such as, but not limited to, MS Word, MS Excel, and, for scanned Exhibit C plans, Adobe PDF files. 2. HQ Utilities reviews the agreement and secures approval as to form from the Attorney General’s Office for nonstandard agreements. The review includes, but is not limited to: • Inclusion of necessary documents: cost sheet, plan sheet, scope of work, Memorandums of Understanding (MOUs), Letters of Understanding (LOUs), and other documents mentioned in the body of the agreement. • Engineering issues: location of facility (vertical and horizontal), crossing locations, access breaks, material quantities, easements, and quantities. • Compliance with the Utilities Accommodation Policy. • Financial accuracy: materials, quantities, unit costs, hourly rates, benefits, travel costs, overhead rates, and calculations. Be sure the appropriate percentages are applied for engineering, contingencies, mobilization, and sales tax. 3. The HQ Design Office obtains FHWA review/approval for all nonstandard PE Agreements for projects on the Interstate System.
View Source
Nonstandard Agreements. E-mail a copy of the agreement to HQ Utilities for Headquarters review and concurrence. FHWA may need to review for an Interstate Agreement. After successful review by all interested parties, and an approval as to form by the Attorney General’s Office, HQ Utilities will send a signed original back to the region. For approval and execution of the agreement, follow the procedure as outlined under Standard Form Agreement: No Interstate Issues (above).
View Source

Related to Nonstandard Agreements

  • Award Agreements Each SAR grant shall be evidenced by an Award Agreement in such form as the Committee may approve and shall contain such terms and conditions not inconsistent with other provisions of the Plan as shall be determined from time to time by the Committee.

  • Modifications to the Award Agreement This Award Agreement constitutes the entire understanding of the parties on the subjects covered. Participant expressly warrants that he or she is not accepting this Award Agreement in reliance on any promises, representations, or inducements other than those contained herein. Modifications to this Award Agreement or the Plan can be made only in an express written contract executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Plan or this Award Agreement, the Company reserves the right to revise this Award Agreement as it deems necessary or advisable, in its sole discretion and without the consent of Participant, to comply with Section 409A or to otherwise avoid imposition of any additional tax or income recognition under Section 409A in connection to this Award of Restricted Stock Units.

  • Stock Option Agreement Each grant of an Option under the Plan shall be evidenced by a Stock Option Agreement between the Optionee and the Company. Such Option shall be subject to all applicable terms of the Plan and may be subject to any other terms that are not inconsistent with the Plan. The Stock Option Agreement shall specify whether the Option is an ISO or an NSO. The provisions of the various Stock Option Agreements entered into under the Plan need not be identical. Options may be granted in consideration of a reduction in the Optionee’s other compensation.

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Consultants’ Services 1. Quality- and Cost-based Selection. Except as otherwise provided in paragraph 2 below, consultants’ services shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of Quality and Cost-based Selection.

  • Other Methods of Procurement of Consultants’ Services The following table specifies the methods of procurement, other than Quality and Cost-based Selection, which may be used for consultants’ services. The Procurement Plan shall specify the circumstances under which such methods may be used. (a) Quality-based Selection (b) Selection under a Fixed Budget