Common use of Notices of Violation Clause in Contracts

Notices of Violation. On June 7, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Target Corporation and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. Designco was subsequently identified as the manufacturer/supplier of the Products. On September 12, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Designco and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. No public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the Notices.

Notices of Violation. On June 7July 24, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Target Corporation At Home Stores LLC, and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the alleged health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. Designco Sino Gifts was subsequently identified as the manufacturer/supplier of the Products. On September 12October 10, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Designco Sino Gifts and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the alleged health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. No public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the Notices.

Notices of Violation. On June 7April 26, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Target Dollar General Corporation and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. Designco Shandong Glassware was subsequently identified as the manufacturer/supplier of the Products. On September 1227, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Designco Shandong Glassware and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. No public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the Notices.

Notices of Violation. On June 7August 2, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Target Corporation and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. Designco Formation Creative was subsequently identified as the manufacturer/supplier of the Products. On September 12, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Designco Formation Creative and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. No public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the Notices.

Notices of Violation. On June 7July 12, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Target Corporation Walmart Inc. and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. Designco Ningbo Zhenda was subsequently identified as the manufacturer/supplier of the Products. On September 12February 4, 20242025, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Designco ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. No public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the Notices.

Notices of Violation. On June 7August 16, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Target Corporation and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. Designco Howin Trading was subsequently identified as the manufacturer/supplier of the Products. On September 1227, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Designco Howin Trading and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. No public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the Notices.

Notices of Violation. On June 7August 2, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Target Corporation ▇▇▇▇ Stores, Inc. and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients recipient violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. Designco Indian Village was subsequently identified as the manufacturer/supplier of the Productsproducts. On September 1227, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Designco Indian Village and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. No public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the Notices.

Notices of Violation. On June 7July 12, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Target Corporation At Home Stores LLC and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. Designco Viition was subsequently identified as the manufacturer/supplier of the Productsproduct. On September 12August 2, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Designco Viition and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. No public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the Notices.

Notices of Violation. On June 7August 16, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Target Corporation ▇▇▇▇’▇, Inc. and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. Designco Casa Collective was subsequently identified as the manufacturer/supplier of the Products. On September 12, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Designco Casa Collective, and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. No public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the Notices.

Notices of Violation. On June 7April 26, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Target Corporation and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. Designco Shandong Excel was subsequently identified as the manufacturer/supplier of the Products. On September 12June 7, 2024, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ served Designco Shandong Excel and the requisite public enforcement agencies with a 60-Day Notice of Violation, alleging that the notice recipients violated Proposition 65 by failing to warn customers and consumers in California of the health hazards associated with exposures to lead from the Products. No public enforcer has commenced and is diligently prosecuting the allegations set forth in the Notices.