Number of Reviews Sample Clauses

The "Number of Reviews" clause sets a specific limit or requirement on how many times a party can review or request revisions to a deliverable or document. In practice, this clause might state that a client is entitled to two rounds of feedback on a draft report, after which any further changes may incur additional fees or require separate agreement. Its core function is to manage expectations and prevent excessive or indefinite revision cycles, thereby ensuring efficiency and clarity in the review process.
Number of Reviews. Franchisee shall conduct a sufficient number of compliance reviews, hauler route reviews, and inspections of Generators, to adequately determine the Generators’ overall compliance with SB 1383 Regulations, AB 1826, AB 341, and Chapter 14 of the City Code. The City reserves the right to specify the total number of compliance reviews, the type and timeframe, and to require additional inspections if the City determines that the amount of inspections conducted by the Franchisee is insufficient. The City may require the Franchisee to prioritize inspections of entities that the City determines are more likely to be out of compliance.
View Source
Number of Reviews. The Contractor shall conduct a sufficient number of 1547 Collector Route reviews and inspections of Generators to adequately determine 1548 the Generators’ overall compliance with SB 1383 Regulations, and Sections 5- 1549 2985 and 5-2986 of the County Code. County reserves the right to require 1550 additional inspections, if the County determines that the amount of inspections 1551 conducted by the Contractor is insufficient. County may require the Contractor to 1552 prioritize inspections of entities that the County determines are more likely to be 1553 out of compliance. 1554 2. Non-Compliant Entities. Contractor shall provide educational materials in 1555 response to violations to the non-compliant Customers and Generators within 1556 ten (10) days of determination of non-compliance or immediately upon 1557 determination of non-compliance if such non-compliance is determined during an 1558 inspection or Collector Route review. Contractor shall document the non- 1559 compliant Customers and Generators and the date and type of education 1560 materials provided, and shall report such information to the County in accordance 1561 with Exhibit D. The County shall be responsible for subsequent enforcement 1562 action against the Generators.
View Source
Number of Reviews. Midland CD-100% 1 Garland Crime Lab CD- 100% 2 Amarillo Crime Lab CD-100% (updated) 1 Austin- Building A HVAC GMP- 55% and CD- 100% 3 Austin - Building A Museum GMP- 55% and CD- 100% 3 Austin - Building C CD-100% 2 Austin- Northwest Building GMP- 55% and CD- 100% 3 Lubbock DD- 35%, GMP- 55% and CD- 100% 4 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇- 35%, GMP- 55% and CD- 100% 4 ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇- 35%, GMP- 55% and CD- 100% 4 ▇▇▇▇▇ - CID Area and HVAC GMP- 55% and CD- 100% 3 Conroe DD- 35%, GMP- 55% and CD- 100% 4 San Angelo DD- 35%, GMP- 55% and CD- 100% 4 Abilene DD- 35%, GMP- 55% and CD- 100% 4 El Paso DD- 35%, GMP- 55% and CD- 100% 4 Corpus Christi DD- 35%, GMP- 55% and CD- 100% 4 Garland- Generator GMP- 55% and CD- 100% 3
View Source
Number of Reviews. The Contractor shall conduct a sufficient number of compliance reviews, Contractor route reviews, and inspections of entities described in this Section, to adequately determine the entities’ overall compliance with SB 1383, AB 1826, and AB 341. The City may require additional inspections, if the City determines that the amount of inspections conducted by the Contractor is insufficient. City may require the Contractor to prioritize inspections of entities that the City determines are more likely to be out of compliance.
View Source
Number of Reviews per Reviewer 3. 2.1 Care should be taken not to overload any reviewer in an establishment before commencing the review process.
View Source

Related to Number of Reviews

  • Number of Stewards The Union may designate one (1), but no more than one (1), ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ on each shift for each of the Employer's principal work areas from among those employees who work therein.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to February 28th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • Performance Reviews Supplier will perform a minimum of one review with Sourcewell per agreement year. The review will cover transactions to Participating Entities, pricing and terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply chain issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.