Objection Right for Sub-Processors Sample Clauses

The Objection Right for Sub-processors clause grants one party, typically the data controller, the ability to object to the appointment or replacement of sub-processors by the data processor. In practice, this means that before a processor engages a new sub-processor to handle personal data, they must notify the controller, who then has a specified period to raise any objections based on legitimate grounds such as data security or compliance concerns. This clause serves to protect the controller’s interests by ensuring oversight and control over which third parties may access or process sensitive data, thereby mitigating risks related to data privacy and regulatory compliance.
Objection Right for Sub-Processors. Wiz offers a mechanism for Customers to subscribe to notifications of changes to Wiz’s Sub- Processor List via ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇/sub-processor-list. If Customer subscribes to receive such updates, Wiz shall provide notification of any intended changes concerning the addition or replacement of other Sub-Processor(s) to the email address which has subscribed thereby giving Customer the opportunity to object. Customer may reasonably object to ▇▇▇’s use of a Sub-Processor for reasons related to the Data Protection Laws by notifying Wiz in writing within ten (10) days after receipt of Wiz’s notice including the reasons for objecting to Wiz’s use of such Sub-Processor. Failure to object to such Sub-Processor in writing within ten (10) days following Wiz’s notice shall be deemed as acceptance of the Sub-Processor. In the event Customer reasonably objects to a Sub-Processor, Wiz will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services to avoid Processing of Customer Personal Data by the objected-to Sub-Processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Wiz is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Customer may, as a sole remedy, terminate the Agreement and this DPA by providing written notice to Wiz provided that all amounts due under the Agreement before the termination date shall be duly paid to Wiz. Until a decision is made regarding the Sub-Processor, Wiz may temporarily suspend the Processing of the affected Customer Personal Data.
View SourceView Similar (8)
Objection Right for Sub-Processors. Customer may reasonably object to Strigo's use of a certain Sub-processor (e.g., if making Personal Data available to the Sub-processor may violate applicable Data Protection Law or weaken the protections for such Personal Data) by notifying Strigo promptly in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of Strigo's notice in connection therewith. Such notice shall explain the reasonable grounds for the objection. In the event Customer objects to a new Sub-processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, Strigo will use commercially reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer's configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening Customer. If Strigo is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, either party may terminate without penalty the applicable Order Form(s) with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Strigo without the use of the objected-to new Sub-processor by providing written notice to Strigo. Strigo will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Order Form(s) following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
View Source
Objection Right for Sub-Processors. Client may object to Anacle’s use of a Sub-processor by notifying Anacle in writing. If Client objects to a Sub-processor as permitted in the preceding sentence, Anacle will use reasonable efforts to make available to Client a change in the SaaS Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Client’s configuration or use of the SaaS Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to Sub- processor without unreasonably burdening Client. If Anacle is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed sixty (60) days, Client may terminate the applicable Order Form(s) with respect only to those SaaS Services which cannot be provided by Anacle without the use of the objected-to Sub-processor by providing written notice to Anacle. Anacle will refund Client any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Order Form(s) following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated SaaS Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Client.
View Source
Objection Right for Sub-Processors. Client may reasonably object to Dazz’s use of alternative Sub-processor for reasons related to the GDPR by notifying Dazz promptly in writing within three
View Source
Objection Right for Sub-Processors. If Customer has a reasonable basis to object to Project Agora’s use of a specific Sub-processor, Customer shall notify Project Agora in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of Project Agora’s notice of engagement of said Sub-processor in the Services. In the event Customer objects to the engagement of a Sub- processor and that objection is reasonable and based on specific concerns, Project Agora will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the affected Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the affected Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to Sub-processor. If Project Agora is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed ninety (90) days, Customer may terminate the applicable Order Form(s) in respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by Project Agora without the use of the objected-to Sub-processor, by providing written notice to Project Agora.
View Source
Objection Right for Sub-Processors. Customer may object to ODASEVA’s use of a new Sub processor by notifying ODASEVA promptly in writing within ten (10) business days after receipt of ODASEVA’s notice in accordance with the mechanism set out in Section 5.2 (“ Information Regarding Current and/or New Sub-processors”). In the event Customer objects to a new Sub- processor, as permitted in the preceding sentence, ODASEVA will use reasonable efforts to make available to Customer a change in the Services or recommend a commercially reasonable change to Customer’s configuration or use of the Services to avoid Processing of Personal Data by the objected-to new Sub-processor without unreasonably burdening the Customer. If ODASEVA is unable to make available such change within a reasonable period of time, which shall not exceed thirty (30) days, Customer may terminate the applicable Order Form(s) with respect only to those Services which cannot be provided by ODASEVA without the use of the objected-to new Sub- processor by providing written notice to ODASEVA. ODASEVA will refund Customer any prepaid fees covering the remainder of the term of such Order Form(s) following the effective date of termination with respect to such terminated Services, without imposing a penalty for such termination on Customer.
View Source

Related to Objection Right for Sub-Processors

  • License to Customer Vendor grants to Customer, a perpetual, irrevocable, royalty free license, solely for the Customer’s internal business purposes, to use, copy, modify, display, perform (by any means), transmit and prepare derivative works of any Vendor IP embodied in or delivered to Customer in conjunction with the Work Product. The foregoing license includes the right to sublicense third parties, solely for the purpose of engaging such third parties to assist or carryout Customer’s internal business use of the Work Product. Except for the preceding license, all rights in Vendor IP remain in Vendor.

  • Sub-processors 7.1 bookinglab shall not subcontract any processing of the Customer Personal Data to any Sub-Processor except as authorised by the Customer in accordance with this paragraph 7. The Customer consents to bookinglab engaging Sub-Processors to process the Data provided that: (i) bookinglab provides at least 30 days' prior notice of the addition of any subcontractor (including details of the processing it performs or will perform) (“Sub-Processor Notice”); and (ii) bookinglab complies with paragraphs 7.4 and 7.5 of this Appendix. 7.2 The Customer hereby consents to bookinglab’s use of the Sub-Processors listed at ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇ which shall be maintained and updated when any Sub-Processor is added or removed in accordance with this paragraph 7. 7.3 If within 30 days of receipt of a Sub-Processor Notice the Customer notifies bookinglab in writing of its refusal to consent to bookinglab’s appointment of a Sub-Processor on reasonable grounds relating to the protection of Customer Personal Data, then either: (i) bookinglab will not appoint the Sub-Processor; or (ii) if bookinglab does appoint the Sub-Processor, the Customer may elect to terminate the Agreement without penalty or cost to either party save that any portion of the fees paid in advance in respect of Services not yet delivered as at the effective date of termination shall be refunded to the Customer. If after 30 days from receipt of the Sub-Processor Notice the Customer has not indicated its refusal of the appointment of a Sub-Processor in accordance with this paragraph, then the Customer is deemed to have given its consent and bookinglab shall be entitled to appoint the relevant Sub-Processor with immediate effect. 7.4 If bookinglab appoints a Sub-Processor, bookinglab shall ensure that: (a) such Sub-Processor shall only process Customer Personal Data in order to perform one or more of bookinglab's obligations under this Agreement; and (b) it enters into a written agreement or other legally enforceable terms with that Sub-Processor prior to any processing by the Sub-Processor, requiring the Sub-Processor to: (i) process Customer Personal Data only in accordance with the written instructions of bookinglab or the Customer; and (ii) comply with data protection obligations equivalent in all material respects to those imposed on bookinglab under this Appendix. 7.5 Notwithstanding the appointment of a Sub-Processor, bookinglab is responsible and liable to the Customer for any processing by the Sub-Processor in breach of this Appendix.

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract. a. The contractor shall notify all potential subcontractors and suppliers and lessors of their EEO obligations under this contract. b. The contractor will use good faith efforts to ensure subcontractor compliance with their EEO obligations.

  • Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment In all solicitations either by competitive bidding or negotiation made by the Local Government for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential subcontractor or supplier will be notified by the Local Government of the Local Government’s obligations under this Agreement and the Acts and Regulations relative to Nondiscrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.