OBJECTIVES and WORKPLAN Sample Clauses

OBJECTIVES and WORKPLAN a. Progress towards project objectives Progress towards the overall objective of creating “a learner-centred ecosystem of digital services have been satisfactory. Elements of this ecosystem can be seen in the presented framework architecture and the specific implementation of the beta pilot versions. The next period should refine the beta versions, document clearly user feedback and how it informed developments and detail how real-life integrations could occur. The first objective (to study and develop an integrated and holistic learner-centred ecosystem) is on a good way to be fully achieved. Updated deliverable D15 is well documented and presents the study related to the development of CompLeap requirements and architecture design, detailing user needs related to the current service ecosystem. Significant progress towards the second objective (to tailor the functionality of this framework so that it is suitable across Europe) has been made mainly through efforts to deploy the beta prototypes to other countries than Finland, the availability of the developed solutions as open source, efforts to map existing competences to the ESCO ontology, together with developing a case study to exploit potential synergies between CompLEAP and EUROPASS. Progress towards the third objective (to technologically build prototypes of the CompLeap ecosystem) has been satisfactory. Compared to the HTML mock-up prototypes of the first reporting period, a beta version has been released that exemplifies the use of the ecosystem. There is however more to be done in relation to piloting and refinements. It is also crucial that at least the consortium assesses how mock- up implementations can be replaced by real-life data and how much effort this entails. It is desirable though that an integration with a real-life data API is implemented during the lifetime of the project. The fourth objective (to support the deployment of the ecosystem through various professional networks) has been properly addressed in the period under review. A strong commitment and collaboration among associated partners and networks has emerged in the period under review (M12-M18) and the deployment of the framework architecture and the developed prototypes including analytics will take place in Finland, the Netherlands, Germany and some other EU-countries (through networks that are already available among the partners, i.e. innoVET via Gradia). b. Progress in individual work packages The project was able to p...
OBJECTIVES and WORKPLAN a. Progress towards project objectives: Have the objectives for the period been achieved? In particular, has the project as a whole been making satisfactory progress in relation to the Description of Work (Annex I to the grant agreement)?:
OBJECTIVES and WORKPLAN a. Progress towards project objectives The overall objective of creating “a learner-centred ecosystem of digital services and products” seems at the current state partially achieved by means of an articulated framework architecture based on international standards. The first objective (to study and develop an integrated and holistic learner-centred digitalised ecosystem) has not yet been achieved. There is work being undertaken with regards studying and learner-centered systems, however from the provided documentation and deliverables (D15) the level of achievement is not sufficient. It is also apparent that there has been work towards defining user requirements and the ecosystem architecture, that is though not well documented and presented. The second objective (to tailor the functionality of this framework so that it is suitable across Europe) is aimed to be achieved though associate partners and networks; there is however little evidence of what associate partners have contributed to the project yet. The work undertaken for achieving the third objective (to technologically build prototypes of this ecosystem) is in the mid of this reporting period; however, with regards to the development of prototypes of the ecosystem the project has still a long way to go from the current design/mock-up state that has been presented. The fourth objective is not relevant for this reporting period. b. Progress in individual work packages Overall, the project has shown sufficient interaction between the work packages but integration of the work has been demonstrated only to an extent; it has not considered some of the commitments stated in the Grant Agreement-Description of the Action (GA-DoA). More specifically, there are 2 major deviations from the GA - DoA: (1) delays in the development of a working prototype and (2) limited use of allocated resources expected in Year 1 (see Recommendations above).

Related to OBJECTIVES and WORKPLAN

  • Objectives and Scope 1. The Parties confirm their joint objective of strengthening and deepening their relations in all fields covered by this Agreement by developing their political dialogue and reinforcing their co-operation. 2. The Parties confirm their joint objective of working towards creating conditions under which, building on the outcome of the Doha Work Programme, a feasible and mutually beneficial Association Agreement, including a Free Trade Agreement, could be negotiated between them. 3. Implementation of this Agreement should help to create these conditions by striving for political and social stability, deepening the regional integration process and reducing poverty within a sustainable development framework in the Andean Community. 4. This Agreement governs the political dialogue and co-operation between the Parties and contains the necessary institutional arrangements for its application. 5. The Parties undertake to periodically assess progress, taking account of progress achieved before the entry into force of the Agreement.

  • Objectives The Parties conclude this Agreement, among others, for purposes of: (a) Encouraging expansion and diversification of trade between the Parties; (b) Eliminating the barriers to trade in, and facilitate the cross-border movement of goods and services between the Parties; (c) Promoting fair competition in the Parties' markets; (d) Creating new employment opportunities; (e) Creating framework for furthering bilateral, regional and multilateral cooperation to expand and enhance the benefits of this Agreement; and (f) Providing forum and approach for resolution of disputes amiably.

  • Objectives of Agreement To enable the Company to perform work in the activities covered by this Agreement in a productive and efficient manner. • To enable employees to work in a productive, efficient, flexible and safe manner in accordance with their full skill and competence to meet the requirements of the Company and their clients. • To provide appropriate remuneration and conditions of employment for employees working under the terms of the Agreement.

  • Program Objectives Implement a rigorous constructability program following The University of Texas System, Office of Capital Projects Constructability Manual. Identify and document Project cost and schedule savings (targeted costs are 5% of construction costs). Clarification of Project goals, objectives.

  • Objective The objective of DST’s Security Policy and related information security program is to implement data security measures reasonably designed in material respects to be consistent with applicable prevailing industry practices and standards (“Objective”). In order to meet such Objective, DST uses commercially reasonable efforts to: a. Protect the privacy, confidentiality, integrity, and availability of all confidential data and information disclosed by or on behalf of Fund to, or otherwise comes into the possession of DST, in connection with the provision of services under the Agreement and to the extent the same is deemed confidential information under the terms of the Agreement (collectively, “Fund Data”). For the avoidance of doubt, and without limiting the foregoing, “Fund Data” includes all Confidential Information of the Fund and its agents or service providers, including, without limitation all “Customer Information,” as contemplated in the Agreement; b. Protect against accidental, unauthorized, unauthenticated or unlawful access, copying, use, processing, disclosure, alteration, transfer, loss or destruction of the Fund Data; c. Comply with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations that are relevant to the handling, processing and use of Fund Data by DST in accordance with the Agreement; and d. Implement customary administrative, physical, technical, procedural and organizational safeguards. e. Implement means and technology to encrypt Fund Data, mutually acceptable between the Fund and DST, while in transit to and from DST.