Options Compared Clause Samples

Options Compared. Two separate sets of adjusted44 NSYTs were developed and compared for evaluation. The ‘Base’ set of NSYTs corresponded to the NSYTs that utilized all available PSP data, plus PSP- based plot ages where available. The ‘Combined Sensitivity’ set of NSYTs included the replacement of PSP-based plot ages with AVI stand ages for all GYPSY forecasts, plus the removal of all GYPSY projections that exceeded a gross merchantable volume threshold of 600 m3/ha. The base and combined sensitivity NSYT options were then compared by yield group for the conifer, deciduous, and total species groups (Figure 16 to Figure 20). 44 Both sets of NSYTs included the combined adjustments for model bias removal, LT reduction, and inclusion of mortality functions.

Related to Options Compared

  • Incentive Plans During the Term of this Agreement, Executive shall be entitled to participate in all bonus, incentive compensation and performance based compensation plans, and other similar policies, practices, programs and arrangements of the Company, now in effect or as hereafter amended or established, on a basis that is commensurate with his position and no less favorable than those generally applicable or made available to other executives of the Company. The Executive's participation shall be in accordance with the terms and provisions of such plans and programs. Participation shall include, but not be limited to:

  • Options, Etc No person has the right (whether exerciseable now or in the future and whether contingent or not) to call for the issue of any share or loan capital of the Company under any option or other agreement (including conversion rights and rights of pre-emption) and no claim has been made by any person to be entitled to any such right.

  • Share Options With respect to the share options (the “Share Options”) granted pursuant to the share-based compensation plans of the Company and its subsidiaries (the “Company Share Plans”), (i) each Share Option intended to qualify as an “incentive stock option” under Section 422 of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), so qualifies, (ii) each grant of a Share Option was duly authorized no later than the date on which the grant of such Share Option was by its terms to be effective (the “Grant Date”) by all necessary corporate action, including, as applicable, approval by the board of directors of the Company (or a duly constituted and authorized committee thereof) and any required shareholder approval by the necessary number of votes or written consents, and the award agreement governing such grant (if any) was duly executed and delivered by each party thereto, (iii) each such grant was made in accordance with the terms of the Company Share Plans, the Exchange Act, and all other applicable laws and regulatory rules or requirements, including the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “Exchange”), and (iv) each such grant was properly accounted for in accordance with IFRS in the financial statements (including the related notes) of the Company. The Company has not knowingly granted, and there is no and has been no policy or practice of the Company of granting, Share Options prior to, or otherwise coordinating the grant of Share Options with, the release or other public announcement of material information regarding the Company or its subsidiaries or their results of operations or prospects.

  • Subawards The Recipient shall include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (k) in all subawards, regardless of dollar value, that are subject to the Service Contract Labor Standards statute or the Wage Rate Requirements (Construction) statute, and are to be performed in whole or in part in the United States.

  • Awards 1. The disputing parties may agree on a resolution of the dispute at any time before the tribunal issues its final award. 2. Where a tribunal makes a final award against either of the disputing parties, the tribunal may award, separately or in combination, only: (a) monetary damages and any applicable interest; and (b) restitution of property, in which case the award shall provide that the disputing Member State may pay monetary damages and any applicable interest in lieu of restitution. 3. A tribunal may also award costs and attorneys fees in accordance with this Agreement and the applicable arbitration rules. 4. A tribunal may not award punitive damages. 5. An award made by a tribunal shall have no binding force except between the disputing parties and in respect of the particular case. 6. Subject to paragraph 7 and the applicable review procedure for an interim award, the disputing party shall abide by and comply with an award without delay. (15) 7. The disputing party may not seek enforcement of a final award until: (a) in the case of a final award under the ICSID Convention: (i) 120 days has elapsed from the date the award was rendered and no disputing party has requested revision or annulment of the award; or (ii) revision or annulment proceedings have been completed; (b) in the case of a final award under the ICSID Additional Facility Rules, the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules, or the rules selected pursuant to Article 33(1)(e): (i) 90 days have elapsed from the date the award was rendered and no disputing party has commenced a proceeding to revise, set aside, or annul the award; or (ii) a court has dismissed or allowed an application to revise, set aside, or annul the award and there is no further appeal. 8. A claim that is submitted for arbitration under this Section shall be considered to arise out of a commercial relationship or transaction for purposes of Article 1 of the New York Convention. 9. Each Member State shall provide for the enforcement of an award in its territory.