Outcome of the workshop Sample Clauses
The 'Outcome of the workshop' clause defines what deliverables, results, or outputs are expected from a workshop session. It typically outlines the specific goals to be achieved, such as a summary report, action plan, or set of recommendations, and may specify the format or timeline for delivery. This clause ensures that both parties have a clear understanding of what constitutes successful completion of the workshop, thereby setting expectations and reducing the risk of misunderstandings regarding the workshop's value or results.
Outcome of the workshop. The main outcomes of the workshop are the following: Phase Outcomes
Outcome of the workshop. The main results of the workshop are the following: - The audience got a basic knowledge of open educational and open science resources and their peculiarities in several cultural contexts (Greece, Finland). - The participants got a basic knowledge of how OSRs have been developed and used in formal and informal learning processes at HEUREKA and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Foundation. - The participants got a basic knowledge of social tagging and its applicability in the context of OSRs. - The participants shared their experiences with development and usage of open educational resources (e.g. in Cambodia, Luxembourg, Belgium, Sweden). Based on participant discussion and feedback, the following issues and potential areas for improvement were identified:
Outcome of the workshop. Strengths: Weaknesses: Opportunities: Threats:
Outcome of the workshop. Strengths:
Outcome of the workshop. In the following section, we will present a short summary of the results. As we have used a qualitative methodology, we will mention the main aspects with an interpreted ranking. As we are not using a quantitative method, we cannot provide descriptive statistics but just interpret the statements of the stakeholders. However, we have seen clear tendencies in each of the discussed areas. Secondly, we briefly discuss the relation of OSR with the final recommendations of the WSF. The general level of Open Educational Resources/Open Content/Open Courseware (terms asked) was very low. Most people were aware after a short explanation (e.g. MIT launching their courses for free 10 years ago) but had not considered this as an alternative. It can be stated that the level of awareness was medium but only on a very generic level. The level of awareness on a science-specific level was very low. Only representatives of ministries of education were specifically informed about the opportunities and certain initiatives (such as European Schoolnet with the Learning Resource Exchange, LRE). Several African representatives mentioned the initiative of the African Virtual University but were not aware of further science-specific repositories. Furthermore, the UNESCO initiative on OER was rather known without specific knowledge whether countries/organisations have participated in or use the offers. As a summary, the awareness in educational ministries is of a basic level. The main reason is that there are specific persons taking care of OER projects/initiatives. However, in contrast to Open Source or Open Access, OER cannot yet be seen as mainstream so that a variety of stakeholders would be well aware.