Common use of Partial Settlement Clause in Contracts

Partial Settlement. Nothing in this Agreement should be construed as precluding any Signatory’s authority to settle, at its sole discretion, any claims asserted against it. a. A Settling Signatory will have no Judgment-Sharing Payment Obligations under this Agreement with respect to the claims settled by such Settling Signatory if, and only if, the settlement agreement with the Claimant includes the following provisions (a “Setoff Provision”) with respect to those claims: (i) a provision pursuant to which each settling Claimant agrees not to collect as a result of a judgment from any other Signatory, any other defendant in the Interchange Litigation, or any affiliates of the foregoing, an amount equal to the greater of the following (x) and (y) (with the amounts set forth in (x) to be allocated as set forth therein): (x) to the extent a Claimant settles, compromises or releases (a) any MasterCard-Related Claims against the Settling Signatory, the judgment-sharing payment obligations of the Settling Signatory with respect to MasterCard-Related Claims under all Sharing Agreements to which the Settling Signatory is a party (however those claims are described therein), and (b) any Inter-Network Claims against the Settling Signatory, the judgment-sharing payment obligations of the Settling Signatory with respect to Inter-Network Claims under all Sharing Agreements to which the Settling Signatory is a party (however those claims are described therein), or (y) the amount paid by the Settling Signatory to the Claimant; and (ii) a provision stating that the other Signatories to this Agreement, and other signatories to the Omnibus Agreement, and any affiliates of the foregoing, are intended third party beneficiaries of the Setoff Provision. For the avoidance of doubt, the Setoff Provision shall provide that the agreement of the settling Claimant(s) not to collect the greater of the Settling Signatory’s judgment-sharing payment obligation or the amount paid by the Settling Signatory to the Claimant from any other Signatory or other party in the Interchange Litigation shall apply to the full amount of any Monetary Award (including any trebling) against one or more non-Settling Signatories even if the Settling Signatory is not identified as a responsible party in the Final Judgment. b. In the event that a competent court or arbitrator finally determines that one of the foregoing provisions in this Paragraph is ineffective or unenforceable in whole or in part, or if the Settling Signatory does not include in its settlement agreement the provisions required by this Paragraph, the Settling Signatory will be obligated to satisfy its Judgment-Sharing Payment Obligations as required pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Agreement. c. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, payments to a Claimant by a Settling Signatory shall be deemed payments by such Settling Signatory pursuant to this Agreement to the extent and in the amount that such payments reduce the amount of a Final Judgment with respect to any MasterCard-Related Claims or Inter-Network Claims that may be enforced against other Signatories. d. For the purposes of this Agreement, “Sharing Agreements” refers collectively to (i) this Agreement, (ii) the Omnibus Agreement, (iii) the Interchange Judgment Sharing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2007, among Visa USA, Visa International, Visa Inc. and various financial institutions, as amended and restated in the Amended and Restated Judgment Sharing Agreement dated as of December 16, 2008, and as amended and to which the parties consented to amendment on February 7, 2011 in the “Consent to Amendment of Interchange Judgment Sharing Agreement” (the “Visa JSA”); and (iv) the Loss Sharing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2007, among Visa Inc., Visa International, Visa USA, and various financial institutions, as amended and restated in the Amended and Restated Loss Sharing Agreement dated as of December 16, 2008, and as amended and to which the parties consented to amendment on February 7, 2011 in the “Consent to Amendment of Loss Sharing Agreement” (the “Visa LSA”). The Visa JSA and Visa LSA are referred to collectively herein as the “Visa Agreements.”

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Settlement Agreement (Mastercard Inc)

Partial Settlement. Nothing in this Agreement should be construed as precluding any Signatory’s authority to settle, at its sole discretion, any claims asserted against it. a. A Settling Signatory will have no Judgment-Sharing Payment Obligations under this Agreement with respect to the claims settled by such Settling Signatory if, and only if, the settlement agreement with the Claimant includes the following provisions (a “Setoff Provision”) with respect to those claims: (i) a provision pursuant to which each settling Claimant agrees not to collect as a result of a judgment from any other Signatory, any other defendant in the Interchange Litigation, or any affiliates of the foregoing, an amount equal to the greater of the following (x) and (y) (with the amounts set forth in (x) to be allocated as set forth therein): (x) to the extent a Claimant settles, compromises or releases (a) any MasterCard-Related Claims against EXECUTION COPY CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT REQUESTED BY MASTERCARD INCORPORATED the Settling Signatory, the judgment-sharing payment obligations of the Settling Signatory with respect to MasterCard-Related Claims under all Sharing Agreements to which the Settling Signatory is a party (however those claims are described therein), and (b) any Inter-Network Claims against the Settling Signatory, the judgment-sharing payment obligations of the Settling Signatory with respect to Inter-Network Claims under all Sharing Agreements to which the Settling Signatory is a party (however those claims are described therein), or (y) the amount paid by the Settling Signatory to the Claimant; and (ii) a provision stating that the other Signatories to this Agreement, and other signatories to the Omnibus Agreement, and any affiliates of the foregoing, are intended third party beneficiaries of the Setoff Provision. For the avoidance of doubt, the Setoff Provision shall provide that the agreement of the settling Claimant(s) not to collect the greater of the Settling Signatory’s judgment-sharing payment obligation or the amount paid by the Settling Signatory to the Claimant from any other Signatory or other party in the Interchange Litigation shall apply to the full amount of any Monetary Award (including any trebling) against one or more non-Settling Signatories even if the Settling Signatory is not identified as a responsible party in the Final Judgment. b. In the event that a competent court or arbitrator finally determines that one of the foregoing provisions in this Paragraph is ineffective or unenforceable in whole or in part, or if the Settling Signatory does not include in its settlement agreement the provisions required by this Paragraph, the Settling Signatory will be obligated to satisfy its Judgment-Sharing Payment Obligations as required pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Agreement. c. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, payments to a Claimant by a Settling Signatory shall be deemed payments by such Settling Signatory pursuant to this Agreement to the extent and in the amount that such payments reduce the amount of a Final Judgment with respect to any MasterCard-Related Claims or Inter-Network Claims that may be enforced against other Signatories. d. For the purposes of this Agreement, “Sharing Agreements” refers collectively to (i) this Agreement, (ii) the Omnibus Agreement, (iii) the Interchange Judgment Sharing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2007, among Visa USA, Visa International, Visa Inc. and various financial institutions, as amended and restated in the Amended and Restated Judgment Sharing Agreement dated as of December 16, 2008, and as amended and to which the parties consented to amendment on February 7, 2011 in the “Consent to Amendment of Interchange Judgment Sharing Agreement” (the “Visa JSA”); and (iv) the Loss Sharing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2007, among Visa Inc., Visa International, Visa USA, and various financial institutions, as amended and restated in the Amended and Restated Loss Sharing Agreement dated as of December 16, 2008, and as amended and to which the parties consented to amendment on February 7, 2011 in the “Consent to Amendment of Loss Sharing Agreement” (the “Visa LSA”). The Visa JSA and Visa LSA are referred to collectively herein as the “Visa Agreements.”

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Settlement Agreement

Partial Settlement. Nothing in this Agreement should be construed as precluding any Signatory’s 's authority to settle, at its sole discretion, any claims asserted against it. a. A Settling Signatory will have no Judgment-Sharing Payment Obligations under this Agreement with respect to the claims settled by such Settling Signatory if, and only if, the settlement agreement with the Claimant includes the following provisions (a “Setoff Provision”) with respect to those claims: (i) a provision pursuant to which each settling Claimant agrees not to collect as a result of a judgment from any other Signatory, any other defendant in the Interchange Litigation, or any affiliates of the foregoing, an amount equal to the greater of the following (x) and (y) (with the amounts set forth in (x) to be allocated as set forth therein): (x) to the extent a Claimant settles, compromises or releases (a) any MasterCard-Related Claims against the Settling Signatory, the judgment-sharing payment obligations of the Settling Signatory with respect to MasterCard-Related Claims under all Sharing Agreements to which the Settling Signatory is a party (however those claims are described therein), and (b) any Inter-Network Claims against the Settling Signatory, the judgment-sharing payment obligations of the Settling Signatory with respect to Inter-Network Claims under all Sharing Agreements to which the Settling Signatory is a party (however those claims are described therein), or (y) the amount paid by the Settling Signatory to the Claimant; and (ii) a provision stating that the other Signatories to this Agreement, and other signatories to the Omnibus Agreement, and any affiliates of the foregoing, are intended third party beneficiaries of the Setoff Provision. For the avoidance of doubt, the Setoff Provision shall provide that the agreement of the settling Claimant(s) not to collect the greater of the Settling Signatory’s 's judgment-sharing payment obligation or the amount paid by the Settling Signatory to the Claimant from any other Signatory or other party in the Interchange Litigation shall apply to the full amount of any Monetary Award (including any trebling) against one or more non-Settling Signatories even if the Settling Signatory is not identified as a responsible party in the Final Judgment. b. In the event that a competent court or arbitrator finally determines that one of the foregoing provisions in this Paragraph is ineffective or unenforceable in whole or in part, or if the Settling Signatory does not include in its settlement agreement the provisions required by this Paragraph, the Settling Signatory will be obligated to satisfy its Judgment-Sharing Payment Obligations as required pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Agreement. c. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, payments to a Claimant by a Settling Signatory shall be deemed payments by such Settling Signatory pursuant to this Agreement to the extent and in the amount that such payments reduce the amount of a Final Judgment with respect to any MasterCard-Related Claims or Inter-Network Claims that may be enforced against other Signatories. d. For the purposes of this Agreement, “Sharing Agreements” refers collectively to (i) this Agreement, (ii) the Omnibus Agreement, (iii) the Interchange Judgment Sharing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2007, among Visa USA, Visa International, Visa Inc. and various financial institutions, as amended and restated in the Amended and Restated Judgment Sharing Agreement dated as of December 16, 2008, and as amended and to which the parties consented to amendment on February 7, 2011 in the “Consent to Amendment of Interchange Judgment Sharing Agreement” (the “Visa JSA”); and (iv) the Loss Sharing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2007, among Visa Inc., Visa International, Visa USA, and various financial institutions, as amended and restated in the Amended and Restated Loss Sharing Agreement dated as of December 16, 2008, and as amended and to which the parties consented to amendment on February 7, 2011 in the “Consent to Amendment of Loss Sharing Agreement” (the “Visa LSA”). The Visa JSA and Visa LSA are referred to collectively herein as the “Visa Agreements.”

Appears in 1 contract

Sources: Mastercard Settlement and Judgment Sharing Agreement (Mastercard Inc)