Participant Inclusion Criteria Clause Samples

Participant Inclusion Criteria. ‌ Participants who meet all of the following criteria and consent to randomization to one of three vaccine scheme groups will be eligible to participate in this interventional study: i. Healthy children aged 6-11 years and healthy adults aged 18-64 years that have not received the current season’s influenza vaccine or a mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in the past 6 months and have previously received at least a single dose of any US approved or authorized COVID-19 vaccine ii. English or Spanish literate iii. Email or text message capability for weekly follow-up iv. Intention of receiving influenza vaccine and mRNA COVID-19 vaccine based on ACIP- CDC guidelines v. Willing to provide written/electronic informed consent vi. Intention of being available for entire study period and able to complete all relevant study procedures, including follow-up phone calls and clinic visits
View Source
Participant Inclusion Criteria. Participants must meet all of the following criteria to qualify for participation in this study: 1. Participant has signed an ICF prior to any study-specific procedures being performed. 2. Participant is an ambulatory female between 18 and 45 years of age, inclusive. 3. Participant is in good physical health and has no clinically significant findings, as determined by the investigator, on physical examination, . 4. Participant agrees to adhere to the study requirements, including not participating in night shift work. 5. Participant has ceased lactating or agrees not to provide breastmilk to her infant(s) from just prior to receiving IP on Day 1 until 7 days after the last dose of IP. 6. Participant must have a negative pregnancy test at screening and Day 1 prior to the start of IP administration. 7. Participant has had a major depressive episode that began no earlier than the third trimester and no later than the first 4 weeks following delivery, and meets criteria for major depressive episode per DSM-5, diagnosed by SCID-5-CT. 8. Participant has a HAM-D total score of ≥26 at screening and Day 1 (prior to randomization). 9. Participant is ≤12 months postpartum at screening and Day 1. 10. Participants taking antidepressants must have been taking these medications at the same dose for at least 30 days prior to Day 1. Participants who have stopped taking antidepressants within 30 days must have stopped for longer than 5 half-lives of the antidepressant prior to Day 1, and will be stratified into the “no antidepressant group”. Participants receiving psychotherapy must have been receiving therapy on a regular schedule for at least 30 days prior to Day 1. 11. Participant is willing to delay the start of other antidepressant or antianxiety medications and any new pharmacotherapy regimens, including as-needed benzodiazepine anxiolytics and sleep aids, until after completion of the Day 45 visit. 12. Participant agrees to use at least one method of highly effective contraception as listed in Section 9.2.4 during participation in the study and for 30 days following the last dose of IP, unless she is surgically sterile (bilateral oophorectomy, hysterectomy, and/or bilateral salpingectomy), or does not engage in sexual relations which carry a risk of pregnancy (does not include abstinence). 13. Participant agrees to refrain from drugs of abuse and alcohol for the duration of the study.
View Source

Related to Participant Inclusion Criteria

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Award criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.

  • Criteria (1) Annual Evaluation Criteria. All performance evaluations shall be based upon assigned duties, and shall carefully consider the nature of the assignment in terms, where applicable, of: a. Teaching effectiveness, including effectiveness in presenting knowledge, information, and ideas by means or methods such as lecture, discussion, assignment and recitation, demonstration, laboratory exercise, practical experience, supervision of interns, theses, professional projects and/or dissertations, and direct consultation with students. The evaluation shall include consideration of effectiveness in imparting knowledge and skills, and effectiveness in stimulating students' critical thinking and/or creative abilities, the development or revision of curriculum and course structure, and adherence to accepted standards of professional behavior in meeting responsibilities to students. The evaluator may take into account class notes, syllabi, student exams and assignments, and any other materials relevant to the employee's teaching assignment. The teaching evaluation must take into account any relevant materials submitted by the employee, including the results of peer evaluations of teaching, and may not be based solely on student evaluations when this additional information has been made available to the evaluator. b. Contribution to the discovery of new knowledge, development of new educational techniques, and other forms of creative activity. Evidence of research and other creative activity shall include, but not be limited to, published books; articles and papers in professional journals; musical compositions, paintings, sculpture; works of performing art; papers presented at meetings of professional societies; funded grant activities; and research and creative accomplishments that have not yet resulted in publication, display, or performance. The evaluation shall include consideration of the employee's productivity, including the quality and quantity of the employee's research and other creative programs and contributions during the year, as well as recognition by the academic or professional community of what has been done. c. Public service that extends professional or discipline-related contributions to the community, the State, public schools, and/or the national and international community. This public service includes contributions to scholarly and professional organizations, governmental boards, agencies, and commissions that are beneficial to such groups and individuals. d. Participation in the governance processes of the University through significant service on committees, councils, and senates, beyond that associated with the expected responsibility to participate in the governance of the University through participation in regular departmental or college meetings. e. Other assigned University duties, such as attending University events, advising, counseling, and academic administration, or as described in a Position Description, if any, of the position held by the employee. Other assigned duties may include entrepreneurial activities that contribute to the further development of the University with an end result of creating a new venture. Evidence of entrepreneurial contributions shall include, but not be limited to, creation of self- supporting centers or institutes, development of multi- disciplinary research partnerships, and applications of research to implementations in society. To provide guidelines for the establishment, maintenance and use of employee evaluation files within the employee’s respective academic unit.