Peer Review Committees Sample Clauses

The 'Peer Review Committees' clause establishes the formation and operation of committees composed of professionals who evaluate the performance, conduct, or qualifications of their peers within an organization, typically in healthcare or academic settings. These committees may review cases of alleged misconduct, assess professional competence, or make recommendations regarding credentialing and disciplinary actions. By providing a structured process for peer evaluation, the clause helps ensure accountability, maintain professional standards, and protect the integrity of the organization.
Peer Review Committees. The CMHCC shall require that each University Provider’s Medical Director appoint an appropriately credentialed TDCJ Health Services representative designated by the TDCJ Director for Health Services as an ad hoc member to the University Provider’s peer review committees which relate directly to health and medical services provided to TDCJ patients, with the exception that the University Provider’s Medical Director may appoint a mutually agreed to independent third party designee as an ad hoc member in the event that there is a reasonable possibility of a conflict of interest between the two parties. Disputes over whether a conflict of interest between the parties exists can be referred to the CMHCC, but the decision of the CMHCC is not binding on the University Provider. The TDCJ appointee or independent third party designee to the peer review committee shall abide by the University Provider’s various bylaws, rules, regulations and policies governing the institution. 1. University Providers shall provide the TDCJ representative or independent third party designee access to a written summary of peer review matters to include any corrective action taken for those peer review committee cases for which the TDCJ representative or independent third party physician designee is an ad hoc member so long as the University Provider has deemed that no conflict of interest exists. Subject to the University Provider’s due process requirements, TDCJ’s representative may request corrective action be taken against the provider in question, including the removal from contact with TDCJ patients during the course of the peer review. 2. Disputes between the parties regarding corrective action and removal from treating patients will be referred to the CMHCC in accordance with this paragraph H, however all medical confidentiality provisions relating to the peer review findings and other confidential medical information shall remain in effect. Decisions of the CMHCC shall be binding on the parties.
View SourceView Similar (8)
Peer Review Committees. Peer Review Committees (“PRC”) monitor and evaluate the progress of probationers in the tenure review process. A separate PRC shall be established for each full-time probationer which shall serve as a standing committee until such time as the probationer is either granted tenure or employment in a faculty appointment is terminated. The purpose of the PRC is to evaluate the probationer’s performance with formative and summative methods throughout the probationary period, to assess whether the probationer has successfully met the tenure standards, and to make a recommendation regarding tenure for the probationer.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Peer Review Committees. Peer Review Committees (“PRC”) monitor and evaluate the progress of probationers in the tenure review process.
View Source

Related to Peer Review Committees

  • Review Committee The Board representatives agree to have meetings during the school year with the West Branch- Rose City Education Association to discuss problems that may or may not be covered by the provisions of this Agreement; said meetings and problems pertaining to the West Branch-Rose City Area Schools must have a reasonable advance notice and tentative agenda.

  • Advisory Committees The Board may appoint Advisory Committees to review design review applications, or provide input on other issues of concern to the Board or the Commission. These Advisory Committees include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following: 1. Cameron Park Design Review Committee 2. El Dorado Hills Design Review Committee 3. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Pines Design Review Committee 4. The County’s Economic Development Advisory Committee (“EDAC”)

  • Technical Advisory Committee (TAC The goal of this subtask is to create an advisory committee for this Agreement. The TAC should be composed of diverse professionals. The composition will vary depending on interest, availability, and need. TAC members will serve at the CAM’s discretion. The purpose of the TAC is to: • Provide guidance in project direction. The guidance may include scope and methodologies, timing, and coordination with other projects. The guidance may be based on: o Technical area expertise; o Knowledge of market applications; or o Linkages between the agreement work and other past, present, or future projects (both public and private sectors) that TAC members are aware of in a particular area. • Review products and provide recommendations for needed product adjustments, refinements, or enhancements. • Evaluate the tangible benefits of the project to the state of California, and provide recommendations as needed to enhance the benefits. • Provide recommendations regarding information dissemination, market pathways, or commercialization strategies relevant to the project products. The TAC may be composed of qualified professionals spanning the following types of disciplines: • Researchers knowledgeable about the project subject matter; • Members of trades that will apply the results of the project (e.g., designers, engineers, architects, contractors, and trade representatives); • Public interest market transformation implementers; • Product developers relevant to the project; • U.S. Department of Energy research managers, or experts from other federal or state agencies relevant to the project; • Public interest environmental groups; • Utility representatives; • Air district staff; and • Members of relevant technical society committees. • Prepare a List of Potential TAC Members that includes the names, companies, physical and electronic addresses, and phone numbers of potential members. The list will be discussed at the Kick-off meeting, and a schedule for recruiting members and holding the first TAC meeting will be developed. • Recruit TAC members. Ensure that each individual understands member obligations and the TAC meeting schedule developed in subtask 1.11. • Prepare a List of TAC Members once all TAC members have committed to serving on the TAC. • Submit Documentation of TAC Member Commitment (such as Letters of Acceptance) from each TAC member. • List of Potential TAC Members • List of TAC Members • Documentation of TAC Member Commitment

  • Training Committee The parties to this Agreement may form a Training Committee. The Training Committee will be constituted by equal numbers of Employer nominees and ETU employee representatives and have a charter which clearly states its role and responsibilities. It shall monitor the clauses of this Agreement which relate to training and ensure all employees have equal access to training.

  • Evaluation Committee A. The Association and the Board agree to establish a standing joint Evaluation Committee comprised of members of the District Leadership Council for the purpose of evaluating the policy, procedure and process for the evaluation of certified teachers in the District.