Performance Ranking Clause Samples

The Performance Ranking clause establishes a system for evaluating and ordering parties, products, or services based on specific performance criteria. Typically, this clause outlines the metrics or benchmarks used to assess performance, such as sales figures, quality scores, or delivery times, and describes how rankings will be determined and communicated. Its core practical function is to incentivize high performance and provide transparency, ensuring that all parties understand how their efforts will be measured and compared.
Performance Ranking. The TSR for the Performance Period for Valero and each company in the Target Group shall be arranged by rank from best to worst according to the TSR achieved by each company. The total number of companies so ranked shall then be divided into four groups ("Quartiles"). For purposes of assigning companies to Quartiles (with the 1st Quartile being the best and the 4th Quartile being the worst), the total number of companies ranked (including Valero) shall be divided into four groups as nearly equal in number as possible. The number of companies in each group shall be the total number contained in the Target Group divided by four. If the total number of companies is not evenly divisible by four, so that there is a fraction contained in such quotient, the extra company(ies) represented by such fraction will be included in one or more Quartiles as follows:
View SourceView Similar (5)
Performance Ranking. The TUR for the Year 1 TUR Period for the Partnership and each company in the Target Group shall be arranged by rank from best to worst according to the TUR achieved by each company. The total number of companies so ranked shall then be divided into four groups (“Quartiles” and each a “Quartile”). For purposes of assigning companies to Quartiles (with the 1st Quartile being the best and the 4th Quartile being the worst), the total number of companies ranked (including the Partnership) shall be divided into four groups as nearly equal in number as possible. The ACTIVE 259034022 number of companies in each group shall be the total number contained in the Target Group divided by four. If the total number of companies is not evenly divisible by four, so that there is a fraction contained in such quotient, the extra company(ies) represented by such fraction will be included in one or more Quartiles as follows:
View SourceView Similar (5)
Performance Ranking. The Company will use its best efforts to operate the specialist business in such a manner that the Company will maintain, at all times prior to the Closing Date, an overall tier classification of not lower than Tier 3 in the quarterly Specialist Performance Evaluation Questionnaire results prepared by the NYSE.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Performance Ranking. The TUR for the Performance Period for NuStar Energy L.P. and each company in the Target Group shall be arranged by rank from best to worst according to the TUR achieved by each company. The total number of companies so ranked shall then be divided into four groups (“Quartiles”). For purposes of assigning companies to Quartiles (with the 1st Quartile being the best and the 4th Quartile being the worst), the total number of companies ranked (including NuStar Energy L.P.) shall be divided into four groups as nearly equal in number as possible. The number of companies in each group shall be the total number contained in the Target Group divided by four. If the total number of companies is not evenly divisible by four, so that there is a fraction contained in such quotient, the extra company(ies) represented by such fraction will be included in one or more Quartiles as follows:
View SourceView Similar (2)
Performance Ranking. The TSR for the Performance Period for Valero and each company in the Target Group shall be arranged by rank from best to worst according to the TSR achieved by each company. The total number of companies so ranked shall then be divided into four groups ("Quartiles"). For purposes of assigning companies to Quartiles (with the 1st Quartile being the best and the 4th Quartile being the worst), the total number of companies ranked (including Valero) shall be divided into four groups as nearly equal in number as possible. The number of companies in each group shall be the total number contained in the Target Group divided by four. If the total number of companies is not evenly divisible by four, so that there is a fraction contained in such quotient, the extra company(ies) represented by such fraction will be included in one or more Quartiles as follows: fraction is 1/4: extra company(ies) in 1st Quartile fraction is 1/2: extra company(ies) in 1st and 2nd Quartile fraction is 3/4: extra company(ies) in 1st, 2nd and 3rd Quartile Any performance shares not awarded as shares of Common Stock as a result of a ranking in the 3rd or 4th Quartile will carry forward for one more Performance Period; up to 100% of the Performance Shares carried forward may be awarded based on Valero's TSR during the next Performance Period, provided, that if any Performance Shares are carried forward due to a ranking in the 3rd Quartile, no such shares shall be awarded unless Valero's TSR in the subsequent period is in the 2nd or 1st Quartile. To the extent shares of Common Stock are not distributed due to a ranking in the 3rd or 4th Quartile and are further deferred, such deferred shares may be distributed in accordance with this paragraph as soon as administratively practicable following a determination that such shares are to be awarded in accordance with this Paragraph 4(C), and in such event, the distribution shall not occur later than two-and-one-half months following the end of the year in which the vesting date for such Common Stock occurred.
View Source

Related to Performance Ranking

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit G), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Performance Adjustment One-twelfth of the annual Performance Adjustment Rate will be applied to the average of the net assets of the Portfolio (computed in the manner set forth in the Fund's Declaration of Trust or other organizational document) determined as of the close of business on each business day throughout the month and the performance period.

  • Performance Pay In accordance with Section 8 of the General Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2020-2021, contingent upon the availability of funds and at the Agency Head’s discretion, each agency is authorized to grant merit pay increases based on the employee’s exemplary performance, as evidenced by a performance evaluation conducted pursuant to Rule 60L-35, Florida Administrative Code.