Common use of PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND Clause in Contracts

PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF THE NET SETTLEMENT FUND. The Settlement Amount and the interest it earns is the “Settlement Fund.” The Settlement Fund, after deduction of Court-approved attorneys’ fees and expenses, Notice and Administration Expenses, Taxes, and any other fees or expenses approved by the Court, is the “Net Settlement Fund.” The Net Settlement Fund will be distributed to members of the Class who timely submit valid Claim Forms that show a Recognized Claim according to the Plan of Allocation approved by the Court. The Court may approve the following proposed Plan of Allocation or modify it without additional notice to the Class. Any order modifying the Plan of Allocation will be posted on the case website at: ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ and at ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. The purpose of this Plan of Allocation of the Net Settlement Fund (“Plan of Allocation” or “Plan”) is to establish a reasonable and equitable method of distributing the Net Settlement Fund among Authorized Claimants who allegedly suffered economic losses as a result of the alleged violations of the federal securities laws. For purposes of determining the amount an Authorized Claimant may recover under this Plan, Class Counsel have conferred with their damages expert. This Plan is intended to be generally consistent with an assessment of, among other things, the damages that Class Counsel and Class Representatives believe were recoverable in the Action. Defendants, however, deny any wrongdoing or damages; and the Plan is not a formal damages analysis and the calculations made pursuant to the Plan are not intended to be estimates of, nor indicative of, the amounts that Class Members might have been able to recover after a trial. An individual Class Member’s recovery under the Plan of Allocation will depend on, for example: (i) the total number of claims submitted and the value of those claims; (ii) when the Class Member purchased or acquired LSI publicly traded common stock; and (iii) whether and when the Class Member sold his, her, or its shares of LSI common stock. Because the Net Settlement Fund is less than the total losses alleged to be suffered by Class Members, the formulas described below for calculating Recognized Losses are not intended to estimate the amount that will actually be paid to Authorized Claimants. Rather, these formulas provide the basis on which the Net Settlement Fund will be distributed among Authorized Claimants on a pro rata basis. An Authorized Claimant’s Recognized Claim shall be the amount used to calculate the Authorized Claimant’s pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund. The pro rata share shall be the Authorized Claimant’s Recognized Claim divided by the total of the Recognized Claims of all Authorized Claimants, multiplied by the total amount in the Net Settlement Fund. If the Net Settlement Fund exceeds the sum total amount of the Recognized Claims of all Authorized Claimants entitled to receive payment out of the Net Settlement Fund, the excess amount in the Net Settlement Fund shall be distributed pro rata to all Authorized Claimants entitled to receive payment. This Plan of Allocation generally measures the amount of loss that a Class Member can claim for purposes of making pro rata allocations of the Net Settlement Fund to Authorized Claimants. For losses to be compensable as damages under the federal securities laws, the disclosure of the allegedly misrepresented information must be the cause of the decline in the price of LSI common stock. In this case, Class Representatives alleged that Defendants issued false statements and omitted material facts during the period from February 1, 2012 through May 7, 2014, inclusive (the Class Period), which artificially inflated the price of LSI common stock. It is alleged that corrective information was released to the market on July 1, 2012 (when the market was closed), January 31, 2013 (prior to market open), June 6, 2013 (after market close), July 16, 2013 (prior to market open), October 7, 2013 (prior to market open), November 21, 2013 (prior to market open), and prior to market open on May 8, 2014, negatively impacting the market price of LSI common stock and removing the alleged artificial inflation from the LSI common stock prices on July 2, 2012, January 31, 2013, June 7, 2013, July 16, 2013, October 7, 2013, November 21, 2013, and May 8, 2014. Accordingly, in order to have a compensable loss in this Settlement, a claimant must have purchased or otherwise acquired LSI common stock during the Class Period and held it through at least one of the alleged corrective disclosure dates listed above. Defendants, their respective counsel, and all other Released Defendant Parties will have no responsibility or liability for the investment of the Settlement Fund, the distribution of the Net Settlement Fund, the Plan of Allocation, or the review or payment of any claim. Class Representatives, Class Counsel, and anyone acting on their behalf, likewise will have no liability for their reasonable efforts to execute, administer, and distribute the Settlement.

Appears in 2 contracts

Sources: Settlement Agreement, Settlement Agreement