Planning Commission Action Sample Clauses

The "Planning Commission Action" clause defines the authority and procedures by which a planning commission reviews, approves, or denies development proposals or land use applications. Typically, this clause outlines the steps the commission must follow, such as holding public hearings, considering relevant regulations, and issuing formal decisions. Its core function is to ensure that land use decisions are made transparently and in accordance with established planning policies, thereby providing a clear and consistent process for applicants and the public.
Planning Commission Action. (NOVEMBER 1, 2018)
View SourceView Similar (3)
Planning Commission Action. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing on November 12, 2009, and recommended approval of this Amendment on the same date.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Planning Commission Action. On [Insert Date], 2024, as required by Section 65867 of the Development Agreement Act and Section 2.1 of the Procedures Resolution, the Planning Director gave public notice of the Planning Commission’s intention to consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of this Agreement. On [Insert Date] 2024, as required by Section 65867 of the Development Agreement Act and Section 2.2 of the Procedures Resolution, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on this Agreement. On [Insert Date], 2024, the Planning Commission, after considering that the FEIR was previously certified for the Project, recommended the City Council find and determine, consistent with the standards set forth in Section 2.3 of the Procedures Resolution, that: (1) the FEIR complied with all requirements of CEQA; (2) the Agreement is within the scope of the FEIR, and was contemplated therein as part of the Project; (3) the Agreement is consistent with the City’s General Plan and with the DRSP and the ARSP, as amended by DisneylandForward; (4) the Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in and regulations prescribed in the DRSP and the ARSP (as of the Effective Date); (5) the Agreement is compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding area; (6) the Agreement will have an overall positive effect on the health, safety and welfare of the residents of and visitors to the City; (7) the Agreement constitutes a lawful, present exercise of the City’s police power and authority under the Development Agreement Act, the Enabling Ordinance and the Procedures Resolution; and (8) is entered into pursuant to and in compliance with its charter powers and the requirements of Section 65867 of the Development Agreement Act, the Enabling Ordinance and the Procedures Resolution. Based on these findings and determinations, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. [insert number] on [Insert Date], 2024, recommending to the City Council the approval of the Agreement.
View Source
Planning Commission Action. On , as required by California Government Code Section 65867, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing review, and made a recommendation to the City Council regarding, the following land use entitlements (collectively, the “Entitlements”): (1) Conditional Use Permit ▇▇. ▇▇-▇▇ & ▇▇-▇▇ (▇) ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇. ▇▇-▇▇ & 19-02; (3) Architectural Design Review No. 18-05 & 19-07; and (4) CEQA Compliance Documents On , 2020, as required by the Development Agreement Act and the Development Agreement Resolution, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider, and made a recommendation to the City Council regarding, this Agreement.
View Source
Planning Commission Action. The Planning Commission of the City of Wildomar, based on the above finding and the conditions and obligations contained in the revised Development Agreement No. 20- 0078, hereby adopts PC Resolution No. 2021-21 recommending City Council adoption of an Ordinance (Exhibit 1 to this Resolution) approving a revision to Development Agreement No. 20-0078 with the findings, conditions and obligations contained in the record. AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAINED: ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Planning Commission Chairman ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇ Planning Director/Minutes Secretary ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇ Assistant City Attorney
View Source

Related to Planning Commission Action

  • Commission Approval The Parties understand and agree that this Agreement will be filed with the Commission for approval by such Commission (or the FCC if the Commission fails to act) pursuant to Section 252 of the Act. Each Party specifically reserves its right to judicial review of this Agreement under Section 252(e)(6) of the Act, or any other available remedy at law or equity. If the Commission, the FCC or any court rejects any portion of this Agreement, the Parties agree to meet and negotiate in good faith to arrive at a mutually acceptable modification of the rejected portion and any provisions that would be materially affected by deletion of the rejected portion; provided that such rejected portion shall not affect the validity of the remainder of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge that nothing in this Agreement shall limit a Party's ability, independent of such Party's agreement to support and participate in the approval of this Agreement, to assert public policy issues relating to the Act, including challenging the validity of any portion of the Act or an FCC or Commission rule, order, Guideline or other determination made pursuant to the Act, or the application by CBT for suspension or modification of portions of the Act or rules pursuant to Section 251(f)(2) of the Act. In the event CBT obtains a suspension or modification of any portion of the Act or rules thereunder pursuant to Section 252(f)(2) of the Act, the Parties shall negotiate as necessary to incorporate the applicable terms and conditions of such suspension or modification and the Parties agree to negotiate as necessary in order to clarify the application of such suspension or modification to the terms of into this Agreement.

  • Ceding Commission The Reinsurer shall allow the Company a ceding commission of (or a proportionate share of such amount in the event of a Quota Share Reduction) per annum, to be taken as a deduction from the first monthly premium payment to the Reinsurer at the commencement of this Contract and at each annual anniversary thereof, to cover the Company's operational costs directly allocable to writing the business subject hereto.

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the Funder has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).