Common use of Preliminary Matters Clause in Contracts

Preliminary Matters. On December 20, 2001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, American Cellular Corporation, (“American”) ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Communications Corporation (“▇▇▇▇▇▇”) and Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“Ameritech”) filed a joint request for approval of a Negotiated Interconnection Agreement, dated February 16, 2001, between the parties, pursuant to 47 U.S.C Secs. 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. 151, et seq. (“the Act”). The Agreement was submitted with the request. A statement in support of the request was filed, along with verifications sworn to by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, on behalf of American and ▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, on behalf of Ameritech, stating that the facts contained in the request for approval were true and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on January 10, 2002. Staff filed the Verified Statement of ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, Ph. D., a Policy Analyst with the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which was admitted into evidence. ▇▇. ▇▇▇ recommended approval of the Agreement. At the hearing, Staff and Ameritech indicated that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding, and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

Preliminary Matters. On December 20August 15, 2001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, American Cellular Corporation, (“American”) ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Communications Corporation (“▇▇▇▇▇▇”) and Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AmeritechAmeritech Illinois”) and Chicago 20 MHZ, LLC, (“Chicago 20”) filed a joint request for approval of an Amendment to a Negotiated Interconnection Agreement, dated February 16May 26, 2001, between the parties, pursuant to 47 U.S.C Secs. under Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. 151, et seq. (“the Act”). The Amendment to the Agreement was submitted with the request. A statement in support of the request was filed, along with verifications sworn to by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, on behalf of American and ▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, on behalf of AmeritechAmeritech Illinois, and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, on behalf of Chicago 20, stating that the facts contained in the request for approval were true and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on January 10September 6, 20022001. Ameritech and Chicago 20 were represented by counsel. Staff filed the Verified Statement of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, Ph. D.▇▇▇▇, a Policy Analyst with the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which was admitted into evidence. ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ recommended approval of the Agreement. At the hearing, Staff Staff, Ameritech Illinois and Ameritech Chicago 20 indicated that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding, and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

Preliminary Matters. On December 20February 28, 2001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, American Cellular Corporation, (“American”) ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Communications Corporation (“▇▇▇▇▇▇”) and Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AmeritechAmeritech Illinois”) and Pae Tec Communications, Inc. (“Pae Tec”) filed a joint request petition for approval of a the First Amendment to the Negotiated Interconnection Agreement dated January 19, 2001 (the “Amendment Agreement”), dated February 16, 2001, between the parties, pursuant to 47 U.S.C Secs. under Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151, et seq. .) (“the Act”). The Amendment Agreement was submitted with the requestpetition. A statement in support of the request petition was filed, filed along with verifications sworn to by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, on behalf of American and ▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, on behalf of AmeritechAmeritech Illinois, and ▇.▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, on behalf of Pae Tec, stating that the facts contained in the request petition for approval were are true and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge Hearing Examiner of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, on January 10April 4, 20022001. The Staff filed the Verified Statement of A. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, Ph. D., a Policy Analyst with ▇▇▇▇ of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which was admitted into evidence. ▇▇. ▇▇▇ recommended approval of the Agreement. At the hearing, hearing on Staff and Ameritech indicated appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding, . ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ Verified Statement was admitted into evidence and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

Preliminary Matters. On December 20February 28, 20012002, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, American Cellular Corporation, (“American”) ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Communications Corporation (“▇▇▇▇▇▇”) and Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AmeritechAmeritech Illinois”) filed a joint its request for approval of a Negotiated Interconnection Agreementthe first amendment to an Agreement that became effective December 22, dated February 162000, 2001(“the Amendment”) between Ameritech Illinois and Access One, between the parties, pursuant to 47 U.S.C Secs. Inc. (“ACCESS”) under Section 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat 56 (1996) (to be codified at 47 U.S.C. 151, et seq. .) (“the Act”). The Agreement Amendment was submitted with the request. A statement Statement in support of the request was filed, filed along with verifications a verification sworn to by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, on behalf of American and ▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, on behalf of Ameritecha Director Negotiator for Ameritech Services Inc./Illinois Bell Telephone Company Industry Markets, stating that the facts contained in the request for approval were are true and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of by the Commission, this matter came on for hearing hearings by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, Illinois on January 10April 2, 2002. Staff filed the Verified Statement of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, Ph. D., a Policy Analyst with ▇▇▇▇▇▇ of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which was admitted into evidence. ▇▇. ▇▇▇ recommended approval of the Agreement. At the hearinghearing on April 2, Staff 2002, Staff, and Ameritech indicated Illinois appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding, and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”

Preliminary Matters. On December 20November 2, 2001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, American Cellular Corporation, (“American”) ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Communications Corporation (“▇▇▇▇▇▇”) and Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“AmeritechAmeritech Illinois”) filed a joint its request for approval of a Negotiated Interconnection Agreement, the first amendment to an Agreement dated February 16November 1, 2001, (“the Amendment”) between the parties, pursuant to 47 U.S.C Secs. 252(a)(1Ameritech Illinois (“Ameritech”) and 252(eXO Illinois, Inc. (“XO”) under Section 252(3) of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-104, 110 Stat 56 (1996) (to be codified at 47 U.S.C. 151, et seq. .) (“the Act”). The Agreement Amendment was submitted with the request. A statement Statement in support of the request was filed, filed along with verifications a verification sworn to by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, on behalf of American and ▇▇▇▇▇▇, and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, on behalf of AmeritechDirector-Negotiations for Ameritech Services, Inc./ Illinois Bell Telephone Company Industry Markets, stating that the facts contained in the request for approval were are true and correct. Pursuant to notice as required by law and the rules and regulations of by the Commission, this matter came on for hearing hearings by a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Chicago, Illinois, Illinois on January December 10, 20022001. Staff filed the Verified Statement of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇, Ph. D., a Policy Analyst with ▇▇▇▇ of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which was admitted into evidence. ▇▇. ▇▇▇ recommended approval of the Agreement. At the hearing, Staff Staff, XO., and Ameritech indicated Illinois appeared and agreed that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding, and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.”