Common use of PROCEDURAL HISTORY Clause in Contracts

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 5, 2004, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC”) and Cinergy Communications Company (“Cinergy”) (SBC and Cinergy are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of the first amendment to their interconnection agreement (“Agreement”) dated July 30, 2004, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The amendment was filed with the joint petition along with the statement of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, Director-Contract Management for Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P./Illinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/a SBC Illinois Negotiations and Interconnection. Pursuant to due notice, this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on September 9, 2004. Appearances were entered by counsel for SBC and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ recommends approval of the amendment. At the conclusion of the hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 5, 2004, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC”) and Cinergy Communications Company American Fiber Network, Inc. (“CinergyAFN”) (SBC and Cinergy AFN are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of the first third amendment to their interconnection agreement (“Agreement”) dated July 3028, 2004, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The amendment was filed with the joint petition along with the statement of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, Director-Contract Management for Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P./Illinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/a SBC Illinois Negotiations and Interconnection. Pursuant to due notice, this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on September 9, 2004. Appearances were entered by counsel for SBC and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ recommends approval of the amendment. At the conclusion of the hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 5March 18, 20042002, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC”"Ameritech Illinois" or "Ameritech") and Cinergy Communications Company Premiere Network Services, Inc. (“Cinergy”"Premiere") (SBC Ameritech and Cinergy Premiere are referred to collectively as “"Petitioners”") filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of the first amendment to their interconnection agreement a negotiated Interconnection Agreement, dated February 25, 2002, between them (“"Agreement”") dated July 30, 2004, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96Telecommunications Act”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The amendment Agreement was filed with the joint petition along with and supported by the verified statement of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Director-Contract Management Local Performance for Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P./Illinois Telephone Company/Illinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/a SBC Illinois Negotiations and InterconnectionInterconnections. Pursuant to due notice, this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on September 9April 15, 20042002. Appearances were entered by counsel for SBC on behalf of Ameritech and Commission Staff (“"Staff”"). The Verified Statement Staff submitted the verified statement of ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, a Policy Analyst in ▇ of the Commission’s 's Telecommunications Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statementher statement, ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ recommends recommended approval of the amendmentAgreement. At the conclusion of the hearing hearing, the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 5October 1, 20042001, pursuant to 83 Illinois Administrative Code Part 763, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBCAmeritech Illinois”) and Cinergy Communications Company Telseon Carrier Services, Inc. (“Cinergy”) (SBC and Cinergy are referred to collectively as “PetitionersTelseon”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s request for approval of the first amendment to their interconnection agreement negotiated Interconnection Agreement dated August 14, 2001 (the “Agreement”) dated July 30), 2004, pursuant to under Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (47 U.S.C. 151, et seq.) (“TA96the Act”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The amendment Agreement was submitted with the request. A statement in support of the request was filed with the joint petition along with the statement verifications sworn to by ▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇, Director of Negotiations for Ameritech and ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, Director-Contract Management General Counsel for Southwestern Bell Telephone▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, L.P./Illinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/a SBC Illinois Negotiations stating that the facts contained in the request for approval are true and Interconnectioncorrect. Pursuant to due noticenotice as required by law and the rules and regulations of the Commission, this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in SpringfieldChicago, Illinois Illinois, on September 9October 17, 20042001. Appearances were entered by counsel for SBC and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The filed the Verified Statement of A. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, a Policy Analyst in of the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, which was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1evidence. In the Verified Statement, ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ recommends recommended the approval of the amendmentAgreement. At the conclusion of the hearing hearing, Staff indicated that there were no unresolved issues in this proceeding, and the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received.”

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 5April 28, 20042003, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC”) and Cinergy Communications Company Quick-Tel Communications, Inc. (“CinergyQTC”) (SBC and Cinergy QTC are referred to collectively as “Petitioners”) filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of the first amendment to their interconnection agreement (“Agreement”) dated July 30April 11, 20042003, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The amendment was filed with the joint petition along with the statement of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇, Director-Contract Management for Southwestern Bell Telephone, L.P./Illinois Bell Telephone Company LP d/b/a SBC Southwestern Bell Telephone Company/Illinois Negotiations and InterconnectionBell Telephone Company Negotiations. Pursuant to due notice, this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on September 9May 20, 20042003. Appearances were entered by counsel for on behalf of SBC and Commission Staff (“Staff”). The Verified Statement of ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, a Policy Analyst in the Commission’s Telecommunications Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statement, ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ recommends approval of the amendment. At the conclusion of the hearing the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On August 5January 30, 20042002, Illinois Bell Telephone Company (“SBC”"Ameritech Illinois" or "Ameritech") and Cinergy Communications Company Bullseye Telecom, Inc. (“Cinergy”"Bullseye") (SBC Ameritech and Cinergy Bullseye are referred to collectively as “"Petitioners”") filed with the Illinois Commerce Commission (“Commission”) a verified joint petition seeking the Commission’s approval of the first amendment to their interconnection agreement a negotiated Interconnection Agreement, dated December 10, 2001, between them (“"Agreement”") dated July 30, 2004, pursuant to Sections 252(a)(1) and 252(e) of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (“TA96Telecommunications Act”), 47 U.S.C. 151 et seq. The amendment Agreement was filed with the joint petition along with and supported by the verified statement of ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, Director-Contract Management Negotiations for Southwestern Bell TelephoneAmeritech Services, L.P./Illinois Inc./Illinois Bell Telephone Company d/b/a SBC Illinois Negotiations and InterconnectionIndustrial Markets. Pursuant to due notice, this matter came on for hearing before a duly authorized Administrative Law Judge of the Commission at its offices in Springfield, Illinois on September 9February 19, 20042002. Appearances were entered by counsel for SBC on behalf of Ameritech and Commission Staff (“"Staff”"). The Verified Statement Staff submitted the verified statement of A. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, a Policy Analyst in ▇ of the Commission’s 's Telecommunications Division, was admitted into the record as Staff Exhibit 1. In the Verified Statementhis statement, ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ recommends recommended approval of the amendmentAgreement. At the conclusion of the hearing hearing, the record was marked “Heard and Taken.” No petitions to intervene were received.”